republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

reply to dynodb

Re: LOL at the simplemindedness

And I find it hilarious that so many assume doing nothing to increase the capacity of the network will address future bandwidth needs.

Be it backhaul, fiber, and such. There is no telcom out there that wont go to that vending machine to take an extra $200 million in profit instead of improving their networks as much as they should to keep the network growing.

Sure it takes time and money, but you have to invest both of those things for the future and you have to do it at a pace that keeps up with demand, if not surpasses it.

dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

said by Skippy25:

And I find it hilarious that so many assume doing nothing to increase the capacity of the network will address future bandwidth needs.
Check their 3rd quarter results- $4.2 billion in capital expenditures this quarter and over $11 billion year to date. It's fair to assume that a signficant amount of that went to wireless expansion and upgrades.

WhatNow
Premium
join:2009-05-06
Charlotte, NC

If this crowd of experts were in upper management would it be the most successful company in the world or bankrupt 12 months from now?


Friday, 01-Jun 19:51:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics