<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe&#x27; in forum &#x27;Automotive&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23288797</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:38:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23309241</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Actually, I just test drove the Altima today, both the Coupe and the Sedan. Coupe looks a lot better than the Sedan, yet Sedan is much more comfortable than the Coupe (according to my friend who sat at the back seat both times). Anyways, I found the Coupe pretty comfortable though. So I think I might go for the ALtima Coupe, although I will test drive one more time. By the way, the rear window is indeed pretty small, which makes it difficult for parking.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23309241</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:58:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23303867</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1679620" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1679620');">kevin198897</a>:</small><br><br>Is it Altima Coupe comfortable though? I read many reviews that complained about the road noise, suspension, brake system and visiblity. <br> </div>I found it fine, but then when I compare it to the Maxima I prefer the Maxima.  But I can't do that because it's a different car.<br><br>I found the Accord and Altima rides to be similar.  I found them both to be more than acceptable.  I was pleasantly surprised by the Nissan CVT when I test drove it (Altima and Maxima), but not all may agree with the whole CVT thing.<br><br>Drive both cars.<br><small>--<br>"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23303867</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:16:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23303362</link>
<description><![CDATA[matt5 posted : As we all said, you have to test drive these vehicles.  What one person may find comfortable you may not, test drive both, see what you like.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23303362</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:13:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23302961</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Is it Altima Coupe comfortable though? I read many reviews that complained about the road noise, suspension, brake system and visiblity. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23302961</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:47:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23301035</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1679620" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1679620');">kevin198897</a>:</small><br><br>Personally, I think both ALtima and Accord look good enough to me. What I concern more is driving comfort and the repair/maintainense in the future. But yeah, I will test drive the ALtima this weekend.<br> </div>Well, yeah both look good enough I was just giving you my opinion.  I would venture a guess that in the long run, you'll be darn near equal with repair/maintenence.  Test driving the Altima with the CVT would be your next step, so wait until you do that.<br><small>--<br>"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23301035</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:13:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23298361</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Personally, I think both ALtima and Accord look good enough to me. What I concern more is driving comfort and the repair/maintainense in the future. But yeah, I will test drive the ALtima this weekend.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23298361</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:14:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23298298</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Probably 10k miles per year.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23298298</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:00:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23298167</link>
<description><![CDATA[matt5 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1679620" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1679620');">kevin198897</a>:</small><br><br>really? the rear brake issue is just minor problem? Because it seems to be pretty serious.<br> </div>It is in no way "serious" from any safety standpoint.  The brakes stop the car until they are worn down, all brakes wear down.  It's minor in that it happens a little faster than average.  As I said, if it was my purchase, that would mean brakes every 3.5 years, again, how many miles per year do you plan to put on.  It would make a big difference is how much money you would need to spend on brakes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23298167</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:30:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297843</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey posted : I would test drive both vehicles, and make a decision.  I've been driving Nissans since the mid 1990s, and love them.  I haven't yet owned a 2.5 engine frm Nissan, but I have driven them from time to time.  Peppy little 4's, I will say that.  I personally love the CVT, and if you're not familiar with it, I would really encourage you to do that test drive.<br><br>My brother just bought a 2009 Accord Coupe.  He loves it.  I rode in it.   I found the ride a bit harsh but then again I was comparing it to a Maxima and not the Altima, which is something I shouldn't do.<br><br>Personally, I think the Honda Accord Coupe looks better than the Nissan Altima Coupe.<br><br>Can't speak about the Honda brake issue, but I'll let you know in about 9,000 miles as my brother has barely broken his in yet.<br><small>--<br>"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297843</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:16:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297594</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : really? the rear brake issue is just minor problem? Because it seems to be pretty serious.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297594</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:25:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297411</link>
<description><![CDATA[matt5 posted : Suggestion, test drive 'em, see what one you like.  You're talking about two new cars, both from reliable manufactures.  Both are too new to comment on any known defects, that rear brake "issue" is a moot point, their is no amount of time brakes should last.  Not to mention for me that would be brakes once every 3.5 years.  Not bad, how many miles will you put on this car, that's about all I can add.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297411</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:53:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297301</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : So let's come back to the subject?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23297301</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:34:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 Altima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-Altima-Coupe-23295797</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Olds posted : Yes, I am familiar with all that info.  Usually an engine with 10:1 or higher compression ratio would need the higher octane of premium while engines in the 9.5:1 to 9.9:1 range can run a mid-grade fuel and all engines below 9.4:1 can run on the lower octane regular fuel.  With the advent of knock sensors, the C/R can go up some and still use Regular, but there is a minimal performance loss as long as you don't go past 9.8:1 or thereabouts.<br><br>Nice Flash Animation about C/R and Octane.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.howeverythingworks.org/flash/Engine.swf" >www.howeverythingworks.org/flash/Engine.swf</A><br><br>[att=1][att=2]<br><br>Some more background:<br><br>Regular or Premium? - Feature<br>Is premium fuel worth the premium price? Can you hurt a high-octane car by running it on the cheaper stuff?<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.caranddriver.com/features/01q4/regular_or_premium_-feature" >www.caranddriver.com/features/01&middot;&middot;&middot;-feature</A><br><br>I'm surprised that you didn't post the Wiki's on Compression Ratio, Octane Rating and Octane since you did post the Wiki on Gasoline. ;)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_ratio" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_ratio</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating</A><br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Generally, octane ratings are higher in Europe than they are in North America and most other parts of the world. This is especially true when comparing the lowest available octane level in each country. In many parts of Europe, 95 RON (90-91 AKI) is the minimum available standard, with 97/98 RON being higher specification (being called Super Unleaded).<br><br>In Germany, big suppliers like Shell or Aral offer 100 RON gasoline (Shell V-Power, Aral Ultimate) at almost every gas station.<br><br>The United Kingdom also offers Shell V-Power, but in a 99 RON octane rating, and Tesco fuel stations also supply the Greenergy produced 99 RON "Tesco 99".<br><br>In Australia, "regular" unleaded fuel is 91 RON, "premium" unleaded with 95 RON is widely available, and 98 RON fuel is also reasonably common. Shell used to sell 100 RON petrol from a small number of service stations, most of which are located in capital cities (stopped in August 2008).<br><br>In Malaysia, the "regular" unleaded fuel is 95 RON, "premium" fuel is rated at 97 RON, and Shell's V-Power at 97 RON.<br><br>In the Netherlands Shell V-Power is a 97 RON (labelled as 95 due to the legalities of only using 95 or 98 labelling), whereas in neighbouring Germany Shell V-Power consists of the regular 100 RON fuel.<hr></blockquote><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-gt/">What&#146;s the point of owning a supercar if you can&#146;t scare yourself stupid from time to time?</a></small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295797?c=1486600&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="53833 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=343 SRC="/r0/download/1486600.thumb600~8cdac4ac383ea785d742b8dd15b53587/CR_1.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295797?c=1486601&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="48498 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=342 SRC="/r0/download/1486601.thumb600~a5cce3de60abe77c476459c2988b559b/CR_2.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-Altima-Coupe-23295797</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:06:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 Altima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-Altima-Coupe-23295001</link>
<description><![CDATA[TA63 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/372021" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=372021');">Doctor Olds</a>:</small><br><br>Deep link like this?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2008f.jsp?year=2010&make=Nissan&model=Altima&hiddenField=Findacar" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx200&middot;&middot;&middot;Findacar</A><br><br></div>Impressive. <br>Here is the page I wanted to link to:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008car1tablef.jsp?id=29844" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/2008car1&middot;&middot;&middot;id=29844</A><br><br>The vehicle does not use premium.<br><br>[att=4]<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/372021" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=372021');">Doctor Olds</a>:</small><br><br>That page for the 2010 Models shows that both the 2.5 and the 3.5 use <b>the word "Regular"</b>, but that can't be accurate, can it?<br><br> </div>Regular refers to regular gasoline:<br>[att=1]<br><br>More info on regular vs premium gasoline:<br>[att=2]<br><br>And Wikipedia also has further information:<br>[att=3]<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/372021" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=372021');">Doctor Olds</a>:</small><br><br>That page for the 2010 Models shows that both the 2.5 and the 3.5 use the word "Regular", <b>but that can't be accurate, can it?</b> </div>As for why the 2010 V6 specifies regular as a minimum requirement now, we can only presume that the specifications have changed. <br><br>[att=5]<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://iguida.com/2010-nissan-altima" >iguida.com/2010-nissan-altima</A><br><small>--<br>Striving for Parfection.</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295001?c=1486571&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="13028 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=226 HEIGHT=181 SRC="/r0/download/1486571~baad3b754fbecda9ed1d20e0a68ceb71/Fueltype.jpg"></A></TD><TD ALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nowrap width="1%">&nbsp;</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295001?c=1486572&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="48235 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=468 HEIGHT=814 SRC="/r0/download/1486572~fd49deb92c65609f08c26bba5067a7e8/Regular.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295001?c=1486578&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="814824 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=4658 SRC="/r0/download/1486578.thumb600~efa87309ae50e81f602a96eb9ad6a8f3/gaswiki1.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295001?c=1486579&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="76940 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=451 HEIGHT=1820 SRC="/r0/download/1486579~38ee29ea2acf5995f9cd1dc463673527/Altimafe.gif"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23295001?c=1486582&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI4ODc5Ny54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="26618 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=288 SRC="/r0/download/1486582.thumb600~29ed07e218e8ad0f62b1a6dc3f0ddd07/Spec-change.gif/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-Altima-Coupe-23295001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:22:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294823</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Olds posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/247350" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=247350');">TA63</a>:</small><br><br>And the following links show that the four uses regular:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://autos.aol.com/cars-Nissan-Altima-2009/available-trims" >autos.aol.com/cars-Nissan-Altima&middot;&middot;&middot;le-trims</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ewheels.ca/scripts.dll?action=ShowModel&sid=&make=15&target=" >www.ewheels.ca/scripts.dll?actio&middot;&middot;&middot;&target=</A><br><br>Notably:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm</A><br>Cannot deeplink --> (Nissan Altima Coupe 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular)<br> </div>Deep link like this?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2008f.jsp?year=2010&make=Nissan&model=Altima&hiddenField=Findacar" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx200&middot;&middot;&middot;Findacar</A><br><br>That page for the 2010 Models shows that both the 2.5 and the 3.5 use the word "Regular", but that can't be accurate, can it?<br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/72/116472.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/72/116472-big.gif" width=280 height=202></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2008f.jsp?year=2010&make=Nissan&model=Altima&hiddenField=Findacar" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx200&middot;&middot;&middot;Findacar</A><br>Snapped 2009-11-05 06:53:27 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle style="vertical-align:middle;" TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br></small></div><br><br>Yet this page shows Premium on the 2009 3.5 unlike the 2010 Model.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2008f.jsp?year=2009&make=Nissan&model=Altima&hiddenField=Findacar" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx200&middot;&middot;&middot;Findacar</A><br><br><div class="borderless siteshot"><small><A TITLE="Zoom" HREF="http://i.dslr.net/urls/75/116475.png"><IMG BORDER=0 SRC="http://i.dslr.net/urls/75/116475-big.gif" width=280 height=202></A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx2008f.jsp?year=2009&make=Nissan&model=Altima&hiddenField=Findacar" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/compx200&middot;&middot;&middot;Findacar</A><br>Snapped 2009-11-05 06:58:59 <A HREF="/faq/7513" TITLE="Snap-shot of URL"><IMG  align=absmiddle style="vertical-align:middle;" TITLE="" SRC="http://i.dslr.net/silk/information.png" border=0 width=16 height=16></A><br></small></div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-gt/">What&#146;s the point of owning a supercar if you can&#146;t scare yourself stupid from time to time?</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294823</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:00:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294798</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : thx for backing me up.<br>so do you have any suggestion on this dilemma?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294798</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:41:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294781</link>
<description><![CDATA[TA63 posted : And the following links show that the four uses regular:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://autos.aol.com/cars-Nissan-Altima-2009/available-trims" >autos.aol.com/cars-Nissan-Altima&middot;&middot;&middot;le-trims</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ewheels.ca/scripts.dll?action=ShowModel&sid=&make=15&target=" >www.ewheels.ca/scripts.dll?actio&middot;&middot;&middot;&target=</A><br><br>Notably:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm" >www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm</A><br>Cannot deeplink --> (Nissan Altima Coupe 4 cyl, 2.5 L, Automatic (variable gear ratios), Regular)<br><small>--<br>Striving for Parfection.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294781</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:29:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294765</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : That is Nissan Altima V6 3.5L that requires premium fuel. But I am looking into Nissan Altima 2.5 S 4cyl. Those are two different models.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294765</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:19:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294743</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Olds posted : In 2008 the Altima 2.5 required Premium fuel so I doubt they downgraded the enigine C/R to now use Regular.<br><br>CHART: More vehicles prefer premium gas<br>Updated 4/13/2008 11:07 PM<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2008-04-11-chart-premium-gas_N.htm" >www.usatoday.com/money/autos/200&middot;&middot;&middot;as_N.htm</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-gt/">What&#146;s the point of owning a supercar if you can&#146;t scare yourself stupid from time to time?</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294743</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:06:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294718</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Yes, exactly.<br>Sorry if I mislead in some way.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294718</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:49:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294717</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : I meant both of these two vehicles require regular gas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294717</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:48:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294680</link>
<description><![CDATA[TA63 posted : Questionable grammar aside, it seems clear to me that kevin was referring to the 2 vehicles in question. <br><small>--<br>Striving for Parfection.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294680</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:51:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294663</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Olds posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1679620" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1679620');">kevin198897</a>:</small><br><br>They all require regular gas.<br> </div>No, that is incorrect, some of the brand new vehicles with high output or high performance engines "require" premium fuel because their engines are higher compression ratios (that's where the power comes from) and it states so in the specific models Owners Manual. The 4Cly 2.5 Nissan doesn't require it, but the 6Cly 3.5 Nissan DOES require it.<br><br>More cars than ever require premium fuel<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more-cars-than-ever-require-premium-fuel/" >www.autoblog.com/2008/04/17/more&middot;&middot;&middot;um-fuel/</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-gt/">What&#146;s the point of owning a supercar if you can&#146;t scare yourself stupid from time to time?</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294663</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:29:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Honda? Whatever!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294264</link>
<description><![CDATA[Its a Secret posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1679620" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1679620');">kevin198897</a>:</small><br><br>Yea, based on the statistic on carcomplaints.com, the average miles of replacing the brake is 10k. One of the customer reviews regarding 2010 Accord on Edmunds.com is already complaining the brake issue when it was only 3 digits on the odometer, although the rest of the review is very positive comments.<br> </div> Is this not self-explanatory?<br><small>--<br>"In the future, that which is not mandatory will be illegal"<br>"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better" - Anonymous</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294264</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:12:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Honda? Whatever!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294092</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : what do u mean?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294092</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:28:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Honda? Whatever!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294066</link>
<description><![CDATA[Its a Secret posted : That's fine, BUT... way too much money for a return on every other feature. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294066</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:22:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Honda? Whatever!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294046</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Yea, based on the statistic on carcomplaints.com, the average miles of replacing the brake is 10k. One of the customer reviews regarding 2010 Accord on Edmunds.com is already complaining the brake issue when it was only 3 digits on the odometer, although the rest of the review is very positive comments.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Honda-Whatever-23294046</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:19:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294033</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : What I concern more is the repair and maintenance in the future though. But yeah, I will test drive both. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23294033</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Honda? Whatever!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Honda-Whatever-23293827</link>
<description><![CDATA[Its a Secret posted : OK then...I think your question is answered. $300 every 10,000? I thought Honda was better than that. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Honda-Whatever-23293827</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:31:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23293793</link>
<description><![CDATA[Homunculus posted : Best thing to do is to test drive both. Personally, I'm a Nissan guy, so I can't really offer you an unbiased opinion. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23293793</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:26:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23292058</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : They all require regular gas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23292058</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:24:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23290264</link>
<description><![CDATA[cowspotter posted : 2.5 altima does not require premium.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23290264</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:29:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23288879</link>
<description><![CDATA[Doctor Olds posted : Does the Altima require premium gas (due to the high compression ratio engine design) and does the Accord run on regular gas (due to a lower compression ratio engine)??<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-gt/">What&#146;s the point of owning a supercar if you can&#146;t scare yourself stupid from time to time?</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23288879</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:18:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>2010 Accord Coupe vs 2010 ALtima Coupe</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23288797</link>
<description><![CDATA[kevin198897 posted : Hi. I am currently in this dilemma b/t the 2010 Accord coupe LX-S 4 cyl and the 2010 Altima Coupe 2.5 S CVT 4 cyl.<br>I think both of these two vehicles cost approximately 22k - 23k out the door (of course not now, probably late Nov or Dec). I first leaned more to Accord since everyone has been talking about Honda's reliability and resale value, also Accord is well-known for delivering a comfortable, smooth ride. However, after I have done my lots of research, it appears to be true that the 08, 09 and even 10 Accord models have severe premature brake squeaking issue. Honda Cooperate knows about the problem, but they claim that there is no fix and customers are responsible for paying for the repair, meaning that we have to pay about $300 every 10k miles (based on carcomplaints.com) to change the brake. After I found out this, I started leaning more to Altima. I have looked through a lot of reviews, and it seems like the cons of Altima is that it is not as comfortable as Accord, low resale value, kid-size back seat and extremely sensitive brake. <br>I checked the true cost to own estimation on both cars on edmunds.com, the cost is pretty much the same. Here's the link to the Altima and Accord, respectively  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.edmunds.com/new/2009/nissan/altima/101047047/cto.html?setzip=90012&vdp=off" >www.edmunds.com/new/2009/nissan/&middot;&middot;&middot;&vdp=off</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.edmunds.com/new/2009/honda/accord/101047634/cto.html?setzip=90012&vdp=off" >www.edmunds.com/new/2009/honda/a&middot;&middot;&middot;&vdp=off</A><br><br>So please give me some suggestion on this dilemma. Any help and advice would be greatly appreciated. I plan to keep this car for 5 years, and that's why I want to make sure I make the right decision. <br>Thanks a lot.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/2010-Accord-Coupe-vs-2010-ALtima-Coupe-23288797</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:42:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

