 lcnoble
join:2006-11-11 Nancy, KY | reply to tankabbot5 Re: Onyone else on call 24/7 365?
Awh. poor babies. I am a parent! |
|
  Matt Take me down to the paradise city Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| said by lcnoble :Awh. poor babies. I am a parent! Most of us are as well.  |
|
  OmenQ Spazz Premium join:2003-03-21 Continuum clubs: 
| reply to tankabbot5 A few years ago, the company got tired of paying me 5-10 hours of overtime per week, or coming in at 10 because I was working from home for 3 hours the night before. They put me on a salary and gave me a blackberry. Since then, I've had 10 days "off". 7 were when I went out of the country on a cruise ship for a week with my wife. The other 3 were my wedding weekend. Other than that, even if I take a vacation day, I'm answering questions and solving issues from my phone. They almost pay me enough for it, though I guess it's enough that I haven't complained about it too much yet. It might help that I don't yet have kids, and no one complains when I come in at 9 AM anymore. -- Cogito Ergo Nom |
|
  Boricua65
join:2002-01-26 Puerto Rico | reply to tankabbot5 Nope. I haven't work a 24/7 365 job at all, and I've been doing this for over 10 years. |
|
  Simba7
join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT | reply to tankabbot5 Last time I was on call 24/7 365 was in the Navy.
..ahh.. The life of an Information Systems Technician. |
|
 cmaenginsb Premium,MVM join:2001-03-19 Palmdale, CA
| reply to tankabbot5 Christmas day in the rain on a radio tower because the company couldn't spend 6k for a spare radio.
Every job I've had has pretty much been 24/7/365 unless I'm on PTO and I switch the phone off. In hawaii with two phones going, you get the picture. -- CCNA, Comtrain Certified Tower Climber |
|
  Drex Beer..It's What's For Dinner Premium join:2000-02-24 La Place, LA
·AT&T Southeast
| reply to tankabbot5 Never have been 24/7 365, but I was on a pager rotation for quite a number of years. I didn't mind it so much b/c I was compensated. It was straight time, but paid nonetheless. -- I gave up drinking and eating bad food. And in 14 days, I had lost 2 weeks. |
|
  Nightfall My Goal Is To Deny Yours Premium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
·Site5.com
| reply to nixen said by nixen :said by Nightfall :All in all, being on call isn't a problem if your IT department is well funded and you have the skills. Or you aren't supporting customers that INSIST on using broken technology (*cough* SunCluster *cough*). Or insist on using unsupported storage and ignoring when they're told it's heading for a massive failure (nothing like, four months later, watching a million-dollar/day site go down for three days because they ignored you). Or having customers with root access on their hosted systems. Thats what being well funded and having the skills is all about. If you have those two things, you should not be supporting broken technology or insist on using unsupported storage. If you have the skills, you should not have customers with root access on their hosted systems either.
Having the skills is one thing, but finding the right company is another. Many organizations out there see IT as a money sink. -- My domain - Nightfall.net |
|
  Drex Beer..It's What's For Dinner Premium join:2000-02-24 La Place, LA
·AT&T Southeast
| said by Nightfall :Thats what being well funded and having the skills is all about. If you have those two things, you should not be supporting broken technology or insist on using unsupported storage. If you have the skills, you should not have customers with root access on their hosted systems either. Having the skills is one thing, but finding the right company is another. Many organizations out there see IT as a money sink. Try being a contractor for the government some time.  -- I gave up drinking and eating bad food. And in 14 days, I had lost 2 weeks. |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to Nightfall said by Nightfall :said by nixen :Or you aren't supporting customers that INSIST on using broken technology (*cough* SunCluster *cough*). Or insist on using unsupported storage and ignoring when they're told it's heading for a massive failure (nothing like, four months later, watching a million-dollar/day site go down for three days because they ignored you). Or having customers with root access on their hosted systems. Thats what being well funded and having the skills is all about. If you have those two things, you should not be supporting broken technology or insist on using unsupported storage. If you have the skills, you should not have customers with root access on their hosted systems either. Thanks for paying attention and your helpful input. However: •when one is in the SERVICES industry, you really don't have a freaking choice in the matter. •When one works in services corporations where the sales team dictates what customers can put in your data centers and get support on, you really don't have a freaking choice in the matter. •When one works in services corporations where "technically correct" is ignored in favor of the next sale, you don't really have a freaking choice in the matter
You can have all the freaking skills in the world. You can work in a rather well-funded corporation with global operations and Fortune 50 customers. However, when you're supporting OUTSIDE, paying customers, none of that makes a goddamned difference. Try it sometime. It's BOATLOADS of fun.
said by Nightfall :Having the skills is one thing, but finding the right company is another. Many organizations out there see IT as a money sink. Well, there's "IT" and then there's computer services (consulting, hosting, etc.) Services are a RADICALLY different animal than "IT". Very few people that see themselves as competent in the nice, safe coccoon of the "IT" world could either cut it (both be able to survive or be truly useful) in the services or high-end consulting world.
Now, if you weren't trying to be as pompous as what your post came across as, I'll pre-apologize for what felt like an appropriate tone with my response. -- The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell |
|
  rfnut Premium join:2002-04-27 Fisher, IL
·Mediacom
| reply to Drex said by Drex :Try being a contractor for the government some time. I heard that...... after being up since 2AM this morning due to a call. |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to Drex said by Drex :Try being a contractor for the government some time. Don't even get me started on that. It's not so much that the government pays $400 for toilet seats as that things get bought and never used. Literally, there are multimillion-dollar systems bought that sit in storage/warehouses, unused, for YEARS. Basically, they're forgotten until the vendors come by to sell their new generation of computers and offer credit towards that purchase on the trade-ins of the LAST batch of never used systems. And that's only the smallest part of the frustrations of working in the government space. -- The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell |
|
 kubus
join:2000-12-22 Irwin, PA | reply to tankabbot5 I used to support data center at a bank. When a FedEx package showed up at my house's door with hardware parts for the AS/400, I fixed it... but on Monday I put my two weeks notice. They pay me for 40 hours, salary or not, rest is mine. |
|
  Nightfall My Goal Is To Deny Yours Premium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
·Site5.com
| reply to nixen said by nixen :said by Nightfall :said by nixen :Or you aren't supporting customers that INSIST on using broken technology (*cough* SunCluster *cough*). Or insist on using unsupported storage and ignoring when they're told it's heading for a massive failure (nothing like, four months later, watching a million-dollar/day site go down for three days because they ignored you). Or having customers with root access on their hosted systems. Thats what being well funded and having the skills is all about. If you have those two things, you should not be supporting broken technology or insist on using unsupported storage. If you have the skills, you should not have customers with root access on their hosted systems either. Thanks for paying attention and your helpful input. However: •when one is in the SERVICES industry, you really don't have a freaking choice in the matter. •When one works in services corporations where the sales team dictates what customers can put in your data centers and get support on, you really don't have a freaking choice in the matter. •When one works in services corporations where "technically correct" is ignored in favor of the next sale, you don't really have a freaking choice in the matter
You can have all the freaking skills in the world. You can work in a rather well-funded corporation with global operations and Fortune 50 customers. However, when you're supporting OUTSIDE, paying customers, none of that makes a goddamned difference. Try it sometime. It's BOATLOADS of fun. said by Nightfall :Having the skills is one thing, but finding the right company is another. Many organizations out there see IT as a money sink. Well, there's "IT" and then there's computer services (consulting, hosting, etc.) Services are a RADICALLY different animal than "IT". Very few people that see themselves as competent in the nice, safe coccoon of the "IT" world could either cut it (both be able to survive or be truly useful) in the services or high-end consulting world. Now, if you weren't trying to be as pompous as what your post came across as, I'll pre-apologize for what felt like an appropriate tone with my response. Oh, I wasn't trying to be pompous and I didn't get any gist of an inappropriate tone from you. I think we are trying to compare apples to oranges here to be honest. I am talking about being part of an IT department. You are talking about being part of a services team. Services is a much different animal, you are right on that. Especially hosting and consulting services.
Even so, if you are working in hosting and consulting, you are paid to inherit those problems from poorly running companies who made mistakes in purchasing technology. This could be because their IT departments or technologically incompetent IT people couldn't implement things correctly or support them correctly. In that case, you are 100% correct, you are in a crappy situation that really you can't get out of. Apparently, I thought you were talking about being part of an IT department in an established company, so thats my mistake.
When you look at an IT department in an established company.....
The company doesn't make a move to a piece of software or hardware without the blessing of IT. In fact, its IT that does the work on evaluating these products and determining the best course of action. Its IT's job to bring these evaluations to the company management and make a strong recommendation.
Remember, I said being in the right company with the right IT team with the right skills? Thats what I am stating in a nutshell.
The problem today is that IT is seen as a money sink and too many people are concentrating on just keeping things running. They are technically proficient people without any knowledge of business or customer service. In fact, most IT people HATE customer service and speaking to management who are considered idiots.
The new IT departments are made of professionals who are not only technically inclined, but in tune with the business. They make business proposals for technology that affect the entire company. The management sees these proposals and makes the appropriate decisions based on what IT recommends.
Just as you said....
quote: Well, there's "IT" and then there's computer services (consulting, hosting, etc.) Services are a RADICALLY different animal than "IT". Very few people that see themselves as competent in the nice, safe coccoon of the "IT" world could either cut it (both be able to survive or be truly useful) in the services or high-end consulting world.
I will 100% agree with you here. Consulting and working in an IT department in a business are two different things. On the flip side, there are many high end consulting people who just wouldn't cut it in IT in an established organization. Sure, they have the expertise, but they lack key functions such as business sense, customer service, and working in a team (just to name a few).
I know, not everyone falls into place that easily, just pointing out that some people are destined to be in one camp or the other for the most part. -- My domain - Nightfall.net |
|
  NetAdmin CCNA
join:2008-05-22
| reply to lcnoble said by lcnoble :Awh. poor babies. I am a parent! Let me know when you are on the hook to drive to any number of locations across half of a state. Big difference. -- Kilroy was here |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| reply to Nightfall said by Nightfall :Even so, if you are working in hosting and consulting, you are paid to inherit those problems from poorly running companies who made mistakes in purchasing technology. That was part of why standard builds and standard hardware were part of the "standard offerings". Unfortunately, when customers had big enough pocket books, the sales teams would get the executives to override standards. For example, this was how we got a ton of A5200s in our farms, even though our prior evaluations had DQ'ed them as being part of a standard offering. With the standard cluster offerings, root access was specifically denied customers. Again, sales ended up getting this overridden (and people with root who don't know clustering is REALLY bad juju). As things got further an further away from standard offerings, support costs went up and up, and management was like "why do we need more, costly personnel??
said by Nightfall :Apparently, I thought you were talking about being part of an IT department in an established company, so thats my mistake.
Unfortunately, services - consulting and hosting services - tend to get lumped under IT. Most people external to the industry tend to lump it all together as being "those computer guys". But, because they have no understanding and want to sound technical, they say "IT".
said by Nightfall :When you look at an IT department in an established company..... The company doesn't make a move to a piece of software or hardware without the blessing of IT. In fact, its IT that does the work on evaluating these products and determining the best course of action. Its IT's job to bring these evaluations to the company management and make a strong recommendation. In big/established companies, it's typically the engineering groups that do the evaluations. Engineering is frequently related to the IT group(s) but definitely a different organizational unit.
said by Nightfall :Remember, I said being in the right company with the right IT team with the right skills? Thats what I am stating in a nutshell. Unfortunately, IT tends to be very much the red headed stepchild of the computer industry. So, it's rather rare for the above to happen. If it did, consultants and other services organizations wouldn't exist.
said by Nightfall :The problem today is that IT is seen as a money sink and too many people are concentrating on just keeping things running. They are technically proficient people without any knowledge of business or customer service. In fact, most IT people HATE customer service and speaking to management who are considered idiots. Well... That would probably be "IT" in the broad sense. 
said by Nightfall :The new IT departments are made of professionals who are not only technically inclined, but in tune with the business. "Technically inclined" would tend to be in the very most tangential sense of the term.
said by Nightfall :They make business proposals for technology that affect the entire company. The management sees these proposals and makes the appropriate decisions based on what IT recommends. And typically their background is business first with a couple of classes/courses or presentations/seminars that give them their basis of technical inclination. Their IT familiarity tends to be at a very distant view of things.
said by Nightfall :I will 100% agree with you here. Consulting and working in an IT department in a business are two different things. On the flip side, there are many high end consulting people who just wouldn't cut it in IT in an established organization. Sure, they have the expertise, but they lack key functions such as business sense, customer service, and working in a team (just to name a few). I'd tend to equate that more with "operations" personnel. People with no business sense or customer service rarely make good consultants. Not that "good consultants" are terribly common...
said by Nightfall :I know, not everyone falls into place that easily, just pointing out that some people are destined to be in one camp or the other for the most part. That's like saying things are black and white. People fall across the continuum - though it's rather a "lumpy" distribution curve. -- The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell |
|
  Nightfall My Goal Is To Deny Yours Premium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
·Site5.com
| Excellent comments to my replies. I have to agree with all of them. I won't take the time to quote them, but I think that we both have a much better idea of what we are talking about now. Comparing the common services and consulting world with that of corporate IT departments really is an apples to oranges comparison. I have worked in both areas and can say that there are advantages and disadvantages to them both.
Corporate IT is changing and changing for the better. It will just take a long time to get away with what has become the status quo. The days of geeks in broom closets providing no customer support are on their way out. IT professionals with the business in mind who are educated and experienced are on their way in. -- My domain - Nightfall.net |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| said by Nightfall :IT professionals with the business in mind who are educated and experienced are on their way in. Until upper management sees the (apparent/up-front) pricetag of those professionals' salaries. There's a reason outsourcing exists and will continue to do so: most companies don't have enough need for those people to be always on payroll. Everyone wants the "break glass in case of emergency" calibre professional - be that operational, architectural, etc. - but very few want to pay for that kind of talent to sit around waiting for whatever constitutes an emergency. -- The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell |
|
  NetAdmin CCNA
join:2008-05-22
| said by nixen : Everyone wants the "break glass in case of emergency" calibre professional - be that operational, architectural, etc. - but very few want to pay for that kind of talent to sit around waiting for whatever constitutes an emergency. Getting the bill for having a group of SMEs coming into the enterprise to diagnose and clean up the issues are sometimes a powerful enough motivator to fix that. If the bean counters are afraid of paying salaries, they need to be made aware of the costs of bringing in consultants for those critical down situations. -- Kilroy was here |
|
  Nightfall My Goal Is To Deny Yours Premium,MVM join:2001-08-03 Grand Rapids, MI
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
·Site5.com
1 edit | reply to nixen said by nixen :said by Nightfall :IT professionals with the business in mind who are educated and experienced are on their way in. Until upper management sees the (apparent/up-front) pricetag of those professionals' salaries. There's a reason outsourcing exists and will continue to do so: most companies don't have enough need for those people to be always on payroll. Everyone wants the "break glass in case of emergency" calibre professional - be that operational, architectural, etc. - but very few want to pay for that kind of talent to sit around waiting for whatever constitutes an emergency. Paying for a break glass in case of emergency person to always be on staff is not worth it. Paying for educated and experienced IT people who are diverse in their experience as well as good with customer service pays for itself over time. The value to the business is not only their experience level, but their attitude and work ethic they bring.
The way some IT departments are run these days are very sickening to me. Managers who don't know IT managing an IT department. People in IT who don't have the skills or experience in IT running systems they don't know how to support. The users getting substandard support. The list goes on and on.
IT has really only been around for the last 25 years or so. It has evolved radically and will continue to do so as technology changes. -- My domain - Nightfall.net |
|