<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems&#x27; in forum &#x27;TekSavvy&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283752</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:23:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:23:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23302638</link>
<description><![CDATA[hemzer posted : This was recorded at 10 PM .<br>Yes, I plan to switch the speedtouch to routed mode soon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23302638</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:43:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23293252</link>
<description><![CDATA[paulwye posted : I assume that each PC establishes its own PPPoE session (i.e. the Netgear is just a switch).  Out of curiosity, do you have a router handy?  Or, can you temporarily put the 516 in routed mode?  I'd be interested to know if the issue presents when the machines are connected to a router that initiates the PPPoE session for them.  I've got a program that gets really fussy when running on machines that have initiated their own sessions.  As someone pointed out below, could easily be an MTU issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23293252</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:51:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23292701</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : i'd check mtu settings on the windows vpn clients <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826159" >support.microsoft.com/kb/826159</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23292701</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:22:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23292623</link>
<description><![CDATA[Deadpool posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1474983" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1474983');">mr_hexen</a>:</small><br><br>are you using a standard VPN port? Bell's throttle restricts non-standard VPN ports because it thinks it bittorrent.<br><br>you have two options...<br><br>1. Use a standard VPN port.<br>2. Purchase the MLPPP option for $4/month more.<br><br>question... why do you have two DSL modems? do you have two DSL lines!?!<br> </div>It only thinks it's BT if you're using BT at the same time. Otherwise it's not an issue using non-standard ports of any kind.<br><small>--<br>Disclaimer: If I express an opinion, it is my own opinion, not that of Bell or its related companies.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23292623</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:08:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23292512</link>
<description><![CDATA[Martian3 posted : That ping is a bit high, but not out of the ordinary.<br><br>What times are you connecting through the VPN?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23292512</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:49:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23291931</link>
<description><![CDATA[hemzer posted : Any takers?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23291931</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:01:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23287889</link>
<description><![CDATA[hemzer posted : <br>Pinging xxxxxxxx with 32 bytes of data<br><br>Reply from xxxxxxxxxxx: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=112<br>Reply from xxxxxxxxxxx: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=112<br>Reply from xxxxxxxxxxx: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=112<br>Reply from xxxxxxxxxxx: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=112<br><br>Ping statistics for xxxxxxxxxxx:<br>    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),<br>Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:<br>    Minimum = 62ms, Maximum =  72ms, Average =  64ms<br><br>Tracing route to xxxxxxxxxxx<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  206-248-162-65.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.162.65]<br><br>  2    12 ms    13 ms    12 ms  lo-100.lns02.tor.packetflow.ca [206.248.154.122]<br><br>  3     *       12 ms    13 ms  2110.ae0.bdr02.tor.packetflow.ca [69.196.136.34]<br><br>  4    17 ms    12 ms    13 ms  tge6-1.fr3.yyz.llnw.net [208.111.182.137]<br>  5    13 ms    12 ms    12 ms  xe-1-1-0-0.tor11.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.69.69]<br>  6    25 ms    25 ms    25 ms  xe-2-0-0.nyc30.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.187.70]<br>  7    34 ms    35 ms    34 ms  GigabitEthernet2-0-3.GW18.NYC4.ALTER.NET [157.130.1.149]<br>  8    34 ms    34 ms    34 ms  0.ge-3-0-0.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.22.230]<br>  9    61 ms    65 ms    61 ms  0.so-4-1-0.XL4.DFW7.ALTER.NET [152.63.103.58]<br> 10    61 ms    60 ms    61 ms  POS7-0.GW6.DFW7.ALTER.NET [152.63.102.73]<br> 11    61 ms    61 ms    65 ms  mci27955-gw.customer.alter.net [63.114.56.150]<br> 12    61 ms    61 ms    62 ms  xxxxxxxxxxx<br><br>Trace complete.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23287889</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:16:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23284537</link>
<description><![CDATA[discoblues posted : Are you or anyone else on your home network using Bittorrent while VPN'ing to work ?  I've found vpn is slow if you connect while your link is being used for a bittorrent transfer - due to Bell's lovely DPI<br><br>make sure you or nobody else on your link has any active BT sessions, or have a look around in these forums on ways to bypass Bell's deep packet inspection.   ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23284537</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:01:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23284170</link>
<description><![CDATA[hemzer posted : Not two DSL modems.<br>I just showed it that way because I connect two PCs<br><br>I use<br>speedtouch512->Netgear->PC1 (win2K) & PC2 (winXP)<br><br>about the ports I  will have to check tonight.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23284170</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:50:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23284080</link>
<description><![CDATA[mr_hexen posted : are you using a standard VPN port? Bell's throttle restricts non-standard VPN ports because it thinks it bittorrent.<br><br>you have two options...<br><br>1. Use a standard VPN port.<br>2. Purchase the MLPPP option for $4/month more.<br><br>question... why do you have two DSL modems? do you have two DSL lines!?!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23284080</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:33:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283890</link>
<description><![CDATA[hemzer posted : Will do that as soon as I get home tonight.<br><br>Thanks Steve.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283890</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:58:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283840</link>
<description><![CDATA[TSI Steve posted : Can you ping and traceroute to the end point while not connected to the vpn?<br><br>Steve<br><br>edit: And can you paste the results here or in direct support?<br>If pasting results here please remove the hostname & IP of the VPN end point.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283840</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:51:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rogers-&#x3E;Teksavvy-&#x3E;VPN problems</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283752</link>
<description><![CDATA[hemzer posted : Hi Folks,<br><br>I switched from Rogers (512K/25GB) to Teksavvy(5M/200GB) about a few weeks ago.<br><br>My VPN connection from (Ajax, ON) to my office located in Toronto has slowed to a crawl (with me waiting for screens to redraw). I never had this problem with Rogers. I know my office servers are all fine because my next cube mate does not complain(He is on Rogers)<br><br>I am happy with every thing else at Teksavvy (usenet, surfing etc) not sure why the VPN connection shows so much degradation.<br><br>To all the techies here,  Questions:<br><br>- Is there any way (tools) to test the speed of a VPN connection alone?<br><br>- Can you recommend any (tools, tips) on where I can start looking to trace the problem I am experiencing?<br><br>I use<br> speedtouch512->Netgear->PC1 (win2K)<br> speedtouch512->Netgear->PC2 (winXP)<br><br>both PCs are wired (no wireless).<br><br>BTW: The Teksavvy experience is so far refreshing....simply because no one has lied to me yet. What a business concept!! <br><br>Why dint Bell/Rogers think of this? They would have still had me as a customer?<br><br>Now on to my next task, since I am not much of a social butterfly, I plan to introduce my wife's circle of friends to a life beyond Bell/Rogers..... heh! heh! heh! ;-)<br><br>Thank You all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RogersTeksavvyVPN-problems-23283752</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:36:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

