1 edit | reply to swhx7
Re: Doesn't address the fundamental problem said by swhx7:1. No ISP should be allowed to discriminate by protocol. Sorry, guy, but our customers want us to discriminate by protocol. For example, they want VoIP packets to be prioritized. And we are going to do it for them because it improves their experience. If you don't like it, don't subscribe to our service.
said by swhx7:2. The monthly bill is indeed full payment for upstream traffic. No; it's full payment for what my customer and I agree that the customer is buying. Which, in this case, is at a certain maximum bit rate with a limited duty cycle. You have no right to interfere with my relationship with my customers, who find the service to be very satisfying and economical. So, butt out. |
| So what if your back-end provider was a fan of P2P, and gave it highest priority?
I'm willing to bet that you get away with what you get away with because you're the only available provider to your customers? |
