http://www.dslreports.com/forum/OC-Whats-faster-23276828 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:21:38 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:21:38 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23312175 said by Vamp:

I know that you can have a better balance with better quality ram but whatever...

What's faster:
1) slower clock with ram at 1600 and aggressive timing.
2) faster clock with ram under 1600 with aggressive timing
3) faster clock with fast over 1600 ram and slow timing

Oh and it's for Core i7 920 D0
clock speed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timings.
timings means absolutely nothing now
--
Somnambulator - t3h 5133pw41k3r


~Choosy moms choose Jif~]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23312175 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:44:33 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23299830
For example,

If you do something where you have vast amounts of physical memory and you need very fast access to the data (think about some kind of time sensitive application's response [ie. Arbitrage]; #3 would likely be your best bet.

If you are doing intensive computational processes (ie, calculating Pi to the 1 billionth decimal, then pure CPU is likely the best bet.

If your requirements are just a nice generally good middle of the road machine, then #1 is perhaps what you want to do.
--
---Barney]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23299830 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:33:36 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23287925 said by HRM:

it is all relative. How much faster is faster? First as stated is always slower. FSB is king, and lowering timings to get a much faster FSB will be best.
Yeap I relaxed my timing to about 10,10,10,26 and I can run 250 more Mhz on my corei7.
It sure helps a lot in rendering.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23287925 Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:27:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23280633 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23280633 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:51:30 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23280608
I would say #3 would be best... Benches should tell you the truth though]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-OC-Whats-faster-23280608 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:46:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/OC-Whats-faster-23276828
What's faster:
1) slower clock with ram at 1600 and aggressive timing.
2) faster clock with ram under 1600 with aggressive timing
3) faster clock with fast over 1600 ram and slow timing

Oh and it's for Core i7 920 D0
--
20/20 FIOS || MSN Msgr: scott001^gmail_com]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/OC-Whats-faster-23276828 Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:24:09 EDT