<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>New to wireless security in Wireless Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23258536</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:17:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:17:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23268506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><b>Kojak1958</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jbibe <A HREF="/useremail/u/322587"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Kojak1958 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I gather from reading, the SSID characters are randomly injected into the network authentication key. Thus, logically a long SSID increases the difficulty of cracking the N.A.K.<br> </div>The SSID is appended to the end of the passphrase. The result is then hashed 4096 times to produce the desired 256-bit PSK (Pre-Shared Key). Since the SSID is known, or can be easily recovered, a long SSID does not add any strength. Select a unique SSID that you can easily remember. The strength of the PSK depends on the unknown passphrase. As a minimum, select passphrase with 30 random, printable, ASCII characters. Better yet, select a passphrase with 63 random ASCII characters, as suggested by SoonerAL.<br> </div>Thanks. My current passphrase is 63 random Alpha-numeric characters.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23268506</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:32:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23267987</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/322587"><b>jbibe</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Kojak1958 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I gather from reading, the SSID characters are randomly injected into the network authentication key. Thus, logically a long SSID increases the difficulty of cracking the N.A.K.<br> </div>The SSID is appended to the end of the passphrase. The result is then hashed 4096 times to produce the desired 256-bit PSK (Pre-Shared Key). Since the SSID is known, or can be easily recovered, a long SSID does not add any strength. Select a unique SSID that you can easily remember. The strength of the PSK depends on the unknown passphrase. As a minimum, select passphrase with 30 random, printable, ASCII characters. Better yet, select a passphrase with 63 random ASCII characters, as suggested by SoonerAL.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23267987</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:25:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23265405</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><b>Kojak1958</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SoonerAl <A HREF="/useremail/u/662411"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Here are some threads that talk a bit about a long SSID, hash values, etc.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,20647560">WPA</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,22106156">How to make sure my wireless point not to be hacked?</A><br><br>Personally I configured my wireless network with a short SSID, ie. 5 characters, a long 63-character random ASCII key and use WPA2-PSK [AES] and sleep well at night.<br> </div>I gather from reading, the SSID characters are randomly injected into the network authentication key. Thus, logically a long SSID increases the difficulty of cracking the N.A.K.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23265405</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:27:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23265245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><b>Kojak1958</b></A> : I reiterated my remaining question without refreshing the page. <br><br>Hence the noted editing. Thanks for your help.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23265245</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:57:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23264737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662411"><b>SoonerAl</b></A> : Here are some threads that talk a bit about a long SSID, hash values, etc.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,20647560">WPA</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,22106156">How to make sure my wireless point not to be hacked?</A><br><br>Personally I configured my wireless network with a short SSID, ie. 5 characters, a long 63-character random ASCII key and use WPA2-PSK [AES] and sleep well at night.<br><small>--<br>"When all else fails, read the instructions..."<br>MS-MVP Windows Desktop Experience</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23264737</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:55:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23260549</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><b>Kojak1958</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SoonerAl <A HREF="/useremail/u/662411"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>     :</small><br><br>I would not bother with disabling the SSID broadcast. You can cause connectivity issues with your clients and its simply not a valid security measure. Otherwise except for a long SSID, I use a simple and short unique SSID, that is how I protect my home wireless network.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/wlan">Wireless Networking Forum FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/wlan/40.0_Security#10907">What happens when I disable SSID Broadcast? Am I more secure?</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726942.aspx" >technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr&middot;&middot;&middot;942.aspx</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/LAN/SoHoWirelessSecurity.html" >theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/L&middot;&middot;&middot;ity.html</A><br> </div>Thanks for the information. My network is a home/private network. I've re-enabled SSID broadcast. I left the long string of characters for my SSID. As opposed to a short SSID, when hashed with the 63 character key, it's my understanding this will improve the security of my network. Yes ?<br><br>P.S.<br><br>I installed/ran inSSIDer. Marvelous tool ! Everyone within range (including myself were on Ch. 6 . I moved to a different channel.<br>When setting up my wireless connection, I selected WPA2-PSK.<br>inSSIDer says I'm using WPA2-CCMP. What's up with that ?<br><br>P.P.S.<br><br>Re: WPA2-CCMP, I got my answer here: <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/sb/cs-025806.htm" >www.intel.com/support/wireless/w&middot;&middot;&middot;5806.htm</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCMP" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCMP</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23260549</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:05:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23258821</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/662411"><b>SoonerAl</b></A> : I would not bother with disabling the SSID broadcast. You can cause connectivity issues with your clients and its simply not a valid security measure. Otherwise except for a long SSID, I use a simple and short unique SSID, that is how I protect my home wireless network.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/wlan">Wireless Networking Forum FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/wlan/40.0_Security#10907">What happens when I disable SSID Broadcast? Am I more secure?</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726942.aspx" >technet.microsoft.com/en-us/libr&middot;&middot;&middot;942.aspx</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/LAN/SoHoWirelessSecurity.html" >theillustratednetwork.mvps.org/L&middot;&middot;&middot;ity.html</A><br><small>--<br>"When all else fails, read the instructions..."<br>MS-MVP Windows Desktop Experience</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23258821</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:21:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>New to wireless security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23258536</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1685076"><b>Kojak1958</b></A> : Greetings,<br><br>I think I've got all the bases covered.<br><br>I'm currently employing WPA2-PSK network authentication<br>and AES data encryption.<br><br>My SSID Broadcast is disabled. My SSID consists<br>of a 29 character mix of numbers and letters<br>(no dictionary terms).<br><br>My network key consists of a 63 character mix<br>of letters and numbers (no dictionary terms).<br><br>What do you guys think ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23258536</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:39:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
