<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property&#x27; in forum &#x27;Security&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23279924</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:29:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:29:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23308050</link>
<description><![CDATA[veloslave posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/398001" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=398001');">ZZZZZZZ</a>:</small><br><br>This is pretty pathetic considering it's not even a good program.<br> </div>Your knowledge of virus tools is what is pathetic in my opinion (and the opinions of the many people I work with)<br><br>I do virus removals daily and between combofix and Malwarebytes... they are the two best products out there.  Add on that it's free version is, well, FREE... that makes it a cannot beat.<br><br>Hopefully MWB kicks some donkey in this case.  China in general is getting pretty bad with hacking and such, them and their neighbors   :uhh:<br><small>--<br>Mom was right.... I NEED fiber!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23308050</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:10:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23305242</link>
<description><![CDATA[public posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/198350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=198350');">joako</a>:</small><br><br>Am I the only person that is bothered by key generators and cracks that don't do any harm to the computer, don't spread any virus/trojan but are still flagged by antivirus software? Even some software to extract the Windows product key is sometimes flagged!<br> </div>Funded whitelisting or blacklisting has been an issue with several vendors.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23305242</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:53:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23305233</link>
<description><![CDATA[public posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/793106" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=793106');">doppler</a>:</small><br><br>Good luck in getting results.<br><br>China:<br>A land where you can get "Garden" a $4 copy of Windows XP.<br> </div>For that amount you can get win7 ultimate even before it was generally available in the us.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23305233</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:45:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23303455</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/198350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=198350');">joako</a>:</small><br><br>Am I the only person that is bothered by key generators and cracks that don't do any harm to the computer, don't spread any virus/trojan but are still flagged by antivirus software? Even some software to extract the Windows product key is sometimes flagged!<br> </div>Count me in. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23303455</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:34:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23293215</link>
<description><![CDATA[David posted : Nice find!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23293215</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23292720</link>
<description><![CDATA[jabarnut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/260736" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=260736');">Vampirefo</a>:</small><br><br>MBAM claims seem unreal, not believable, something is just wrong with MBAM claims. I don't use either product but do find this interesting, MBAM appears as though they don't really know if IOBit has stolen their database or not.<br>....<br></div>Sorry, but I beg to differ. But then, perhaps you haven't read as much about it as I have.<br><br>I'll admit though, you may have a point when all is said and done. After all, the thought that some company based in China may be stealing Intellectual Property does seem a little bit far fetched.  <br>Why in the world would they do something like that?  :huh:<br><br>On the other hand, why would Malwarebytes bring such accusations, and stir up such a ruckus if they didn't feel they had some solid proof?<br>They've stated that they didn't take this lightly, and spent quite some time investigating before they went public with it.<br><br>Yes, time will tell for sure.<br>And I suspect time will tell that the IOBit bunch are a company of low life thieves.<br>If I end up being wrong, feel free to tell me "I told you so", when this fiasco is over with. <br><br>And that's all I have to say about that.<br><small>--<br>I had a life once.....now I have a Computer and a Modem.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23292720</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:24:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23292570</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kayrac posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/260736" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=260736');">Vampirefo</a>:</small><br><br>MBAM claims seem unreal, not believable, something is just wrong with MBAM claims. I don't use either product but do find this interesting, MBAM appears as though they don't really know if IOBit has stolen their database or not.<br><br>These little tests might impress some people but they don't impress me at all smoke and mirrors  If IOBit is really using MBAM database all MBAM has to do is open it, and read the contents and post them, but I noticed MBAM hasn't done that.<br><br>It seems to me MBAM is playing games trying to get people to distrust or dislike IOBit, I believe the samples where submitted by MBAM to IOBit, there is more to this story than what MBAM is letting us know.<br> </div>no way would a lawyer suggest that they release that information<br><br>but it could very well go that way, suppose we'll see in a few months/years depending how long it takes :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23292570</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:59:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23292402</link>
<description><![CDATA[Vampirefo posted : MBAM claims seem unreal, not believable, something is just wrong with MBAM claims. I don't use either product but do find this interesting, MBAM appears as though they don't really know if IOBit has stolen their database or not.<br><br>These little tests might impress some people but they don't impress me at all smoke and mirrors  If IOBit is really using MBAM database all MBAM has to do is open it, and read the contents and post them, but I noticed MBAM hasn't done that.<br><br>It seems to me MBAM is playing games trying to get people to distrust or dislike IOBit, I believe the samples where submitted by MBAM to IOBit, there is more to this story than what MBAM is letting us know.<br><small>--<br>Best Regards<br>Vampirefo<br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23292402</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:31:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23291994</link>
<description><![CDATA[Rebirth posted : PORN links via hxxp://www.iobit.com/naruto-hentai.html<br><br>Other links on this page take you to countless other REAL live porn www's and who knows what else.<br><br>UNBELIEVABLE !!!<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23291994?c=1486367&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI3OTkyNC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="45676 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=469 SRC="/r0/download/1486367.thumb600~7bf56751651d56edb989f7cfd64c0006/p.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23291994</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:12:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290487</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ben Cisco posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/989554" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=989554');">Blue2</a>:</small><br><br>In the '60s when shoplifting was for many an act of anti-establishment rebellion, we politely called it a "five finger discount". I guess you'd now call this "five finger marketing".<br> </div>More like "middle finger marketing"... :D<br><small>--<br><i>We should listen to reason instead and reject fear.</i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290487</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:05:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290438</link>
<description><![CDATA[MarkAW posted :    <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Krissy's Avatar  &#9;<br>Krissy Krissy is offline<br>A Lovely IObit Girl<br>&#9; <br>We have never used the database of any other companies. And hope Malwarebytes stop spreading malicious rumors for hyping itself. The ridiculousness: who will trust and depend on a security product that can NOT even protect itself?<br><br>A legal letter will be released later, which will prove that there is no problem with Intellectual Property Rights.<br><br><b>For the sake of avoiding dispute and possible problems, we have deleted all disputed items in our database temporarily, and have updated IObit Security 360&#146;s database.</b><br><br>Our database is from the online submission form: <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://db.iobit.com/deal/sdsubmit/index.php" >db.iobit.com/deal/sdsubmit/index.php</A><br>We also have many various sources of malware samples from warm-hearted users, computer security fans, and major security groups from all over the world. We have admitted that it&#146;s hard to avoid mistakes, like a silly or duplicated name. But there is in no way means we steal Malwarebytes&#146; or any other's database. We are investigating and tracking on those items which Malwarebytes declared stolen.<br><br>We have so many independent and objective reviewing tests and reports; everybody can download and view from the link: &raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.iobit.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25" >forums.iobit.com/forumdisplay.php?f=25</A>. We believe that, after viewing these test report, you can judge that if we steal database from Malwarebytes.<br><br>Thanks for the always support of IObit users.<br>__________________<br>I am pleased to help or discuss with you. Hope you like IObit products. <hr></blockquote><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4807" >forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4807</A><br><br>Ok if what MBAM claims is all bullshit why would IObit remove all<br>disputed items in their database temporarily? If they say MBAM is lying and they (IObit) haven't stolen anyone's database and used it in their product then why remove said database?<br><small>--<br>Sometimes we lose friends for whose loss our regret is greater than our grief, and others for whom our grief is greater than our regret.  Fran&ccedil;ois de la Rochefoucauld<br>Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window. - Steve Wozniak <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290438</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:59:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290208</link>
<description><![CDATA[TheJoker posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/197199" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=197199');">Doctor Four</a>:</small><br><br>True to form, a shill shows up. And it only took about 33 hours to do so.<br> </div>And notice that they joined the board just today to post as a shill within the first hour (joined today and post was at 12:42 AM).<br><br>I would go further than untrusted "security" vendor, and classify they as a rogue security vendor as others have previously been classified when they took other companies work, either the program interface or database.<br><small>--<br>Proud ASAP member since 2005<br>Microsoft MVP/Windows Security 2009</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290208</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:19:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290178</link>
<description><![CDATA[DrStrange posted : I wonder if the shill is posting from China?  I also wonder what would happen if I changed my sigfile to 'China out of Tibet!'.<br>;-)<br><br>I think the online community will deal with these people in their own way. In the early history of the country, one form of punishment for not conforming to community standards was to shun the offender. It looks like we're doing a good job of administering the 21st-century form of that sanction.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290178</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:13:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290100</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Four posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1686484" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1686484');">jpav</a>:</small><br><br>I am a solid IObit fans, don't believe they need to copy a competitor's work as they have all the necessary expertise at their own fingertips.<br> </div>True to form, a shill shows up. And it only took about 33 hours to do so.<br><br>No one on this site believes what you say.<br><br>How does it feel to work for an untrusted "security" vendor?<br><br>Because that's what IOBit has become as a result of their actions.<br><small>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23290100</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:00:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289961</link>
<description><![CDATA[jabarnut posted : IOBit has a new "Accusation Thread - Dispute" section in their Forums now.<br>For the most part, it looks pretty out of control over there. (Some of it reminds me of a mutiny at sea).<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4802" >forums.iobit.com/showthread.php?t=4802</A><br><br>Sure makes for some interesting reading though...(if you're really bored and feel like reading).<br>Especially when you read various Threads around other Forums as well (such as the Malwarebytes Forums), and get the whole picture from different perspectives.<br><br>One thing for sure, this whole thing sure has spread around pretty fast.  :D<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft%3Aen-US&q=IOBit+steals+Malwarebytes&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=" >www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=&middot;&middot;&middot;oq=&aqi=</A><br> <br><small>--<br>I had a life once.....now I have a Computer and a Modem.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289961</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:36:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289938</link>
<description><![CDATA[SafireDonkey posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/408621" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=408621');">redwolfe_98</a>:</small><br><br>i thought "iobit" had a good explanation and i don't believe that they are stealing malwarebytes' malware-definitions..<br><br>how would people get the dummy-files in the first place unless malwarebytes provided them to the person who had them?<br><br>maybe malwarebytes methodology was flawed, and fit with iobit's explanation:<br><br>someone ie malwarebytes submitted files to iobit; iobit adds definitions for the files; then, malwarebytes claims that iobit is flagging their dummy files and, so, concludes that iobit is stealing their malware-definitions, because iobit is flagging the dummy-files that malwarebytes submitted to them?<br> </div>You seem to be missing the point here. MalwareBytes didn't provide anyone any dummy file because they simply didn't exist untill malwarebytes found out about the duplicated detection bases. As soon as MB found out, they created an .exe file which would trigger the detection. So the cheaptalk about someone must have submitted blahblah doesn't make sense to start with, since at the time there was no dummy to "submit to us", it was only created when MalwareBytes had the clear evidence at hand, being the detection base from IObit (well lets call it theirs anyway) and the screenshots they took from IObit flagging their just created dummy perfectly as malwarebytes wanted it to show up. Malwarebytes can now create as much dummies for as much fake "nasties" as they want, what will the result be for the end-user ? Are we going to start downloading multiply MB's of detections containing 50% of fake ones for the sake of so-called security-companies stealing from and trashing each other ?<br><br>Lets get back the the AV way of making us believe any No-CD patch for big selling games is infected with any random virus they tell us, we're being manipulated since a long time, not for our security but for commercialism.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289938</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:33:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289859</link>
<description><![CDATA[zteardrop posted : Malwarebytes should think of this as they having opened a new office in China. Same great product.. for a fraction of the price.  :p<br><br>Intellectual property rights in China doesn't exist.<br><small>--<br>The official Norton Forum from Symantec: &raquo;<A HREF="http://community.norton.com/norton/" >community.norton.com/norton/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289859</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:20:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289830</link>
<description><![CDATA[rawwhide posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/281081" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=281081');">jakeydsl</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/195618" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=195618');">rawwhide</a>:</small><br><br>Download.com/Cnet still has their software up. </div>They also have an article up now...<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10389650-245.html" >news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10389650-245.html</A><br> </div>interesting....<br><br><div class="bquote">"Unfortunately, IObit database analyzer carelessly used the names provided by the submission. This mistake can be understood because it is very normal--Many enthusiastic IObit users find there are samples missed by IObit Security 360 but detected by other anti-malware products, then they would submit these samples to us and provide names defined by other anti-malware vendors."</div><br><small>--<br>To talk much and arrive nowhere is the same as climbing a tree to catch a fish.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289830</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:17:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289754</link>
<description><![CDATA[Graycode posted : The saga continues in a new thread from MalwareBytes.  It presents a few more details and more samples duplicated by IoBit's definitions.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=29772" >www.malwarebytes.org/forums/inde&middot;&middot;&middot;ic=29772</A><br><br>This part is interesting, though not surprising:<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Second, and far more importantly, if IObit has stolen not only our database but also the databases of other security vendors, as we strongly suspect they have, then of course their database would be larger. We have presented evidence of theft to other security vendors, although we will leave it to them to disclose information to the public.<br><hr></blockquote><br><br>I wonder if other security vendors will publicly confirm or deny whether IoBit has been stealing their work.  Most may choose to distance themselves from the issues.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23289754</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:04:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288922</link>
<description><![CDATA[jakeydsl posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/195618" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=195618');">rawwhide</a>:</small><br><br>Download.com/Cnet still has their software up. </div>They also have an article up now...<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10389650-245.html" >news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10389650-245.html</A><br><small>--<br>Jakey In Joisey - Tax and Corruption Capitol of the US</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288922</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:29:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288809</link>
<description><![CDATA[jabarnut posted : I noticed IOBit's Bolg (which I posted a link to yesterday), has changed significantly again today. (Seems it changes every time they can collectively come up with a new explanation).<br><br>After reading much of the thread in the Malwarebytes Forum, there is little doubt in my mind that the accusations are true.<br><br>What I'm seeing in IOBit's 'Declaration' looks like a pretty poor attempt at damage control...somehow I don't think it will work too well at this point.<br><br> I also just noticed that all of the comments at the end of the IOBit Declaration magically disappeared, and "Comments are closed" now...the majority of which were "anti-IOBit", and/or customers wanting to know what the heck was going on with this company, and demanding a satisfactory explanation.<br><small>--<br>I had a life once.....now I have a Computer and a Modem.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288809</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:48:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288730</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cudni posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/408621" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=408621');">redwolfe_98</a>:</small><br><br>someone ie malwarebytes submitted files to iobit; iobit adds definitions for the files; <br> </div>before adding submitted files should they not be analysed first to establish whether malicious or not?<br><br>Cudni<br><small>--<br>"what we know we know the same, what we don't know, we don't know it differently." <br>Help yourself so God can help you.<br>Microsoft MVP,  2006 - 2009</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288730</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:17:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288648</link>
<description><![CDATA[TheJoker posted : Did they have a good explanation for previously using HijackThis without authorization and labeling the log <i>Logfile of IObit HijackScan v1.0.0.0</i>? in addition to taking other people's work, the program is just plain bad. I've been helping people that had problems that suddenly went away as soon as their software was removed.<br><small>--<br>Proud ASAP member since 2005<br>Microsoft MVP/Windows Security 2009</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288648</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:25:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288629</link>
<description><![CDATA[redwolfe_98 posted : i thought "iobit" had a good explanation and i don't believe that they are stealing malwarebytes' malware-definitions..<br><br>how would people get the dummy-files in the first place unless malwarebytes provided them to the person who had them?<br><br>maybe malwarebytes methodology was flawed, and fit with iobit's explanation:<br><br>someone ie malwarebytes submitted files to iobit; iobit adds definitions for the files; then, malwarebytes claims that iobit is flagging their dummy files and, so, concludes that iobit is stealing their malware-definitions, because iobit is flagging the dummy-files that malwarebytes submitted to them?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288629</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 06:16:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288600</link>
<description><![CDATA[TheJoker posted : In addition, they earlier included Trend Micro's HijackThis without authorization, and produced a log that was labeled as their own, so using code from another vendor without authorization is a pattern for them.<br><small>--<br>Proud ASAP member since 2005<br>Microsoft MVP/Windows Security 2009</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288600</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:49:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288549</link>
<description><![CDATA[Blue2 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1686484" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1686484');">jpav</a>:</small><br><br>I am a solid IObit fans, don't believe they need to copy a competitor's work as they have all the necessary expertise at their own fingertips.<br> </div>If the allegations are true (and there's little reason to doubt Malwarebytes), you mean they have all the necessary expertise <strike>at</strike> <b>IN </b> their own fingertips. <br><br>In the '60s when shoplifting was for many an act of anti-establishment rebellion, we politely called it a "five finger discount". I guess you'd now call this "five finger marketing".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288549</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:40:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288265</link>
<description><![CDATA[hayc59 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1686484" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1686484');">jpav</a>:</small><br><br>I am a solid IObit fans, don't believe they need to copy a competitor's work as they have all the necessary expertise at their own fingertips.<br> </div>ahh, yes and I believe you completely....LOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288265</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:03:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288224</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kayrac posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1686484" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1686484');">jpav</a>:</small><br><br>I am a solid IObit fans, don't believe they need to copy a competitor's work as they have all the necessary expertise at their own fingertips.<br> </div>you also have 1 post, and registered at EARLIEST, 50minutes ago :)<br><br>credibility is not in your favor]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288224</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:51:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288192</link>
<description><![CDATA[jpav posted : I am a solid IObit fans, don't believe they need to copy a competitor's work as they have all the necessary expertise at their own fingertips.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288192</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:42:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288134</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mr Fel posted : I had no idea about IOBit until I just happened upon this thread in the ticker, looks like I'll be reading the security thread more often while I get rid of IOBit.<br><small>--<br>One time a person asked where the F button was on their keyboard. I told them they would find it next to the U button.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23288134</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:26:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23286474</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : The solution it to put keys in the database that make the IObits program detect itself and self destruct.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23286474</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:42:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23286304</link>
<description><![CDATA[David posted : I use their smart defrag, I wonder where they stole it from? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23286304</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:15:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23286209</link>
<description><![CDATA[rawwhide posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/198350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=198350');">joako</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/332558" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=332558');">Ryan</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/198350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=198350');">joako</a>:</small><br><br>Am I the only person that is bothered by key generators and cracks that don't do any harm to the computer, don't spread any virus/trojan but are still flagged by antivirus software? Even some software to extract the Windows product key is sometimes flagged!<br> </div> Yes. If they want to protect their own software then let them...<br> </div>It does not instill trust in any way. If a program is only "malicious" because it potentially harms the security software vendor's revenue stream (and Ok you installed your pirated antivirus HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET UPDATES... or are they saying their system was so weak no only could other vendors steal their definitions they can't even restrict their definition updates to active subscribers?).<br><br>Look, I am not saying I am for software piracy but what is the point of Anti* software? To detect * from my computer, nothing more. If I wanted MalwareBytes AntiKeyGenWare I would have bought that product, but I don't think anyone in their right mind would actually go out of their way to buy that sort of product. <br><br>What is next, will Anti* software start flagging competitors software? Terrorism is a threat to everyone, shouldn't Anti-* software mark alqaeda.com as a "Tojan" or something like that? Even if it doesn't, that website might be "harmful" <br> </div>The more they can detect then more they can claim to be better than the next guy in town. So they claim harmless programs as evil in order to make money. It's all about the bottom line.<br><br>p.s. and no you are not alone.<br><small>--<br>To talk much and arrive nowhere is the same as climbing a tree to catch a fish.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23286209</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:53:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23285470</link>
<description><![CDATA[james posted : Booohooo, our company flags keygens as viruses, in essence lying to our customers, and another company is stealing our definitions for these keygens and flagging them too.<br><br>The second I found out my av software was flagging things other than viruses/spyware I removed it from my system and demanded a refund and got it. I really don't care about their reasons, I value my privacy and they've proven they can't be trusted.<br><small>--<br>[BQUOTE=[user=Metatron2008]]But people who download thousands of movies and games.... Yes, they are as bad as any murderer[/BQUOTE]</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23285470</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:52:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23285159</link>
<description><![CDATA[joako posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/332558" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=332558');">Ryan</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/198350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=198350');">joako</a>:</small><br><br>Am I the only person that is bothered by key generators and cracks that don't do any harm to the computer, don't spread any virus/trojan but are still flagged by antivirus software? Even some software to extract the Windows product key is sometimes flagged!<br> </div> Yes. If they want to protect their own software then let them...<br> </div>It does not instill trust in any way. If a program is only "malicious" because it potentially harms the security software vendor's revenue stream (and Ok you installed your pirated antivirus HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET UPDATES... or are they saying their system was so weak no only could other vendors steal their definitions they can't even restrict their definition updates to active subscribers?).<br><br>Look, I am not saying I am for software piracy but what is the point of Anti* software? To detect * from my computer, nothing more. If I wanted MalwareBytes AntiKeyGenWare I would have bought that product, but I don't think anyone in their right mind would actually go out of their way to buy that sort of product. <br><br>What is next, will Anti* software start flagging competitors software? Terrorism is a threat to everyone, shouldn't Anti-* software mark alqaeda.com as a "Tojan" or something like that? Even if it doesn't, that website might be "harmful" <br><small>--<br>PRescott7-2097</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23285159</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:58:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284941</link>
<description><![CDATA[ZZZZZZZ posted : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.iobit.com/avg-com.html" >www.iobit.com/avg-com.html</A><br><br>This alone tells me everything I want to know about IObit,shelling for 1 of the worst anti-virus programs,you can ever install.<br><small>--<br><b>~~Get our troops home...now!!~~</b></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284941</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:26:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284893</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/197199" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=197199');">Doctor Four</a>:</small><br><br>Next thing you know they will get shills to post here and at Malwarebytes trying to defend their software as legitimate.<br><br>It's a common pattern; one which is seen all the time in the Spam, Scam and Phishbusters forum.<br> </div>After reading through the forums there I am surprised they have not shown up here en masse.<br><small>--<br>"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."<br><br>Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.venganza.org" >www.venganza.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284893</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:13:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284690</link>
<description><![CDATA[MADx posted : Funny just the other day WOT had Iobit in the green and McAffe siteadvisor had it in the red, and people was complaining to McAffe about how Iobit was such great software and should not be in the red. Now WOT has in the yellow. News travel fast on the web. Iobit had me fooled, but I notice while using their Advance System Care that some parts of it look similar to CCleaner, Hijack This, and SpywareBlaster. I was using Iobit Game booster and Smart Defrag, but I switch back to Defraggler, CCleaner, and BlackViper's website to free up memory by turning off unnecessary services. I didn't know Iobit originated from China, that alone would of set off my alarms.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284690</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:28:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284572</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ryan posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/198350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=198350');">joako</a>:</small><br><br>Am I the only person that is bothered by key generators and cracks that don't do any harm to the computer, don't spread any virus/trojan but are still flagged by antivirus software? Even some software to extract the Windows product key is sometimes flagged!<br> </div> Yes. If they want to protect their own software then let them...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284572</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:09:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284560</link>
<description><![CDATA[joako posted : Am I the only person that is bothered by key generators and cracks that don't do any harm to the computer, don't spread any virus/trojan but are still flagged by antivirus software? Even some software to extract the Windows product key is sometimes flagged!<br><small>--<br>PRescott7-2097</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284560</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:07:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284226</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"> ...rather than a simple public uprising.<br> </div>well this simple member of the public just removed Smart Defrag in protest]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284226</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:03:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284193</link>
<description><![CDATA[Blue2 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/197199" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=197199');">Doctor Four</a>:</small><br><br>Next thing you know they will get shills to post here and at Malwarebytes trying to defend their software as legitimate.<br> </div>Disinformation has been around for a long time and it isn't likely to stop. Don't be surprised by anything, including  attempts to "defend" by attempting to discredit Malwarebytes. (That's a reason why complete anonymity on the internet isn't always a good thing.  It can also provide the opportunity for drive-by defamation and character assassination.) <br><br>Setting up a fake dummy file to catch them displaying the same fake file was a good strategy. I just hope that now that the cat is out of the bag, they've already collected sufficient proof from a legal standpoint. Contacting an attorney promptly is undoubtedly the best step rather than a simple public uprising.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23284193</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:53:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283987</link>
<description><![CDATA[rawwhide posted : Download.com/Cnet still has their software up. This isn't any different than say reading a website and then paraphrasing on your own website. I can't believe that none of these malware detection companies do not look at and use parts, pieces, or even whole segments of competitors definition database.  Eventually all malware companies have definitions that are identical or almost identical and detect the same malware. Why is that?<br><small>--<br>To talk much and arrive nowhere is the same as climbing a tree to catch a fish.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283987</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:15:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283942</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Four posted : Next thing you know they will get shills to post here and at Malwarebytes trying to defend their software as legitimate.<br><br>It's a common pattern; one which is seen all the time in the Spam, Scam and Phishbusters forum.<br><small>--<br>"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283942</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:09:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283862</link>
<description><![CDATA[jabarnut posted : Agreed...(and sarcasm noted).  ;)<br><br>It's also interesting to note that the Blog has already changed since I first looked at it.<br>They're still in the process of adding more "proof" that no "Intellectual Property" was stolen, as I type this.<br><br>(Edit) Or, to put it another way...they're still panicking.  :D<br><small>--<br>I had a life once.....now I have a Computer and a Modem.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283862</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:54:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283832</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ryan posted : Yea I will believe IOBit over malwarebytes  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283832</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:50:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283804</link>
<description><![CDATA[La Luna posted : FWIW, I get a big warning from WOT when I go to that link. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283804</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:44:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283638</link>
<description><![CDATA[jabarnut posted : <div class="borderless siteshot"><small><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/0/115400.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/0/115400-big.gif" width=280 height=202></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.iobit.com" >www.iobit.com</A><br>Snapped 2009-11-03 10:31:59 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle style="vertical-align:middle;" TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br></small></div><br><br>Interesting "Declaration from IObit":<br>They "need your support and attention"  :D<br><br>Some of the followup comments are pretty good too...(Until they get deleted).<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://blog.iobit.com/archives/95.html" >blog.iobit.com/archives/95.html</A><br><small>--<br>I had a life once.....now I have a Computer and a Modem.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283638</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:17:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283624</link>
<description><![CDATA[rcdailey posted : That looks like the reverse, that IOBit is offering (as a vendor of sorts) version 8 of AVG.  Since AVG is up to version 9, that doesn't look all that current.<br><small>--<br>In reality, there is no such thing as a clean human being.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283624</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:13:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: IOBit Steals Malwarebytes Intellectual Property</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283092</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : is iobit taken by AVG?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.iobit.com/avg-com.html" >www.iobit.com/avg-com.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-IOBit-Steals-Malwarebytes-Intellectual-Property-23283092</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:36:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

