| document smells of telcos Section 40 part 2:
"In contrast, economic ITMPs would generally not be considered unjustly discriminatory, as they link rates for Internet service to end-user consumption. Economic ITMPs also provide greater transparency to users than technical ITMPs, as they are reflected in monthly bills. Furthermore, these practices match consumer usage with willingness to pay, thus putting users in control and allowing market forces to work."
Here comes a bell skype tax, here comes a bell you tube tax. Traffic from either of these apps or web pages will have a mandatory UBB applied to them at all times (every mb from these apps or sits will cost 30 cents).
Bell has the right to implement UBB on any app or website they want, without crtc approval. This who piece of crap document just went right out the window with that statement. |
bt
join:2009-02-26
canada
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·Start Communicat..
| Except those examples are ones that would be considered discriminatory - blatantly so.
Remember, there's a big difference between "would generally not be considered unjustly discriminatory" and "would never be considered unjustly discriminatory". |
