 jtudorXm 60's On 6 FreakPremium,MVM join:2002-12-07 Morganton, NC | reply to Joe12345678
Re: In the us only tmobile or att works with the sim based iphon said by Joe12345678:In the us only tmobile or att works with the sim based iphone True, but you can place a sure bet that if exclusivity is gone, there will quickly be a CDMA iPhone on the market for Verizon, and others. That is one of the safest bets around.
The only spoiler is the upcoming Droid for Verizon. -- Best of luck
"Do, or Do not, there is no try!" Yoda
|
|
 Reviews:
·Acanac
| said by jtudor:said by Joe12345678:In the us only tmobile or att works with the sim based iphone True, but you can place a sure bet that if exclusivity is gone, there will quickly be a CDMA iPhone on the market for Verizon, and others. That is one of the safest bets around. The only spoiler is the upcoming Droid for Verizon. No there won't. There is a reason why Verizon is pushing Android so hard right now : they know there is no way in hell Apple will ever make a CDMA iPhone.
As far as an LTE iPhone goes, it won't happen next year. Most likely is 2011 when there will be more then just 1 carrier with an LTE network around. Apple wants to SELL the iPhone, not produce a small number for an insignificant market.
Adi |
|
 | reply to jtudor said by jtudor:said by Joe12345678:In the us only tmobile or att works with the sim based iphone True, but you can place a sure bet that if exclusivity is gone, there will quickly be a CDMA iPhone on the market for Verizon, and others. That is one of the safest bets around. The only spoiler is the upcoming Droid for Verizon. I'd tend to agree. It's hard to imagine that Apple has that much of a problem with CDMA if one subscribes to the notion that they approached Verizon first with the idea of the iPhone.
It's certainly not a stretch to think that Apple already has protypes of a CDMA or more likely a CDMA/GSM/WCDMA version of the iPhone made up already. After all, despite being committed to the PowerPC architecture at least in public, they had OS X running on x86 years before switching over to Intel.
However, these Droid ads that VZW is running complicates matters. If they had just went on air and promoted the benefits of the phone in an of itself that wouldn't be too big of a deal. However, since they chose to go offensive, who knows what may happen. Teh Steve can't be happy with the iDon't stuff and I'm sure that he has a long memory. |
|
 | reply to adisor19 said by adisor19:No there won't. There is a reason why Verizon is pushing Android so hard right now : they know there is no way in hell Apple will ever make a CDMA iPhone. As far as an LTE iPhone goes, it won't happen next year. Most likely is 2011 when there will be more then just 1 carrier with an LTE network around. Apple wants to SELL the iPhone, not produce a small number for an insignificant market. Adi Exactly, there is no reason for them to make a CDMA iPhone specifically for 1 carrier. CDMA is dead anyway, if anything the phone will come to T-Mobile in the US.
T-Mobile is really pushing there 3G, and they are going to have the fastest wireless network, faster then Verizon's LTE at launch. (21 Mbps vs. 6 - 8 Mbps).
Altho if T-Mobile wont give apple what it wants, then I think the phone would just stay on AT&T till someone comes around with a LTE network that has a high % of coverage. |
|
 | reply to adisor19 I disagree with that slightly, while they do not want to make a product for a small niche market, they probably do want to release an LTE based phone.
LTE is backwards compatable with GSM, UMTS, and CDMA2000.
What that means for Apple, is that they can sell an iphone that will work on any network in the US. In fact, It would work on any network on the planet (except for NTT Docomo in Japan, and probably a few others).
That makes good business sense for Apple, single device, works anywhere. My guess would be that you are right about the time frame, though it probably has more to do with tweaking the combination of the LTE hardware and battery life. Figure late 2010 early 2011 is my guess. |
|
 | reply to dlewis23 The major issue with Tmo 3g, it runs on an odd frequency band in the US. So apple would have to make a separate device just to work on Tmobile in the US.
Also, in the end, LTE has a much higher bandwidth rate (if memory serves me, up to about 300ish mbit down, 100ish mbit up), UMTS will never reach those speeds. |
|
 | said by jvanbrecht:The major issue with Tmo 3g, it runs on an odd frequency band in the US. So apple would have to make a separate device just to work on Tmobile in the US. Also, in the end, LTE has a much higher bandwidth rate (if memory serves me, up to about 300ish mbit down, 100ish mbit up), UMTS will never reach those speeds. Maybe, maybe not, a firmware change for T-mobile might be all thats needed. And I think they are having to some funky thing with the iPhone in china to get it to work on there 3G but i'm not 100% sure on that.
LTE does have a much higher bandwidth rate then HSPA, but the question is, how fast are carries going to let it get there.
Verizon said 6 - 8 Mbps at LTE launch, are they going to keep it that speed for 5 years? no one knows, Going by what T-Mobile said, there 3G will be faster then Verizons LTE, at least for a little bit. |
|
 | reply to dlewis23 There is a reason when that carrier is the biggest in the nation, and they have by far the best network. If other phone makers can easily make a CDMA version of their phones Im sure Apple is capable of doing it! |
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | reply to jvanbrecht Wind Mobile up in canada (nationwide 3g) will be AWS. If they want an iphone and TMO wants an iphone, apple may be more likely to make an AWS version of the iphone. |
|
 en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | reply to dlewis23 China Unicom has GSM 900 and UMTS/HSPA 2100, and had already ordered 5 million iPhones for sale.
»www.ibtimes.com/articles/2009081···mber.htm
I wouldn't expect any CDMA 1x/EVDO chipset in the near future, unless the CDG paid for it (not likely)
Stats: GSM / HSPA = 89%, CDMA 1x/EVDO = 9% »www.3gamericas.org/index.cfm?fus···geid=565
More importantly ... growth: »www.3gamericas.org/index.cfm?fus···geid=322
GSM base added more customers in the last year than CDMA has total. |
|
 en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | reply to jvanbrecht I agree... it won't be until an LTE platform is developed and sold by Apple. On a global scale, I think that it may be at least until 2011 before they have enough, or they'll have to sell existing and an LTE model as they do with iPhone 3G + iPhone 3GS. |
|
 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to dlewis23 said by dlewis23:said by jvanbrecht:The major issue with Tmo 3g, it runs on an odd frequency band in the US. So apple would have to make a separate device just to work on Tmobile in the US. Also, in the end, LTE has a much higher bandwidth rate (if memory serves me, up to about 300ish mbit down, 100ish mbit up), UMTS will never reach those speeds. Maybe, maybe not, a firmware change for T-mobile might be all thats needed. And I think they are having to some funky thing with the iPhone in china to get it to work on there 3G but i'm not 100% sure on that. LTE does have a much higher bandwidth rate then HSPA, but the question is, how fast are carries going to let it get there. Verizon said 6 - 8 Mbps at LTE launch, are they going to keep it that speed for 5 years? no one knows, Going by what T-Mobile said, there 3G will be faster then Verizons LTE, at least for a little bit. To work with T-Mobile's 3G, a new radio would have to be installed, but that wouldn't be that hard. -- My BLOG! Black Friday Ads |
|
 | reply to adisor19 no way apple will make an cdma iphone??? Then why is Bell canada showing this? »www.bell.ca/home/ |
|
 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| said by Str8_Krazy :no way apple will make an cdma iphone??? Then why is Bell canada showing this? » www.bell.ca/home/ Because Bel and Telus spent money to build a GSM network just for the iPhone.
»www.iphoneincanada.ca/iphone-new···ne-time/ -- My BLOG! Black Friday Ads |
|
|
|
 fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 2 edits | reply to dlewis23 Where do you guys come up with this notion that "there is no way in hell" that apple would make a CDMA phone?
Seriously... what is hard to understand? dead or not.., which it's not, CDMA has a VERY large customer base of users and they are in the millions.. millions x that many customers equates to large chunks of revenue.
It's been proven that customers don't always defect a carrier for a phone, and this site also proves that daily.
Further, there is not just 1 carrier that uses CDMA.. Sprint, Verizon, US Cellular.. shall I go on? Even with verizon shifting away, they will still have a few years in CDMA and customers that would be willing to stay for a CDMA phone at this time, which would outlast their upgrade and phase out plans as they migrate, eventually, to another technology. Verizon isn't going to turn on a dime just becuase of the iPhone; an already saturated market. (Many of those new iPhones are upgrades, by the way)
And, its not like it's some HUGE deal to develop a CDMA iPhone.. many phone makers have versions in various technologies.. anyone heard of the Blackberry? .. and it has a FAR larger share than the iPhone does in the market.
So really - ask yourselves, all, why you guys think that iPhone is some exception to the rule when it comes to having a phone that works on more than one single system.. if they invested just a small amount of money, I believe that apple knows they'd make their money back even with the CDMA market in this country.. so why don't you guys?
I know it's fun to sit here on BBR and act like an expert and that you all have the answers to everything, but the point is that regularly, many people here are proven wrong.. time and time again.
For the record, apple has been recruiting CDMA engineers.
... oh yea.. and I could care less if it's 7.5 or 21 mb, does anyone think the current iPhone can really take advantage of those speeds? ... hardly. I have 50 meg in my house and through WiFi it's still slow as a pig... Those nifty fast speeds they keep talking about are going to be more useful for mobile computers and POSSIBLY tether plans than they are the phone itself.. and, too, when they start pushing out more traditional VoIP based calling on their handsets..
oh yea again.. one more last thing.. don't forget that the iPhone was originally targeted to Verizon - a CDMA carrier.. so it's most likely they are pretty far ahead on the "planning" of a CDMA based iPhone. |
|
 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| 1. Yes, please continue listing your list of CDMA carriers. 2. Most are not upgrades, if you read the article earlier in the week, millions were new subscribers to AT&T's horrible network just for the iPhone. 3. Apple has recruited CDMA engineers for their upcoming projects (probably tablet/UMPC related). -- My BLOG! Black Friday Ads |
|
 | reply to adisor19 2011, 4G/LTE iPhone on VZW... -- Splat |
|
 | reply to fiberguy I never said there was no way in hell.. I said it was unlikely.
Sure, all that is really needed is a different radio and a driver change in the iphone for cdma to work..
Now Apple has to have 2 different devices made for them (by foxxcon I believe). The potential result may be an over production in CDMA phones which have limited use outside the US (yes there are millions of CMDA users, but thats the possibility is there). There is of course the cost of paying someone to maintain 2 different lines of products.
Why, why bother spending all that additional money, when they can wait a few months longer, produce a single device that will work on all current and most likely future wireless network topologies... and not have to deal with a third device (the LTE one assuming they actually do start making gsm and cdma variants) in a year or 2 when everyone is pushing LTE. (Verizon already has 2 small test areas).
No one really knows at the moment, everyone is speculating, except people inside apple.
But from a cost/production standpoint over the long term, does it really make sense to produce 3 different devices, when they could produce a single device that works on all networks, and will most definitely maximize their profits |
|
 | reply to dlewis23 A firmware change will do nothing, the radio unit inside the iphone is a hardware unit that only supports specific frequency ranges. For 3g to work on Tmobile, it would require a completely new radio. |
|
 TweakPremium join:2002-06-08 Oklahoma City, OK | reply to fiberguy I bet its not very hard to do at all . I bet apple even has a working prototype that could quickly be turned into a production model. |
|