<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Clear in Chicago&#x27; in forum &#x27;Clearwire&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Clear-in-Chicago-23280391</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:36:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:36:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24728990</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : I think some upgrades happened by my home. My connection has been fabulous for the past 3 days.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/932930931.png"><br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.pingtest.net/result/23092063.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24728990</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:56:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24704880</link>
<description><![CDATA[bigdaddy posted : The Chicago market doesn't have enough Wireless Backhaul capacity.  As well as land line copper and or fiber in place, that's why all of your speed's are so terribly bad.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24704880</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 09:44:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24698745</link>
<description><![CDATA[dellis posted : I just put in my own ticket yesterday. Thought they might have fixed my issue but it lasted for about 5 minutes. The proof that they are deliberately capping the home users came to me about two days ago. Friday night I took my home modem to my job where I DJ. I did this once before and got great speeds even with two bars. This last time however, I was getting the exact same max speeds as I was when I was at home, and my job is about 25 miles away from my house! My mother is also on my account, but lives about 15 miles from me. I have the USB modem for her and she also complained of slow speeds. I keep a bandwidth monitor running always, and told the tech that it looked like I was being hard limited. He kinda tried to brush that off. Whatever they are doing, they better undo it, or they are going to have a mass exodus on their hands.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24698745</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 23:27:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24696417</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : From their own website, customers in Chicago Area are complaining about the terrible internet speeds even though they have 4 or 5 bars and had excellent speeds a couple of weeks ago.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.clear.com/clearcom/topics/anyone_else_in_chicago_been_getting_extremely_slow_speeds_at_home_for_the_past_2_3_weeks" >forums.clear.com/clearcom/topics&middot;&middot;&middot;_3_weeks</A><br><br>The Youtube video near the end matches the problem I've had for over a week now. Tech support says they will look into it but told me no one else had reported any problems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24696417</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 11:58:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24691534</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : As far as I know, there's no cap. I've blown way past 100GB myself. I would say that you're okay.<br><br>No way does this mean Clear won't change their rules down the road. A cap wouldn't surprise me, but I can't imagine it being under 100GB. They are trying to compete with wireline connections. That would kill their business strategy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24691534</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:18:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24681534</link>
<description><![CDATA[Aozora posted : How much downloading can I do on Clear's network? Is 50-100GB a month acceptable or not? I need more than the crap that 3G offers and not quite another ISP. Was wondering if this would fit my needs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24681534</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:27:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24675685</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1707820" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1707820');">mattharley</a>:</small><br><br> If you compare Clear's 4G+ to any other cellular broadband. Clear wins hands down.<br> </div>This I will agree with when comparing with other mobile providers when using 4G+ service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24675685</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:16:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24673628</link>
<description><![CDATA[mattharley posted : In general the 4G+ is the best way to go. The price dropped again and you should always lease your equipment.<br><br>There were growing pains and some area's arn't completly built out on 4G,yet. I have seen first hand huge improvments in coverage in just the last 6 months. <br><br>I think people need to be reminded that this is a mobile internet solution. I deal with cable service all day long and it's unfair to compare clear to any land line service provider.<br><br> If you compare Clear's 4G+ to any other cellular broadband. Clear wins hands down.<br><br>In 2009 Sprint was voted #1 for best network. Remember Clear is running on the Spints 3G side for it's nationwide coverage when not in 4G area's. I'm very happy for this new network and can see the prices start to increase soon.<br><br>If anyone needs testing in Chicagoland or wants to try out Clear, just contact me. &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gsmchicago.com" >www.gsmchicago.com</A>  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24673628</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:35:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24626171</link>
<description><![CDATA[WX MAN posted : I was told that the Evanston and Rogers Park towers were in the process of being upgraded with additional back-haul etc. According to their website the basic home plan is capped at 1.5 and the "get one" home plan is capped at 6.0. Only the more expensive "get two" plan is listed as not capped. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24626171</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:02:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24625457</link>
<description><![CDATA[TakeIT2 posted : I am on the border of Chicago and Evanston with usually 4/5 bars. the bandwidth speed tests for me really don't say much. We are on the cheep plan here at home, so obviously no roaming issues, still the fluctuation in the signal is noticeable.<br><br>I have had clear for 3 months after 10 yrs with RCN. It was a money choice to go with Clear for half the price. (and like 1/20 the bandwidth - yes, I mis that fat pipe) Aside from the overnight maintenance(?) downtimes that last about 10mins maybe, this service goes up and down in strength hourly, and I am near a tower. <br><br>The thing I watch is not the speed test, it is the status page on the modem/gateway/router settings. If you look at that page for provisioning settings - most of the time it will say zero (0) as though it has no idea the status of your provisioned rate. It is my suspicion they shape the service this way. Borrow from here or there to.. what do you do with spare capacity? Or has there been an over selling... Eh. My point is more that if you seem to get a slow speed it has as much to do with how you are provisioned. When there is no lock on this value all else will fluctuate. They can be overselling the capacity, shape the experience and no one is getting what they pay for because while slower than promised - you are still receiving service. Without fixed provisioning rates you you just have to accept their numbers as accurate. (Do we now?)<br><br>Of the 10 yrs with RCN I owned my own modem for the last 4yrs. In that time I had to make them re-provision my modem 3 times(I called and complained). The first time I called the tech had no idea what I could be talking about, and I had to push for a supervisor who could actually see the provisioning setting. (In the case of CLEAR that is a level 2 tech, not the first folks that answer the phone, they are just trouble shooters.) I was checking in on a configuration setting today and pointed out the provisioning to the the tech. In the process of them doing some signal checking with my modem, there was a provisioning rate, but it has since vanished from the status page, just like the 5th bar signal light on my modem.<br><br>I could be wrong about the association, but then why put the provision rate on a status page? Is It only an estimated value  ? you get when you convert the signal wavelengths/rates, you get a number that is kinda like what they call bandwidth capacity, but it is just to technical for us to understand? (raspberries.) Or is it the foundation in the equation of delivering what they promised us? <br><br>I have very mixed feelings about this service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24625457</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:24:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24624819</link>
<description><![CDATA[klawdek posted : Also online speed tests are useless.  It is common knowledge (or at least it was 12 years ago) that all ISPs maintain a list of speed test websites.  When you initiate a speed test your ISP un-throttles your traffic and gives it top priority so you get much better results.  The only way to measure download speeds is to watch the speed of a real download from a site you know is not slow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24624819</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 23:02:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24619845</link>
<description><![CDATA[klawdek posted : I have noticed that clear is throttling speeds down to 1-20 KBs at night.  It starts between 8 - 10pm and stops between 3-6am.  The past several night it has started at almost precisely 10 pm.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24619845</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:43:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24619783</link>
<description><![CDATA[LineNoise posted : Goto cachefly and download the 100MB test file and report your top speed.  What's your signal strength as well?<br><br>For the record:  I like fucking.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24619783</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:25:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24608730</link>
<description><![CDATA[ihatefucking posted : stay away from clearwire in chicago,  this is out in the west burbs,  been over 24 hours since i was about 0.3<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/900961844.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24608730</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:42:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24576655</link>
<description><![CDATA[rmarynowski posted : I'm getting the exact same numbers.  I'm in Oak Forest right now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24576655</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:42:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24572789</link>
<description><![CDATA[CLEAR_PM posted : Download a fairly large binary file and base speeds results off that and let us know.<br><br>You're ping seems to good for the speeds the test shows.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24572789</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:37:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24561158</link>
<description><![CDATA[LineNoise posted : fuck yea, best i've seen.<br><br>and FYI, speedtests haven't been working with clear very well.  try downloading an actual file from somewhere and gauging your speed that way.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24561158</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:39:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24560983</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dcdude posted : nice ping.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24560983</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:54:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24560189</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : 2000 West 1800 North, Chicago, IL<br><br>This is without a doubt the slowest service I have had since the mid 90's. If I call to put in a ticket, nothing will happen. Thay will ahve me check my computer, check my wireless router, check my cat's anal tempurature, check to see if my refridgerator is running.. Bla, bla, bla... Then in a couple days, or maybe a week or two (like the last time), the service will go back to around 1.3MB/s<br><br>LAME!! I'm really starting to hate Clear.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/888740868.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24560189</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:13:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24551166</link>
<description><![CDATA[CLEAR_PM posted : Hello,<br><br>If anyone has any questions or concerns about how there service would be in there area, feel free to send me a PM - I'll be happy to answer what questions I can.<br><br>I mainly work out of western suburbs, but can assist with Chicago land market questions. <br><br>Thanks,<br>CLEAR_PM]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24551166</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:47:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24549345</link>
<description><![CDATA[gripshift posted : I tried the 6/1 service on the 10th floor of an 18-floor downtown Chicago Loop office building. Got between 1 and 2.5 mb down. It takes forever to cancel - you are put on indefinite hold, and passed off between several reps - quite annoying. IMO, this company sucks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24549345</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:35:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24374972</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : There's no real way of telling without actually testing it in your unit. High rise units make it very complex to make an accurate assumption of connection quality without an actual test. My friend's unit is on the 14th floor of a building. Outside on the ground he gets amazing service. Up in his unit, nearly no service at all.<br><br>From my experience, a test from a mobile modem reflects the quality of a home modem. I tried both in my unit. My speedtests and pingtests are pretty much identical.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24374972</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:48:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24374578</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Does anyone have any results in using the home internet in the Bryn Mawr/Sheridan area of Edgewater? I'm going to be using it on the eighth floor of a lake facing high rise. I'm not really concerned with mobile considering that you can't swing a dead cat without hitting wifi in my area.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24374578</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:51:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24351622</link>
<description><![CDATA[LineNoise posted : Ozzie:<br><br>I had many issues signing up.  They were twisting my arm to sign a contract and I fought it tooth and nail against it.  If you signed up for the $50 for life than that's what you got.  I don't think that promo is around anymore, it was a damn good promo.<br><br>The $50 "For Life" was indeed that, unless you made a change.  I think Clearwire hired all the dead-beats Sprint got rid of for customer service, but it's terrible.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24351622</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:54:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24351385</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : I had my first outage last night in Lincoln Park. Both of my modems were searching for a signal. Looks like the tower by me took a dive. It came back online this morning.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24351385</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 11:10:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24349792</link>
<description><![CDATA[WX MAN posted : My understanding  is that the $50 for life guarantee is valid  as long as you make no change of service or defaults to the terms of service and acceptable use policies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24349792</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 23:06:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24349700</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : Never heard of it. I heard of the $50 for the 2 year contract length though. If you didn't have to pay for equipment, you're on contract. <br><br>What the sales rep might have meant by the 'no early termination fee' is that if you cancel it within two weeks of your start date, there is no ETF. If you cancel afterwards, then you pay the ETF fee.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24349700</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:36:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24348638</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ozzie8888 posted : I signed with Clear in January for the "$50 for life" plan with no term contract.<br>I just noticed in my account that I have a 2-year contract. I called Clear and they said that my "$50 for life" is really is "$50 for life of the contract"!! I never agreed for a 2-year contract and I was told by the guy at the store that I don't have to pay any penalty for early termination...<br>Has anybody experienced anything similar??<br>What is your understanding of the "$50 for life" plan?<br>Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24348638</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 16:20:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24345276</link>
<description><![CDATA[KUBATIC posted : That's a pretty cool graph tho...<br>I too have some speed and location data to share with you guys!<br><br>Visit our Blog page at: &raquo;<A HREF="http://futureisclear.wordpress.com/" >futureisclear.wordpress.com/</A> than click S&L link (shortcut here &raquo;<A HREF="http://futureisclear.wordpress.com/speed-coverage-location-scl/" >futureisclear.wordpress.com/spee&middot;&middot;&middot;ion-scl/</A> ) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24345276</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 16:03:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24336596</link>
<description><![CDATA[dellis posted : Average bandwidth over 5 mins time.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/24336596?c=1551714&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4MDM5MS54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="141435 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=542 SRC="/r0/download/1551714.thumb600~8531fc65a828f3afa4f6b3fcd1715f5e/bandwidth.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24336596</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:16:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24336407</link>
<description><![CDATA[dellis posted : Best speeds ever so far. Been watching my bandwidth meter and I've hit 10mbit/s. Downloads are averaging around 8mbit/s.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/835765295.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24336407</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:33:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24318329</link>
<description><![CDATA[aight posted : I haven't been in Webster place in almost 8 yrs. <br><br>btw, does anyone know if Clear has any plans on upgrading their equipment in Chicago land? I average anywhere from 1.2 Mbps - 5 Mbps ... I guess my speed depends on whether my neighbors are dl pornos on their clear service or not. Clear has already upgraded my dongle & modem for free and the speed got a little better.<br><br>Just once, I would like to average see 20 - 30 Mbps on this service.<br><small>--<br>You can say any foolish thing to a dog, and the dog will give you a look that says, 'My God, you're right! I never would've thought of that!'</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24318329</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:37:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24301926</link>
<description><![CDATA[dwc13 posted : Quick test while I wait for my car to be washed and detailed by the great staff at Simon's Car Wash & Detailing (1439 Shakespeare, near Clybourn) in Lincoln Park -- very highly recommended.<br><br>CINR 15, Modem facing West:<br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/828130846.png"><br><br>A few minutes later, CINR 12, Modem facing West:<br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/828136488.png"><br><br>Good news is the nearby Lowe's Theater (Webster Place) is towering in the back (north) and the speeds are still pretty respectable.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24301926</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 15:33:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24267866</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : 22nd floor.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24267866</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:28:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24267095</link>
<description><![CDATA[djhaloeight posted : <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/820541758.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24267095</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 07:51:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24266841</link>
<description><![CDATA[dellis posted : Not bad! Great ping! How high up are you?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24266841</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 04:12:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24264537</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : Same Location. I beat it again!  :D<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/819938779.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24264537</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:29:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24258293</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : Best speedtest I've had yet. In a building in downtown Chicago.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/818524288.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24258293</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:15:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24253221</link>
<description><![CDATA[LineNoise posted : dellis:   I don't know if I said it in here before or not, but that's the experience I have received as well.  Even though I was getting ~2megs (on speedtest.net), I would download at 600 KB/s.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24253221</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 10:47:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24252086</link>
<description><![CDATA[dellis posted : I'm starting to think that there are some crazy routing issues and traffic shaping factors that don't give a true Speedtest reading with Clear. To prove my point, with a bandwidth meter running on my desktop I did a Speedtest with horrible results. I then loaded up a website that has lots of graphics, and while loading I topped out around 3 mb/s. (I wasn't even getting 1 mb/s on Speedtest) It's almost like each request only gets a certain amount of bandwidth. Add up all the requests and you are cookin, but if you are downloading a single file and being throttled, forget it. Anyone with me here?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24252086</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:22:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24248709</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Four bars, in North Mayfair, two thirds of a mile from the tower.  Not even fifty percent of the low end of their claimed speed. This is ridiculously bad.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/815940467.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24248709</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 23:09:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24245994</link>
<description><![CDATA[djhaloeight posted : oh and with the dock i get a bubble of signal at work, in a small steel box, inside a much larger plant.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24245994</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 05:32:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24245990</link>
<description><![CDATA[djhaloeight posted : &raquo;<A HREF="http://3gstore.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=349&products_id=2010" >3gstore.com/index.php?main_page=&middot;&middot;&middot;_id=2010</A><br><br>quick link to the dock on 3gstore.com, you can also find it on clear's webstore.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24245990</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 05:30:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24231009</link>
<description><![CDATA[Clever_Proxy posted : Do you have a link to the dock? I'm doing a little shopping for updated Clear equipment myself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24231009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 13:25:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24227745</link>
<description><![CDATA[djhaloeight posted : Ordered the Clear mobile package with their new usb stick from ubee about a week ago, have had the service for a few days and have had time to form an opinion now.  It's pretty good for what it is...With just the usb receiver I was getting only 1 bubble in my house (brick and siding).  That was allowing me to get about 1mbps down...<br>OK for basic browsing and whatnot but not enough for Netflix streaming etc.  I really only bought the service for use at work, browsing the net on my laptop, since I have AT&T dsl at home.  However, when I tried it at work, I got NO signal.  I work in a mill, and sit in a control pulpit all day so I was sorta thinking that I wouldnt get any signal there.  Its a dead spot for most cell phones as well.  I was able to get signal if I held the laptop up to the window of the pulpit towards the exterior door of the plant, but thats not practical.  I ordered and received the usb performance dock they sell that works with the usb receiver.  WOW what a difference.  At home now where I was only getting 1 bubble of signal I now get at least 6.  And if I point it near a window I get FULL signal.  Netflix streams perfectly, etc.  I did a speedtest and its actually faster than my AT&T DSL...<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/811526114.png"><br><br>I'm hopeful that with the dock I can get a useable signal at work now.  Sorry for the longwinded post..:D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24227745</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:08:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24192697</link>
<description><![CDATA[dwc13 posted : Another O'Hare reading, this time from Gate C21:<br><br>CINR 34<br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/803951464.png"><br><br>CINR 33:<br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/803953425.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24192697</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:35:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24192670</link>
<description><![CDATA[dwc13 posted : Yeah, it looks like WiFi hijacked the PC.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24192670</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:31:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24181521</link>
<description><![CDATA[Skipdawg posted : Yea are you using the Mobile modems WiFi instead of WiMax?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24181521</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 10:25:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24180255</link>
<description><![CDATA[p110011 posted : You're on someone else's router? SBC?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24180255</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 21:51:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clear in Chicago</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24179147</link>
<description><![CDATA[dwc13 posted : Same location again (as previous post):<br><br>CINR 15<br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/800751363.png"><br><br>Three consecutive readings spanning @20 minutes with essentially identicial data.  Think something's up?  <br><br>15 minutes later, CINR 19:<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/800763842.png"><br><br>One final reading 10 minutes after the previous one, CINR 19: <br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/800771560.png"><br><br>Something's going on....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Clear-in-Chicago-24179147</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:02:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

