republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

paul248

join:2001-09-04

reply to patcat88

Re: Citizen identification

Your idea is interesting, but why would we use IP addresses to identify individual RPC objects? I think there's some utility in giving each process its own IP address, and 64 bits per subnet is more than enough to permit that.

But, once you've reached a process, you can multiplex at the application layer to call a specific function. Using IP addresses for that sort of high-level thing is just silly.

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

said by paul248:

But, once you've reached a process, you can multiplex at the application layer to call a specific function. Using IP addresses for that sort of high-level thing is just silly.
But using IP addresses for delivering objects creates a premier paradigm shift of empowering a harmonization of open global unity and synergy solutions.</sarcasm>

I was half joking about allocating IPv6 adressing bits, its supposed to make sense and be reasonable, but I hope my joking proposal never happens, but some people on IETF are high horsed enough to be dead serious about giving every electrical and non electrical item and virtual item an ip address/GUID/tracking number for a Revelations barcode on your forehead future.

Saturday, 02-Jun 15:43:10 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics