<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;trace route&#x27; in forum &#x27;CenturyTel&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/trace-route-23287421</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:41:04 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:41:04 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23350208</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : I still say there's problems. Anyone else? My speed doesn't look bad right now, but the pings are not good. Later both will be bad.<br><br>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2    48 ms    47 ms    48 ms  72-160-164-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.164.1]<br>  3    49 ms    47 ms    48 ms  GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>  4    48 ms    51 ms    51 ms  64.91.36.30<br>  5    84 ms    82 ms    90 ms  at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>  6    77 ms    91 ms    88 ms  206.51.71.213<br>  7   107 ms    81 ms    78 ms  bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>  8    82 ms    76 ms    75 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>  9    95 ms    92 ms    94 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br> 10   101 ms   100 ms   100 ms  as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br> 11   102 ms   135 ms   102 ms  ae2-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.93]<br> 12   105 ms   115 ms   103 ms  te-7-1.fab2-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.139]<br><br> 13   103 ms   100 ms   101 ms  te-9-1.bas-c2.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.193.11]<br> 14   101 ms   102 ms   101 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/624644668.png"><br><br>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2    55 ms    48 ms    47 ms  72-160-164-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.164.1]<br>  3    48 ms    55 ms    53 ms  GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>  4    48 ms    55 ms    52 ms  64.91.36.30<br>  5     *       85 ms    90 ms  at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>  6    78 ms    86 ms    82 ms  206.51.71.213<br>  7    91 ms    77 ms    78 ms  bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>  8    78 ms    76 ms    81 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>  9   207 ms    94 ms   110 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br> 10   129 ms   105 ms    99 ms  as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br> 11   106 ms   103 ms   118 ms  ae1-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.85]<br> 12   101 ms   120 ms   108 ms  te-9-1.fab1-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.135]<br><br> 13   107 ms   103 ms   111 ms  UNKNOWN-209-191-78-169.yahoo.com [209.191.78.169<br>]<br> 14   107 ms   102 ms   101 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/624648594.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23350208</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:29:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23332765</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : Well, for my area it seems to be. Hit and miss on the pings. Anywhere from 88 to 105. My concern is why the second hop is so slow compared to others i've seen around here. <br>Here's a tracert at 5:38 est<br><br>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2    49 ms    58 ms    49 ms  72-160-128-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.128.1]<br>  3    54 ms    50 ms    47 ms  GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>  4    49 ms    51 ms    48 ms  64.91.36.30<br>  5    86 ms    93 ms    94 ms  at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>  6    93 ms    88 ms    83 ms  206.51.71.213<br>  7    89 ms    90 ms    80 ms  bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>  8    78 ms    75 ms    77 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>  9    94 ms   103 ms    98 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br> 10   102 ms   117 ms   100 ms  as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br> 11   101 ms   101 ms   114 ms  ae2-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.93]<br> 12   100 ms   106 ms   107 ms  te-7-1.fab1-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.131]<br><br> 13   101 ms   101 ms   108 ms  UNKNOWN-209-191-78-171.yahoo.com [209.191.78.171]<br> 14   126 ms   120 ms   129 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/620789671.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23332765</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:41:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23331082</link>
<description><![CDATA[dsldude08 posted : Is this still acting up?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23331082</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:37:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23322187</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : 3 minutes later....<br><br>Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]<br>(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.<br><br>C:\Documents and Settings\HP_Owner>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2     *       71 ms    82 ms  72-160-134-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.134.1]<br>  3    48 ms    51 ms    62 ms  GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>  4    77 ms    91 ms    93 ms  64.91.36.30<br>  5    83 ms    90 ms    86 ms  at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>  6   115 ms   129 ms   122 ms  206.51.71.213<br>  7    78 ms    83 ms    78 ms  bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>  8   127 ms    94 ms   102 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>  9   132 ms   133 ms   161 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br> 10   137 ms   151 ms   164 ms  as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br> 11   111 ms   126 ms   118 ms  ae1-p120.msr1.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.81]<br> 12   103 ms   109 ms   107 ms  te-9-1.fab1-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.135]<br><br> 13   111 ms   102 ms   110 ms  te-8-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.193.5]<br> 14   110 ms   106 ms   112 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/618708208.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23322187</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23322176</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : Again, anyone see anything wrong with this?<br><br>6:49 est   1.5/512 <br><br>C:\Documents and Settings\HP_Owner>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2    98 ms    98 ms    95 ms  72-160-134-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.134.1]<br>  3   104 ms    72 ms    69 ms  GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>  4    93 ms   113 ms   121 ms  64.91.36.30<br>  5   114 ms   122 ms   133 ms  at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>  6   109 ms   117 ms   126 ms  206.51.71.213<br>  7   114 ms    91 ms    87 ms  bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>  8   115 ms   117 ms   117 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>  9   155 ms   149 ms   159 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br> 10   130 ms   123 ms     *     as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br> 11   135 ms   116 ms   129 ms  ae2-p120.msr1.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.89]<br> 12   124 ms   121 ms   117 ms  te-8-2.fab1-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.149]<br><br> 13   104 ms   126 ms   117 ms  UNKNOWN-209-191-78-173.yahoo.com [209.191.78.173]<br> 14   109 ms   110 ms   117 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/618705780.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23322176</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:52:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23303528</link>
<description><![CDATA[dsldude08 posted : In my opinion, hop 2 IS a problem. But, Ohio was the first state to be converted from Embarq to CenturyTel (CenturyLink) systems. So it is likely that if your routing goes through there, which eventually hits La Crosse, it will be affected until they get all the routes setup the way they want them while connecting Embarq's Network to CenturyTel's. <br><br>Have you tried different DNS servers just as a test by chance? It may help temporarily.<br><br>I did a tracert from my connection to Hop #2 on yours...<br><br>tracert 72.160.164.1<br><br>Tracing route to 72-160-164-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.164.1]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1     3 ms     2 ms     1 ms  192.168.1.1<br>  2    22 ms    24 ms    22 ms  lcrsalcobr5.lcrswicoro1.centurytel.net [69.29.181.15]<br>  3    19 ms    20 ms    19 ms  ae-0-0-j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [207.119.244.129]<br>  4    54 ms    54 ms    55 ms  at-0-2-0-j2-rt.lr.centurytel.net [64.91.42.130]<br>  5    56 ms    55 ms    54 ms  72-160-164-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.164.1]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br>It's likely a traffic thing. They probably added all the Embarq customers to CenturyTel routers, and are in the process of re-configuring the Embarq routers...Embarq systems have not appeared on my network map yet, so it makes sense that the case is such.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23303528</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:50:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23297724</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : That's some of it, but any info on my earlier hops. Like hop 2<br>Is that a local problem or even a problem at all in your eyes.<br>From Brookston to Battle Ground, Indiana to Lorain, Ohio<br>at 4:45 p.m. est<br>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>2 53 ms 53 ms 52 ms 72-160-164-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.164.1]<br>3 53 ms 54 ms 53 ms GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>4 60 ms 53 ms 53 ms 64.91.36.30<br>5 89 ms 88 ms 92 ms at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>6 81 ms 83 ms 89 ms 206.51.71.213<br>7 84 ms 82 ms 87 ms bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>8 79 ms 81 ms 82 ms bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>9 96 ms 106 ms 98 ms exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br>10 109 ms 104 ms 104 ms as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br>11 106 ms 106 ms 105 ms ae2-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.93]<br>12 104 ms 106 ms 105 ms te-6-1.fab1-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.129]<br><br>13 112 ms 106 ms 105 ms UNKNOWN-209-191-78-171.yahoo.com [209.191.78.171]<br>14 106 ms 110 ms 105 ms f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23297724</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:48:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23296674</link>
<description><![CDATA[dsldude08 posted : You run through La Crosse, WI - please see this thread: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r23286821-Increased-latency">Increased latency</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23296674</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:39:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23292573</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : So, I see your early hops are very low. What causes our early hops to be so high? I could swear that it used to be lower. I'm about a 1500' from the remote. It's fiber fed back to the office. Plus people in town and the town over(we all feed back to the same office, fiber) are the same when I do a tracert from their computer. Our speeds offered here are 512 and 1.5 <br> CTL just added more bandwidth from town to town and back to Ohio, that helped on slow speeds but the ping times never got much better. I'm not complaining, just trying to figure it out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23292573</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:00:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23288382</link>
<description><![CDATA[tstolze posted : Tracing route to f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2     6 ms     6 ms     6 ms  75-121-4-2.dyn.centurytel.net [75.121.4.2]<br>  3     7 ms     6 ms     6 ms  GE-0-0-0-j1.rt.wnvl.centurytel.net [66.112.11.73<br>]<br>  4     7 ms    59 ms     7 ms  host.lightcore.net [66.211.51.177]<br>  5    14 ms    14 ms    14 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-02-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [<br>206.51.69.46]<br>  6    14 ms    14 ms    14 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-ae0.core.centurytel.net [206.<br>51.69.69]<br>  7    67 ms    67 ms    67 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br>  8    79 ms    93 ms    78 ms  as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br>  9    77 ms    77 ms    77 ms  ae2-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.93]<br> 10    77 ms    81 ms    80 ms  te-8-1.fab1-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.133]<br><br> 11    79 ms    79 ms    77 ms  UNKNOWN-209-191-78-173.yahoo.com [209.191.78.173<br>]<br> 12    80 ms    78 ms    79 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>(Added: Sorry I was late, we had a service outage tonight...)<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://ofallonweather.org/">Ofallon, Mo Weather</a><br><A HREF="http://stpetersweather.org/">St. Peters, Mo Weather</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23288382</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:10:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23287862</link>
<description><![CDATA[tstolze posted : Step 1 is your modem<br>Step 2 should be the link between your modem and the CO/RT.<br><br>I will post a trace route when I get home in about 2 hours.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://ofallonweather.org/">Ofallon, Mo Weather</a><br><A HREF="http://stpetersweather.org/">St. Peters, Mo Weather</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-trace-route-23287862</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:09:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>trace route</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/trace-route-23287421</link>
<description><![CDATA[INtech posted : Would someone tell me whats good or normal on a tracert. Like in the following example, I was told the second hop should be 10 or less, yet no one around here gets that low. Was also told the 2 hop was my nic card. I don't think so, I think it is on CTL's network at that point. Set me straight, help me learn something. Thanks for any constructive info.<br><br>Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]<br>(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.<br><br>C:\Documents and Settings\HP_Owner>tracert www.yahoo.com<br><br>Tracing route to www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br>over a maximum of 30 hops:<br><br>  1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms  dslrouter [192.168.1.1]<br>  2    48 ms    48 ms    50 ms  72-160-152-1.dyn.centurytel.net [72.160.152.1]<br>  3    48 ms    49 ms    50 ms  GE-0-0-0-J1-rt.lr.centurytel.net [209.142.152.4]<br><br>  4    51 ms    50 ms    48 ms  64.91.36.30<br>  5    84 ms    84 ms    85 ms  at-0-2-2.0.j1-rt.lax.centurytel.net [64.91.42.129]<br>  6    76 ms    76 ms    76 ms  206.51.71.213<br>  7    86 ms    77 ms    77 ms  bb-lcrswixc-jx9-02-ae0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.74]<br>  8    78 ms    76 ms    98 ms  bb-chcgilwu-jx9-01-xe-1-1-0.core.lightcore.net [206.51.69.50]<br>  9    94 ms    93 ms    92 ms  exchange-cust1.ch1.equinix.net [206.223.119.16]<br><br> 10   103 ms   101 ms   101 ms  as-2.pat1.da3.yahoo.com [216.115.96.41]<br> 11   106 ms   102 ms   111 ms  ae1-p130.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.85]<br> 12   103 ms   104 ms   102 ms  te-9-1.fab2-a-gdc.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.78.143]<br><br> 13   132 ms   105 ms   101 ms  UNKNOWN-209-191-78-169.yahoo.com [209.191.78.169]<br><br> 14   101 ms   104 ms   102 ms  f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]<br><br>Trace complete.<br><br>C:\Documents and Settings\HP_Owner>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/trace-route-23287421</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:34:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

