<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;[Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Networking&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288203</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:35:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:35:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23294609</link>
<description><![CDATA[exocet_cm posted : I found my extra Intel 10/100/1000 NIC and added it to this server giving me:<br>1x 10/100<br>2x 10/100/1000 <br><br>Using the Broadcom Advanced Control Suite (since one of the 1000 cards is a Broadcom), I was able to very easily team the two 1000 NICs together and set the 100 NIC as a failover if <i>both</i> 1000 NICs crashed.<br><br>The BACS suite easily managed both the Intel NICs in the server without issue and everything took less than 2 minutes to configure. <br><br>Main page: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.broadcom.com/support/ethernet_nic/netxtreme_server.php" >www.broadcom.com/support/etherne&middot;&middot;&middot;rver.php</A><br>32bit Software Download: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.broadcom.com/support/ethernet_nic/driver-sla.php?driver=NX2-Mgmt" >www.broadcom.com/support/etherne&middot;&middot;&middot;NX2-Mgmt</A><br><small>--<br>"I have measured out my life with coffee spoons..." - T.S Eliot<br> "I have often regretted my speech, never my silence." - Publilius Syrus<b><br> <b>Ma blog: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.johndball.com" >www.johndball.com</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23294609</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23292333</link>
<description><![CDATA[LinkTech posted : I think they both have to be from the same vendor in order for the software to work.  Indeed, teaming a NIC with 1gig card and 1 100meg card can't be good either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23292333</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:19:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23292135</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Teaming a NIC which is 1/10th of its cousin's bandwidth does not make sense.  If ur just doing this just for fun and exercise, go4rit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23292135</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:55:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23291590</link>
<description><![CDATA[elnino posted : IF you set them up in a port bond (or port team), you can plug them into a managed switch that has port-channel or other 802.3ad capabilities.  One the switch it'll show up as 1 interface to your server.  On your PowerEdge, it would depend on the OS on how it shows up]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23291590</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:04:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23290387</link>
<description><![CDATA[exocet_cm posted : I know Intel provides the software, but I have one Intel NIC 10/100 and a second NIC (non-Intel), 10/100/1000. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23290387</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:50:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23290148</link>
<description><![CDATA[LinkTech posted : What you are thinking of is teaming the NICS.  Usually the manufacturer suppplies a software to team .hem,]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23290148</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:09:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23289122</link>
<description><![CDATA[exocet_cm posted : Ok, thanks for the clarification.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23289122</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:22:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288853</link>
<description><![CDATA[Napsterbater posted : You gonna get a broadcast storm if you plug them both to the same switch.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288853</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:08:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288552</link>
<description><![CDATA[shdesigns posted : It means that you will have a packet "food fight" between the cards and switch whenever a broadcast packet occurs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288552</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:43:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Servers] Bridged NICs = load balance?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288203</link>
<description><![CDATA[exocet_cm posted : I have two NIC cards in my Poweredge 4600. One 10/100 and the other 10/100/1000. <br><br>I bridged the two cards just for the hell of it. The network bridge reports a connection speed of 217.0 Gbps and reports a DHCP assigned IP address from the DHCP server whereas each individual NIC does not have the IP information listed (support tab is grayed out). <br><br>Does this mean that with both NIC plugged into the same switch it is passing traffic over both cards? <br><br>How should I be reading this bridge status?<br><small>--<br>"I have measured out my life with coffee spoons..." - T.S Eliot<br> "I have often regretted my speech, never my silence." - Publilius Syrus<b><br> <b>Ma blog: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.johndball.com" >www.johndball.com</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Servers-Bridged-NICs-load-balance-23288203</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

