<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;6mbps line does not use full downstream.&#x27; in forum &#x27;AT&#x26;T U-verse&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291202</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:06:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:06:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23334008</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/620943102.png"><br><br>This is what I am downloading from UVERSE 6mbit<br>wish I had faster with out paying more money<br><br>I am in Los Angeles]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23334008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:49:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23306713</link>
<description><![CDATA[n4bkn posted :  <blockquote><small>said by djrobx :</small><hr>Part of the problem is that modem speed rates are generally calculated in actual kilobits per second, not "KiBs" (powers of 2) common with memory calculations. Your "6mbps" line is probably provisioned at 6,000,000bps, not 6,291,456 (6 * 1024 * 1024)<br><br>6mbps = 6,000,000bps / 8 = 750000Bps<hr></blockquote><br>I really don't think you meant milli-bits per second, more likely 6 Mega-bits per seconds? Case matters--I back sickwillie on standards for Kelvin and kilo, also.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23306713</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:50:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294973</link>
<description><![CDATA[tcg posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1661767" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1661767');">Crysin</a>:</small><br><br>Sorry, i just thought it funny that you'd mock someone KB or kB, in all honesty there may be a difference but there isn't one if your purely refering to speeds at which data can transfer.<br> </div>I wasn't mocking anyone.  Unless mock now means the same thing as point out a common (de facto) error.  And, I did so purely for the reason later stated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294973</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:15:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294432</link>
<description><![CDATA[djrobx posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1626029" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1626029');">rpk1974</a>:</small><br><br>I got Uverse a few months ago and have loved it since. I have the 6mbps line. It has never really given me any major issues except the download speed never really seems go pass 700kB/s. Shouldn't I be getting speeds near 768kB/s?<br> </div>Part of the problem is that modem speed rates are generally calculated in actual kilobits per second, not "KiBs" (powers of 2) common with memory calculations.    Your "6mbps" line is probably provisioned at 6,000,000bps, not 6,291,456 (6 * 1024 * 1024) <br><br>6mbps = 6,000,000bps  / 8 = 750000Bps <br><br>Now, ethernet has some overhead to it.   For every 1500 bytes, at least 78 are <A HREF="http://sd.wareonearth.com/~phil/net/overhead/">lost to headers</a>.  Best case, 94.9285% throughput.   So we have:<br><br>750,000 * .949285 = 711,963Bps.    <br><br>So, your top speed is 711KB/sec.   700KB/sec is not too far from ideal.<br><br>Be thankful you're not on ADSL with the 15% ATM penalty.  That's why 6mbps ADSL users see about 630KB/sec.<br><small>--<br><b>AT&T U-Hearse</b><br>Your funeral. Delivered.<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294432</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:09:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294370</link>
<description><![CDATA[Crysin posted : Sorry, i just thought it funny that you'd mock someone KB or kB, in all honesty there may be a difference but there isn't one if your purely refering to speeds at which data can transfer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294370</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:44:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294134</link>
<description><![CDATA[tcg posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1661767" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1661767');">Crysin</a>:</small><br><br>So how many bits go into a Kelvin? I always though that referred only to scientific temperature. I don't see the point in complaining about a abbreviation like Kelvin when your talking about computers, the Kelvin measuring doesn't even exist.<br> </div>...never mind, this is too facetious to honor with a serious response... :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294134</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:39:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294005</link>
<description><![CDATA[Crysin posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/873795" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=873795');">tcg</a>:k is the abbreviation of kilo, K stands for Kelvin. Nitpicking, I know.</div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23294005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293969</link>
<description><![CDATA[MSeng posted : I'm sorry -- but I have NO idea where you got Kelvin from the post.<br><small>--<br>If things get any worse, I'll have to ask you to stop helping me.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293969</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:02:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293713</link>
<description><![CDATA[Crysin posted : So how many bits go into a Kelvin? I always though that referred only to scientific temperature. I don't see the point in complaining about a abbreviation like Kelvin when your talking about computers, the Kelvin measuring doesn't even exist.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293713</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:16:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293602</link>
<description><![CDATA[MSeng posted : To the OP -- a true 6Mb connection would, in fact, be a 768Kb/sec throughput; not 700Kbps that others are suggesting.<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>That said, unless you are sitting on top of the VRAD, the fact is you will always get less than the full connection speed. <br><small>--<br>If things get any worse, I'll have to ask you to stop helping me.</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/23293602?c=1486456&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMzI5MTIwMi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="57595 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=199 SRC="/r0/download/1486456.thumb600~fd4c8e59b8a7add298869bd9fef2417c/Capture.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293602</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:55:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293306</link>
<description><![CDATA[tcg posted : It's not that I read it in one place - in fact,  I cited two.  Back in '87 when I got a BS degree in EET,  kilo was a lowercase k and it hasn't changed. Capital k is not an abbreviation for kilo no matter how many times it's misused on the Internet.<br><br>The first link is not a grammar page, btw.<br><br>Odd how your last post keeps getting longer.  The first time I read it, it was a concession; now it's a challenge. <br><br>I didn't point it out because you misused it, because if I did that every time someone did, I wouldn't get anything else done.  I pointed it out because you misused it <b>and</b> emphatically stated that the misuse was the correct usage.<br><br>To the OP, I'm sorry for hijacking your thread - and am now giving it back. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23293306</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:01:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292736</link>
<description><![CDATA[gdm posted : That's fine but most sites and browsers report as KB.  Also just because you read it in one place doesn't mean its correct.  Also I stand by that's it's KB looking at a grammar page means nothing since alot of tech stuff isn't listed on those kinds of pages.<br><br>Search some of the FAQ's here and see how it's reported.  Speakeasy shows speeds in megs and kb.  Also AT&T servers shows both as well.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-second-vs-kilo-bits-per-second-kbps-vs-kbps/" >techallica.com/kilo-bytes-per-se&middot;&middot;&middot;vs-kbps/</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.lyberty.com/encyc/articles/kb_kilobytes.html" >www.lyberty.com/encyc/articles/k&middot;&middot;&middot;tes.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292736</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:27:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292688</link>
<description><![CDATA[tcg posted : Speedtest.net does it in Mbps.  Firefox downloads shows the file size incorrectly by abbreviating it KB.<br><br>However, if you read the first link I linked to, it shows the correct (and incorrect) abbreviation.  K == Kelvin, k == kilo.<br><br>So, I'm sorry, it's wrong.  I won't belabor the point and bore everyone here by arguing with you about it, but the abbreviation is kB. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292688</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:18:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292587</link>
<description><![CDATA[gdm posted : Actually it's KB/sec look any speedtest and when you download via a browser it's KB not kB.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292587</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292489</link>
<description><![CDATA[tcg posted : &raquo;<A HREF="http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/correct.htm" >lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/correct.htm</A> (bottom of the page)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000058.htm" >englishplus.com/grammar/00000058.htm</A> (metric abbreviations)<br><br>k is the abbreviation of kilo, K stands for Kelvin.  Nitpicking, I know. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292489</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:47:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292358</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : Can you elaborate on this?<br><br>What's the difference between KB and kB? The k=kilo, b=bit, B=byte.<br><br>So essentially KB is kB. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292358</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:24:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292151</link>
<description><![CDATA[tcg posted :   <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>For a 6meg line 700<b>KB</b>/sec is correct.<hr></blockquote><br><br>No, 6 Mb/s would be 700 <b>k</b>B/s.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292151</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:42:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292037</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : Awesome! All this time I assumed I was suppose to be getting 768kB/s. Thanks for the help!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292037</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:20:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292022</link>
<description><![CDATA[mmay149q posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/411904" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=411904');">gdm</a>:</small><br><br>You are hitting the numbers you should be and on downloads 700KB/sec is your max +/-<br> </div>And not only that, but the further the distance is you will see some drops in your maximum speed as you are hitting more hops along the way. In addition you are probably using about 98 - 99% of the total bandwidth we allocate for your Internet usage, (of course the 2% is for overhead) So you are getting the most/best you're going to get, not only that but your ping times look really good as well. I would say you have a good line!<br><br>Thanks, Matt<br><br>U-verse Tier II Technical Support.<br><small>--<br>I'm an AT&T Employee <b>dedicated</b> to phenomenal customer service! Don't believe me? Check out my kudos! &raquo;<A HREF="/profile/1626573">/profile/1626573</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22870110-How-to-Contact-Tier-2-agents">How to Contact Tier 2 agents</A> Hours 12PM - 9PM CST.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23292022</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:17:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291986</link>
<description><![CDATA[gdm posted : You overly complicating it.  You are hitting the numbers you should be and on downloads 700KB/sec is your max +/-]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291986</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:11:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291977</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : Well I'm using <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS322US322&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=6megabit+to+kilobyte">binary conversion</a> so I guess that's where the confusion stemmed from. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291977</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:09:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291969</link>
<description><![CDATA[gdm posted : No you won't get 768 and where are you getting that number from?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291969</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:07:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291959</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : Here are my results from speakeasy. I connected to a Dallas server. <br><br>Download Speed: 4979 kbps (622.4 KB/sec transfer rate)<br>Upload Speed: 947 kbps (118.4 KB/sec transfer rate)<br><br>I just want to know if I'm suppose to get speeds up to 768kB/s or if my max is 700kB.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291959</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291953</link>
<description><![CDATA[gdm posted : Yes that is correct as I stated 700 KB/sec is what you should get roughly on a 6 meg line.  For speedtests 5.8 is right on target as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291953</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:05:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291927</link>
<description><![CDATA[mmay149q posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1626029" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1626029');">rpk1974</a>:</small><br><br>Here are my new stats from speedtest. It appears I'm running close to 6/1mbps. <br><br>Also I stumbled upon <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/faq/14472">this</a> <br>From reading this, 6mbps=6000kbps=700kB/s. Is this correct?<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/612664140.png"><br> </div>Looking at this it shows me that your speeds are pretty good, have you tried speak easy? Or anything that might be a state away from you?<br><br>Thanks, Matt<br><br>U-verse Tier II Technical Support.<br><small>--<br>I'm an AT&T Employee <b>dedicated</b> to phenomenal customer service! Don't believe me? Check out my kudos! &raquo;<A HREF="/profile/1626573">/profile/1626573</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22870110-How-to-Contact-Tier-2-agents">How to Contact Tier 2 agents</A> Hours 12PM - 9PM CST.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291927</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:00:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291897</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : Here are my new stats from speedtest. It appears I'm running close to 6/1mbps. <br><br>Also I stumbled upon <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/faq/14472">this</a> <br>From reading this, 6mbps=6000kbps=700kB/s. Is this correct?<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/612664140.png">]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291897</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:54:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291859</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hookem99 posted : Matt is correct, that it could be a server issue. Austin is 20 miles away from me, while Dallas is 190. Here is my test on the Dallas server.<br><br>Also, Matt is the man! If it's an AT&T issue he WILL get it taken care of, as I speak from experience!<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/612660955.png"><br><small>--<br>Women think they are clever just because they can fake an orgasm for a relationship, whats the big deal a man can fake a whole relationship for an orgasm!!!!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291859</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:47:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291831</link>
<description><![CDATA[mmay149q posted : Hello, this is Matt with U-Verse Tier II Technical Support. I want to resolve your issue as quickly as possible. Please send your account information to uversecare@att.com I'd like to get your issue resolved immediately. From here it looks like everything appears normal, it could be the server and not the service, but if you want to send me the info I'd be more than happy to look over the physical plant and make sure it's not something on our end.<br><br>Thanks, Matt<br><br>U-verse Tier II Technical Support.<br><small>--<br>I'm an AT&T Employee <b>dedicated</b> to phenomenal customer service! Don't believe me? Check out my kudos! &raquo;<A HREF="/profile/1626573">/profile/1626573</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22870110-How-to-Contact-Tier-2-agents">How to Contact Tier 2 agents</A> Hours 12PM - 9PM CST.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291831</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:44:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291824</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hookem99 posted : Try www.speedtest.net this is what my 6/1 connection looks like.<br><br><IMG SRC="http://www.speedtest.net/result/612657393.png"><br><small>--<br>Women think they are clever just because they can fake an orgasm for a relationship, whats the big deal a man can fake a whole relationship for an orgasm!!!!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291824</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:43:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291730</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : I'm just converting using the <A HREF="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS322US322&q=1+megabit+to+kilobyte&aq=1&oq=1+megabit+to+kilo&aqi=g2">google calculator. </a><br><br>1 megabit= 128 kilobytes. Is this incorrect? <br><br>Edit: I just did a speed test. I don't believe these are true speeds since I was downloading some files via usenet @ 700kB/s. <br><br>Speed Test #81235401 by dslreports.com<br>Run: 2009-11-04 16:32:09 EST<br>Download: 4665 (Kbps)<br>Upload: 945 (Kbps)<br>In kilobytes per second: 569.5 down 115.4 up<br>Tested by server: 54 java<br>User: 1626029 @ dslreports.com<br>User's DNS: sbcglobal.net<br>Compared to the average of 889 tests from sbcglobal.net:<br>* download is 49% better, upload is 42% better]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291730</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:28:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291278</link>
<description><![CDATA[gdm posted : Your confusing your bits and bytes.  Where are you getting that figure from?<br><br>If you use a speed test you should get results like this<br><br>Download Speed: 17123 kbps (2140.4 KB/sec transfer rate)<br>Upload Speed: 1482 kbps (185.3 KB/sec transfer rate)<br><br>For a 6meg line 700<b>KB/sec</b> is correct.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291278</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:15:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>6mbps line does not use full downstream.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291202</link>
<description><![CDATA[rpk1974 posted : I got Uverse a few months ago and have loved it since. I have the 6mbps line. It has never really given me any major issues except the download speed never really seems go pass 700kB/s. Shouldn't I be getting speeds near 768kB/s?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/6mbps-line-does-not-use-full-downstream-23291202</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:03:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

