http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23236308 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:39:51 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:39:51 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23272796 Somnambul33t : higher CPU, hands down. unless the difference is close to nil, higher CPU will be more beneficial in more situations.

higher mem clocks were better years ago when it was the bottleneck of the 2. now with triple channel and 333+mhz clockspeeds, raw clockspeed should always be desired.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23272796 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:33 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23239116 HRM : Why don't you just bench and tell us?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23239116 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:58:35 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23238326 tempnexus : so for core i7 systems the memory throughput created by higher mem multiplier won't make a difference?
It's better to have higher CPU cycles then higher memory cycles?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23238326 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:04:24 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23237956 HRM : FSB is king of the OC. All things equal, multiplier lower, FSB higher is faster.

Test with super Pi. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23237956 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:01:39 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23237627 Airwolf : Higher CPU.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23237627 Sun, 25 Oct 2009 01:43:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23236308 tempnexus : Ok I can go Core i7 2.6 ghz @ either
CPU 4.2 Ghz and Ram at DDR3-1263

OR

CPU at 4.0 GHZ and Ram at DDR-1600

Which would you choose?
If I want to game which would benefit me better?

How about everyday life like compressing files etc.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23236308 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:42:14 EDT