<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[ DrTCP - XP64]  Tweak Advice? in Broadband Tweaks</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r23275421</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:10:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP - XP64]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23305064</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : My line stats with ICMP disabled.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/linequality/nil/2583589">/linequality/nil/2583589</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23305064</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:21:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP - XP64]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23292409</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/580037"><b>Tursiops_G</b></A> : I've never seen Windows XP's (alleged) 'Dynamic' RWIN to actually do much of anything... I've always had better results by Manually 'Tweaking' the TCP/IP stack (such as with Dr.TCP, etc.).  ;)<br><br>I've never seen any real benefit from having Time Stamping enabled myself (I have Cable Internet service), but I understand that enabling Time Stamping may be beneficial with High-LATENCY services, such as Satellite (and possibly some Wireless providers...?)<br><br>There is No "One Size Fits All" when it comes to setting your RWIN... Using Even Multiples of your MSS (1460 in your case), is recommended for best Efficiency.<br><br>Most folks find an RWIN somewhere in the range of (MSS * 44) thru (MSS * 176) to be the "Sweet Spot", but note that having *Too* Large of an RWIN can actually Degrade performance... Start conservatively, and go up from there (I'd suggest MSS * 22 Increments)... When further increasing the RWIN doesn't make much of a difference, Go with the Smallest RWIN that still provides the best speeds.<br><br>HTH,<br><br> -Tursiops_G.<br><small>--<br>If You're Unsure, "RTFM"... If You're SURE, "RTFM" Anyway. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23292409</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:33:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP - XP64]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23290383</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/177643"><b>Irish Shark</b></A> : I have no idea where that FAQ came from. The MS Knowledge Base says the same thing. Before Vista, XP was the OS with the most tweaking requests.<br><br>Lower your RWIN to 18000 and run a couple speed tests and see what you get.<br><br>As far as the time stamping goes, I have not seen any measurable speed change one way or the other. <br><small>--<br>"You can observe a lot by watching". Yogi Berra</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23290383</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:49:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP - XP64]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288521</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : Another interesting read here: &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/tweaks">Tweaking FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/5438">What is the default RWIN setting in Windows XP Home &amp; Pro?</A><br>If the values are dynamic and NOT static, isn't this like Vista where the RWIN is dynamically changed? Why would Dr.TCP be needed if this is the case?<br>UPDATE: &raquo;<A HREF="/tweakr/block:270bacb?service=cable&speed=10000&os=winXP&via=normal">/tweakr/block:&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288521</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:44:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288465</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : This is my new Tweak result:  &raquo;<A HREF="/tweakr/block:879870?service=cable&speed=10000&os=winXP&via=normal">/tweakr/block:&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><A HREF="http://speedtest.dslreports.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.dslreports.com/im/81202241/27777.png" border=0></a><br><A HREF="http://speedtest.dslreports.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.dslreports.com/im/81202273/57093.png" border=0></a><br>Speed jumped up somewhat! But that could be any combination of things... time of day... different server... whatever. Page responce time does seem noticably snappier!  :o<br>I guess if you look at the advanced info by clicking on the link below on that page it gives you a better idea?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288465</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:49:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288272</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : Did not mean to overlook your post  Tursiops_G <A HREF="/useremail/u/580037"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>!  :p Okay, I will try changing the RWIN and Time Stamping options. What  I still don't fully understand is why time stamping should be disabled with an RWIN higher than 65535?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288272</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:07:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288253</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Irish Shark <A HREF="/useremail/u/177643"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><b>Time Stamping:</b><br><br> The need for Time Stamping seems to be in question, at least with RWIN under 65535. If you have a line where latency varies a lot, or a "long fat pipe" (for example, pure satellite connection), then Time Stamping should be beneficial, so experiment with it. Time Stamping "Defaults" to off (same as No).<br><br>I just leave it set to default and let The Doctor do what ever it does.<br> </div>Thanks  Irish Shark <A HREF="/useremail/u/177643"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>. I also read the entire FAQ on this.<br>Since my RWIN is above 65535, that was why I enabled it as per this very recommendation. So you are saying perhaps I should go against the recommendation? DEFAULT = OFF<br>I'm only curious as from what I understand, the guidelines say you may benefit from having it enabled with an RWIN of 65535+<br><b>NOTE:</b> I also re-editted my original post and re-posted my results as my TweakTest has been discarded by the site.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23288253</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:59:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23284720</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/177643"><b>Irish Shark</b></A> : <b>Time Stamping:</b><br><br> The need for Time Stamping seems to be in question, at least with RWIN under 65535. If you have a line where latency varies a lot, or a "long fat pipe" (for example, pure satellite connection), then Time Stamping should be beneficial, so experiment with it. Time Stamping "Defaults" to off (same as No).<br><br>I just leave it set to default and let The Doctor do what ever it does.<br><small>--<br>"You can observe a lot by watching". Yogi Berra</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23284720</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:32:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23284649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : Thanks for the input!  :)<br>The reason why I enabled time stamping was because from my understanding... if may help improve packet loss over a long FAT connection? Perhaps I misunderstood. I shall try disabling this and changing the RWIN.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23284649</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:22:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ DrTCP]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23276813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/580037"><b>Tursiops_G</b></A> : Looks OK...<br><br>Your RWIN is a Whole Multiple of your MSS (1460 * 65 = 94900)... Good.<br><br>Just for grins, Try an RWIN of 128480 (1460 * 88), and set the RFC1323 Time Stamping setting to OFF (disabled), and see if that offers any further improvement over what you have right now...<br><br> -Tursiops_G.<br><small>--<br>If You're Unsure, "RTFM"... If You're SURE, "RTFM" Anyway. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23276813</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:18:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[ DrTCP - XP64]  Tweak Advice?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23275421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/777093"><b>Dustyn</b></A> : Just wondered if anyone has some good advice for tweaking this connection? I'm kinda confused on what to enter for good values into DR.TCP.<br><br><b>UPDATE:</b> &raquo;<A HREF="/tweakr/block:39c7ae9?service=cable&speed=10000&os=winXP&via=normal">/tweakr/block:&middot;&middot;&middot;a=normal</A><br><br>This is what I applied and the results the TweakTest has provided. Seems okay?<br><A HREF="http://speedtest.dslreports.com"><IMG SRC="http://www.dslreports.com/im/81054400/80812.png" border=0></a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,23275421</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:26:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
