Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Wireless/Mobile Connectivity » Clearwire » Voice and gaming suck on Clear - Sprint 4G? HAHAHA
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1571
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[ Equipment] clear voip adapter locked? »
« [General] Read the fine print!!!  
AuthorAll Replies


w0g
o.O

join:2001-08-30
Portland, OR
clubs:
·Clearwire Wireless


1 edit
Voice and gaming suck on Clear - Sprint 4G? HAHAHA

I've been using Skype the past week and there's no way Clear could be thinking of using this network for voice. The latency is so bad, there's huge delays in conversation and drop outs. Like everyone else with WiMAX, the ping to the first hop is 50ms and higher, and the very best rating I get from pingtest.net is borderline B rating, VoIP can suffer and videogames. So I've been videogaming, playing Quake Live and the only servers I can compete on with Clear are the Seattle servers that I get 70ms pings to. SF, LA, Chicago, Dallas, all these other servers my 100ms+ ping makes me easy picking for the other players. I could go back to Comcast and get 20ms pings to these same servers, but I'm stuck in a location currently where I can't get a wired connection. One thing that stumps me is why the Clearwire customers, who use similar and less sophisticated technology than WiMAX, are able to get 2-3ms pings to the first hop and pings on average, 40ms lower than Clear. Information from wimax.com suggestions there's a huge latency performance problem with Clear WiMAX.

quote:
Quality of Service (QoS) is what determines if a wireless technology can successfully deliver high value services such as voice and video. The chief detractors from good QoS are latency, jitter and packet loss. Solve these issue and you have a carrier-grade service. Very simply put, WiMAX offers a very low latency across the wireless span. Most ven-dors have products where latency is less than 10 milliseconds from base station to CPE (and vice versa). To put this in perspective, latency must be measured end-to-end. VoIP, for example, is highly susceptible to latency. If latency exceeds 150 milliseconds for ex-ample, the quality of the conversation begins to drag. At or above 200 milliseconds many listeners may find a conversation unintelligible.

In the case of WiMAX, the large majority of latency will not occur on the air link be-tween subscriber and base station but rather on the wired portion of the connection be-tween the subscriber and what ever the "other end" might be (web site server, IPTV server or VoIP called party). The figure below illustrates how any latency on the wireless portion of a network is minimal relative to that on the wired portion of a network.
So what's the problem with Clear? :mad:

»www.wimax.com/education/wimax/qos

Signals are all good:

»/linequality/6···/2581467



--
www.aimless.us - irc.aimless.us channel #fix


w0g
o.O

join:2001-08-30
Portland, OR
clubs:
·Clearwire Wireless


1 edit
BTW!!!! This topic isn't about bad connections, I'm talking strictly about perfect and normally operating service. So please go to one of the other topics before mentioning your other connection issues here.

Thanks!
--
www.aimless.us - irc.aimless.us channel #fix


knighthawktf

@clearwire-wmx.net

You just noticed this,lol? Welcome to clear, I'll be surprised if you'll ever see anything below the mid 60's, my results here in GA are typically very similar to your own. Almost as if my traffic is being routed all the way to Seattle area and then on to it's destination from there.


p110011

join:2001-12-29
Oregon City, OR

reply to w0g
Here's my Traceroute if it helps....

traceroute to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com (209.131.36.158), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 mywimax (192.168.15.1) 1.995 ms 1.306 ms 1.290 ms
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 96-25-64-2.war.clearwire-wmx.net (96.25.64.2) 74.937 ms 127.244 ms 88.820 ms
4 64.13.115.161 (64.13.115.161) 92.959 ms 72.456 ms 93.531 ms
5 six.yahoo.com (206.81.80.98) 88.813 ms 87.402 ms 68.616 ms
6 so-2-1-0.pat1.pao.yahoo.com (216.115.110.42) 108.289 ms 106.932 ms 118.578 ms
7 ae1-p150.msr2.sp1.yahoo.com (216.115.107.77) 113.536 ms ae1-p140.msr1.sp1.yahoo.com (216.115.107.53) 112.393 ms ae0-p140.msr1.sp1.yahoo.com (216.115.107.49) 166.967 ms
8 te-8-1.bas-a2.sp1.yahoo.com (209.131.32.19) 106.807 ms te-9-1.bas-a1.sp1.yahoo.com (209.131.32.21) 102.195 ms te-9-1.bas-a2.sp1.yahoo.com (209.131.32.23) 101.791 ms
9 www.yahoo.com (209.131.36.158) 107.020 ms 105.096 ms 108.469 ms
Trace complete

My VOIP works well, but I'm not a gamer. Hope the Clear techs can fix this.....

stuckpixel

join:2008-07-23
Charlotte, NC
reply to w0g
Are you using the latest Skype? Mine sucked on Clearwire 3G then I upgraded Skype and it sounded perfect(on3G). Now on 4G no issues at all...

phaqu

join:2005-05-26
Marietta, GA
reply to knighthawktf
said by knighthawktf :

YAlmost as if my traffic is being routed all the way to Seattle area and then on to it's destination from there.
I believe thats because it is.


w0g
o.O

join:2001-08-30
Portland, OR
clubs:
·Clearwire Wireless

reply to w0g
Probably, but he says he's in GA!? If he's in the northwest, most traffic is routed to Seattle because it's the largest major peering point on the westcoast outside of California.
--
www.aimless.us - irc.aimless.us channel #fix

phaqu

join:2005-05-26
Marietta, GA

said by w0g See Profile :

Probably, but he says he's in GA!? If he's in the northwest, most traffic is routed to Seattle because it's the largest major peering point on the westcoast outside of California.
My first hop is to Kirkland WA.


knighthawktf

@clearwire-wmx.net

reply to w0g
Mine is as well phaqu

I don't know why they wouldn't peer their ATL or southeastern traffic in general @ 56 Marietta st. downtown where just about everyone else does. Perhaps they will straighten this out with future expansion, seem lame to send my our traffic across ~2500+ miles and then on to it's destination.

Automate

join:2001-06-26
Atlanta, GA
·Comcast

reply to phaqu
said by phaqu See Profile :

said by w0g See Profile :

Probably, but he says he's in GA!? If he's in the northwest, most traffic is routed to Seattle because it's the largest major peering point on the westcoast outside of California.
My first hop is to Kirkland WA.
And I thought it was bad when Atlanta traffic between Comcast and AT&T was gong through Dallas »IP traffic between Comcast and AT&T going through Dallas


w0g
o.O

join:2001-08-30
Portland, OR
clubs:
·Clearwire Wireless

reply to w0g
Don't get me wrong this was meant to be constructive critisism for Clear and others. The service is really fast and great for web surfing and downloads, VoIP isn't THAT bad, and gaming is much better than EVDO or UTMS. Glad to have it.
--
www.aimless.us - irc.aimless.us channel #fix

phaqu

join:2005-05-26
Marietta, GA

said by w0g See Profile :

Don't get me wrong this was meant to be constructive critisism for Clear and others. The service is really fast and great for web surfing and downloads, VoIP isn't THAT bad, and gaming is much better than EVDO or UTMS. Glad to have it.
I dont think anyone is taking you the wrong way. Im just saying that I have the same issue, only more extreme. I would love to have just a 65ms ping time. Mine is usually in the high 100ms to low 200 ms range.

As I understand it,and I may be wrong, if Atlanta traffic is routed to WA state first, that means connecting to a server here in Atlanta is around a 5-6 thousand mile one way hike (from ATL to WA back to a server here in ATL),and again, correct me if Im wrong, a 10,000 to 12,000 mile round trip (to a server that may be physically 5 miles away), since it would have to be sent back to WA before coming back to my comp.. That could be the cause of our latency problem here in the east coast. But,... Im just guessing.

I do know that a friend of mine (hard core gamer) has just dropped Clear (last week) because of the latency issue.

Automate

join:2001-06-26
Atlanta, GA
Can you post the results of a trace route to an Atlanta IP address? Say

tracert 68.86.106.46

phaqu

join:2005-05-26
Marietta, GA

Click for full size
said by Automate See Profile :

Can you post the results of a trace route to an Atlanta IP address? Say

tracert 68.86.106.46
Im assuming you meant from me.

Automate

join:2001-06-26
Atlanta, GA
·Comcast

96.25.160.2 and 68.86.85.233 are in Atlanta, the location information for the four address between them:
75.94.255.161
66.162.21.1
66.192.243.130
68.86.86.141
are not consistent but from the ping times it does not seem as though they are on the west coast.


Solearth

join:2009-10-21
Lubbock, TX

reply to w0g
w0g
Your download and upload numbers are far higher than Clear provides to me on my unlimited plan. That same test only measures 2 Mb/s down and 0.25 Mb/s upload, ping 85ms.
Oddly enough, the testing servers think I am in Kileen TX, but I am in Lubbock TX. That is about 350 miles away.

Clear offers a voice plan, but with their latency issues, I assume that it is substandard (unless they are removing the excessive latency ONLY for those who purchase THEIR voice package).

Uncompressed VOIP (G711) seems to be tolerable on Clear, but G729 compressed (eg Nettalk TK6000) is totally useless and badly garbled (as if there is any such thing as goodly garbled). Strangely enough, If my VOIP ATA is hooked up directly to my Clear Modem, the line indicator lights go out after about 20 minutes. Even Magic Jack puts up a message to reconnect to the internet. However, if I hook up my VOIP after my Netgear router, the service stays on. It seems that Clear is deliberately blocking communication ports, but my router re-routes the signals through different ports that it can find open. However it is only my theory until I can find evidence to prove or disprove the reasons behind blocked ports.

Jet101
Jet101
Premium
join:2009-10-01
Pflugerville, TX

said by Solearth See Profile :

Clear offers a voice plan, but with their latency issues, I assume that it is substandard (unless they are removing the excessive latency ONLY for those who purchase THEIR voice package).
WiMAX has the ability to do great QOS, and I suspect that Clear Voice gets top priority. No complaints on my 3 week old Clear Voice. However, I think that there must be something going on with the residential modem when it comes to any voip service other than Clear's.

I've tried everything to get a remote extension working that when plugged into any other internet service works like a charm. I cannot for the life of me get it to work with the Motorola CPEi 150 modem. I have run it straight into the modem and configured and re-configured every possible setting in that modem to try and get it to work. No luck to date. The extension registers with my asterisk server, but won't even pretend to make a call.

This irks me, as I had wanted to tie some Clear Wimax service into remote extensions out in the field for remote phone service. What's strange, is that I can use a softphone with the Clear USB modem, but cannot use that same softphone with the residential modem. I've tried this with an ip phone plugged directly into the modem, with switches, and with routers. Nothing works. Oh well, I won't be offering Clear internet for my customers that want remote phone service in their temporary field offices.


Solearth

join:2009-10-21
Lubbock, TX

reply to w0g
Their VOIP (SPA2102) plugs into the residential modem for the clear voice. The problem is NOT in the Motorola modem itself, but in a configuration out of control of the customer. I assume that they deliberately create a latency issue in those who do not pay additional for their own voice service.

If I am wrong about the deliberate latency in those who do not pay extra, then ALL of their modems, including those in which are used for the Clear Voice have the voice problem.

ITTech

join:2005-11-15
Dallas, TX

2 edits
reply to Solearth
reposting

ITTech

join:2005-11-15
Dallas, TX
reply to Solearth

turn logging features "on" in your router and proof them.
-
Forums » Wireless/Mobile Connectivity » Clearwire[ Equipment] clear voip adapter locked? »
« [General] Read the fine print!!!  


Saturday, 28-Nov 23:47:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [71] Weekend Open Thread
· [70] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· Why does it take so long? Mail question [General Questions]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 6 released! [TekSavvy]
· So where do we level weapon skill now? [World of Warcraft]
· evicted roaches [Home Repair & Improvement]