<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;RAM Timing Discussion&#x27; in forum &#x27;PC Hardware Discussion/Reviews&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RAM-Timing-Discussion-23295806</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:27:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:27:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23317946</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bandito posted : I read a comment the other day that the RAM specs mean very little and 800 or 1066 is fine unless you're overclocking....now, I'm confused. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23317946</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:18:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23309049</link>
<description><![CDATA[elios posted : CAS 9 <br>like 9-9-9-something <br><br>what i linked is CAS 8 <br>its great ram 1600 and CAS 8 for 110 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23309049</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:56:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23309028</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bandito posted : Cool and thanks. Would there be a minimum latency that I should get?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23309028</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:25:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308534</link>
<description><![CDATA[elios posted : 4GB of performance ram for just over a 100 is hard to beat<br>go faster and price goes up to much <br>go slower and price really doesnt drop much for good name brands i would trust <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=50001666%201052315794&name=4GB%20%282%20x%202GB%29" >www.newegg.com/Product/ProductLi&middot;&middot;&middot;202GB%29</A><br><br>what im getting for my next build<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145265" >www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a&middot;&middot;&middot;20145265</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308534</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:24:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308523</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kiwi posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1290198" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1290198');">elios</a>:</small><br><br>imo DDR3 1600 is the best right now <br> </div>Agree]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308523</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:21:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308504</link>
<description><![CDATA[elios posted : imo DDR3 1600 is the best right now ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308504</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:14:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308439</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bandito posted : On the topic of ram and timing.  The new P55 mobos have specs of 2600+/2200/1333/1066/800.<br><br>That's a LOT of different ram types the mobo can handle.  Which ram spec has the best price vs performance ratio?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308439</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:52:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308011</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kiwi posted : Real world has two sides, one is basic plug & play and the other is OC. This is another question many people ask, essentially if you follow the requirements for a given mobo/chipset timing won't really matter. It's only when you want to scathe the last nanometer of bandwidth from a DDR chip, that it does matter. <br><br>What is it you really want to know? How fast a given memory chip will work, or how hard you can push it? Timing is relative to to a chipset and BIOS, sometimes only a chipset based timing will work, given a mobo manufacturer won't make BIOS changes that will extend past normal and accepted results.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23308011</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:00:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23306554</link>
<description><![CDATA[b10010011 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/580037" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=580037');">Tursiops_G</a>:</small><br><br>I always leave the RAM timings in the BIOS set to "By SPD"...<br>The only parameter that I usually double-check/adjust for in the BIOS (if necessary), is the RAM's Voltage, just to make sure that it agrees with the particular RAM Manufacturer's Spec Sheets. ;)<br><br> -Tursiops_G.<br> </div>You might want to also check the manufacturer specifications on the timings too. Some manufacturers (like OCZ) will set the SPD of faster RAM to slower speeds than the RAM is spec'd at to make them more compatible with cheaper motherboards that can not handle the faster timings. <br><br>The CAS is mainly effected by this and often CAS-2 rated RAM will have an SPD of CAS-2.5 or even 3 and you have to manually set it to 2 to get the full performance out of it. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23306554</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:59:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23304260</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tursiops_G posted : I always leave the RAM timings in the BIOS set to "By SPD"...<br>The only parameter that I usually double-check/adjust for in the BIOS (if necessary), is the RAM's Voltage, just to make sure that it agrees with the particular RAM Manufacturer's Spec Sheets. ;)<br><br> -Tursiops_G.<br><small>--<br>If You're Unsure, "RTFM"... If You're SURE, "RTFM" Anyway. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23304260</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:48:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23304217</link>
<description><![CDATA[kingdome74 posted : LOL, I've always wondered if it hurt anything. I usually change my timings before I even  fire up a new build for the first time.<br><small>--<br>Hunting is a sport... except only one side knows it's playing - anon comedian<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23304217</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:39:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23304160</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tursiops_G posted : Lower Benchmarks. ;)<br><br>When running "Real-World" Apps, You wouldn't be able to notice the difference... :)<br><br> -Tursiops_G.<br><small>--<br>If You're Unsure, "RTFM"... If You're SURE, "RTFM" Anyway. ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RAM-Timing-Discussion-23304160</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:25:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>RAM Timing Discussion</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RAM-Timing-Discussion-23295806</link>
<description><![CDATA[kingdome74 posted : What is the downside of running RAM that's timing is 8-8-8-21 at 9-9-9-24 or something other than what it's supposed to be? This something I've always been curious about and I'd like to hear from people with real world experience.<br><small>--<br>Hunting is a sport... except only one side knows it's playing - anon comedian<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RAM-Timing-Discussion-23295806</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:07:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

