<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord&#x27; in forum &#x27;Networking&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23299933</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:48:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:48:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23302489</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbopalmer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/239636" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=239636');">tschmidt</a>:</small><br><br>And just to nit-pick shouldn't that be 132 nanoseconds to account for round trip time?</div>Only in a protocol with round trips, if you are streaming video or doing Voice over IP, you may have a lot of one way packets.<br><br>Either way, that will be downed out by the delay in the NICs, switches, and routers.<br><br>Really good switches have latency in the 10s of microseconds, the Cisco 6509 has 15 microsecond latency, best case, it would be easy to hide 132 nanoseconds in 15 microseconds.<br><small>--<br>I tried to remain child-like, all I achieved was childish.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23302489</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:16:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23301932</link>
<description><![CDATA[cdru posted : Bandwidth and latency for all intents and purposes is the same between those two cable lengths as already pointed out.  A longer cable or coiling up a cable increases the chance of signal interference, and that could reduce overall performance, but even then that generally isn't an issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23301932</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:53:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23301517</link>
<description><![CDATA[tschmidt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1555933" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1555933');">jimbopalmer</a>:</small><br><br>It is going to take an extra 66 nano seconds to go the extra 50 feet, but you will never know.<br> </div>Hard core gamers will argue about that.  :)<br><br>An just to nit-pick shouldn't that be 132 ns to account for round trip time?<br><br>/tom]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23301517</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:35:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23300115</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbopalmer posted : It is going to take an extra 66 nano seconds to go the extra 50 feet, but you will never know.<br><small>--<br>I tried to remain child-like, all I achieved was childish.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23300115</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:12:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23300109</link>
<description><![CDATA[shdesigns posted : Should not be. Ethernet is good up to 328'.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23300109</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:03:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is there a difference in performance when using longer cord</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23299933</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Is there a difference in performance when using a 100Ft Ethernet cord instead've a 50Ft?<br><br>Thanks. :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Is-there-a-difference-in-performance-when-using-longer-cord-23299933</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:45:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

