Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » OS and Software » No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer » One big group policy or multiple small group policies
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
264
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Cheap networked laser printer? »
« ADP Enterprise V3/4/5  
AuthorAll Replies


exocet_cm
In memory of dadkins
Premium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
clubs:

1 edit
 One big group policy or multiple small group policies

Is it better to have multiple small group policies or one group policy for any given OU?�


boognish
Premium
join:2001-09-26
Baton Rouge, LA
clubs:
I do lots of small ones and name them what function they perform.
--
don't get 2 close 2 my fantasy

lorennerol
Premium
join:2003-10-29
Seattle, WA

I wish there was a simple way to hide the settings that aren't default. I know RSOP sort of accomplishes this, but having to wade through thousands of settings in GP just to get to the one I'm using is a pain and is the primary reason that I put multiple settings in one GPO.


The WeaseL
Premium
join:2001-12-03
Minnesota
reply to exocet_cm
I normally opt for more smaller ones.


devnullgt
yep..I'm still alive
Premium
join:2000-11-06
King Of Prussia, PA
reply to exocet_cm
1 Default Workstation
1 Default Server

Those two have the very common settings such as allowing RDP, NTP source, WSUS source, password settings, etc

Then smaller ones for specific functions.


exocet_cm
In memory of dadkins
Premium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
clubs:
reply to exocet_cm
Re: One big group policy or multiple small group policies�

Thanks for the replies guys.


techjoe
Premium
join:2004-02-20
Schererville, IN

reply to exocet_cm
Re: One big group policy or multiple small group policies

There's really no perfect answer. It totally depends on your AD design and what you're trying to do.

Things that apply to the organization go at the top and I typically group them together in a few large policies. I have one for the "Defaults" persay that we enforce, then the password policy object, then a few smaller ones.

Quite often I start out with a new setting in a new GPO object. After it's production-ready I apply it to a single OU, then ramp it up. I'd rather keep the break scope to a single container than the whole domain..Keeps the VIPs from being early adoptors and everything too.

Once it's "tried and true" I'll combine it into an existing policy. If it's a temporary policy (say a machine startup script for a project, something like that) it will remain in its own object and be linked that way.

Deciding which policy to tack settings onto, or which to combine/split, has a lot to do with your needed scope. If you intend to exclude OUs, using loopback, only really need it on a single OU, having it separated has obvious advantages. But remember, now when you add a new OU (new facility, new department, whatever) you have to link those small policies by hand. I hate going back and splitting GPO's I combined or lumped settings in initially...But I hate having to verify numerous objects for a single "function" (IE8 defaults, for example). So there's a middle ground that really depends on the administrator and the AD design..

How often you change the policy plays a big role too.

The best thing I can say to the OP and everyone else, is check out »207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/200···erf.aspx .

Ok good, so it looks simple and straight forward.

Now look at an example of the official MS words on it.. »support.microsoft.com/default.as···&sd=tech

Long story short, if you're designing the policy with how often it has to be applied/changed/etc and all of that it's not an issue, especially on decent hardware/connections. Just keep your sanity in mind..
--
Baka wa shinanakya naoranai


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

reply to exocet_cm
As someone else has said, it depends on your setup.

I tend to make a default policy for the servers, workstations and users which contain policies that should be uniform across the board for that type of object. Then, as I create OUs, policies are created that are specific for those OUs.

Of course, now that I work for a large corporation, those policies come from corporate security, so I don't even get to touch them. Which is usually a good thing, but sometimes it causes problems.
--
Kilroy was here

adamtech78

join:2006-01-25
Chicago, IL
we are in a way screwed with the default policy. too much stuff is included in it.

so that's my tip.
I would do more smaller ones, but
-
Forums » Tech and Talk » OS and Software » No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! ComputerCheap networked laser printer? »
« ADP Enterprise V3/4/5  


Sunday, 29-Nov 14:25:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [76] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Samsung LCD TV No Picture but has Sound [Electronics]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Windows 7 and HIGH latency [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· stopthetvtax [Canadian Chat]