| reply to NY Tel
Re: Limitations? AT&T takes it off of your minutes. The only reason why I didn't do this before they officially started 'supporting' it.
A number port would still be better. |
|
 NY TelPremium
join:2004-04-09
Smithtown, NY
kudos:3
 ·AT&T CallVantage
1 edit | said by Necronomikro:AT&T takes it off of your minutes. The only reason why I didn't do this before they officially started 'supporting' it. A number port would still be better. Yes and I don't like losing my call waiting. I use that a lot.
EDIT: Now call waiting works when using the *71 code. |
|
1 edit | reply to Necronomikro
said by Necronomikro:AT&T takes it off of your minutes. The only reason why I didn't do this before they officially started 'supporting' it. A number port would still be better. Agree. If one uses a prepaid phone, they'll see minutes used up faster than if they just used their cellphone carriers voicemail (which is usually no charge if you don't answer or if your cellphone is off). |
|
NY TelPremium
join:2004-04-09
Smithtown, NY
kudos:3 Reviews:
·AT&T CallVantage
1 edit | said by burgerwars:said by Necronomikro:AT&T takes it off of your minutes. The only reason why I didn't do this before they officially started 'supporting' it. A number port would still be better. Agree. If one uses a prepaid phone, they'll see minutes used up faster than if they just used their cellphone carriers voicemail (which is usually no charge if you don't answer or if your cellphone is off). Until Google creates their own wireless carrier...........
 |
|
|
|
