How is it that Google complains of the high costs of providing a free connectivity on a network that is based on a per minute pricing model.
This is an Anti Trust Violation (selling a service below your cost for an extended period of time to gain competitive advantage and gain control over the customer base).
Google must pay for connectivity because they are complaining about the cost of providing connectivity.
If you can understand that then you can understand that any cost is high if you are not charging enough to cover your costs.
If you can understand that then you can understand that Google's current reasoning applies to all of the calls they connect because they all have a cost but Google is not charging.
Thus by Google's reasoning if they want to they could block all calls.
You don't know anything about trust or the sherman anti-trust law. There is nothing illegal about obtaining a trust. It's illegal for a Trust to use their trust to force their way into another market. Google isn't a Trust any more than ATT is. Until they are a Trust your complaint is hogwash.
reply to Epoe How dare those sex and conference lines offer "free" service. They are selling their service below cost to gain a competitive advantage.
Google has every right to block any number they want to. Don't forget that you have to pay another company for phone service to use google voice. -- Democrats are not Socialists any more than Republicans are.
·
·
·