<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Access to Clear Modem?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Clearwire&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Access-to-Clear-Modem-23301859</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:10:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:10:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23628645</link>
<description><![CDATA[ygtai posted : I borrowed a Linksys WRT54G v8 and the result was totally the same.  Fast wired, slow wireless.  I pulled the wireless router further away from the modem to about 15 feet (which is the farthest I could get since I live in a small apartment) and it's still the same.  If MTU or other firmware settings were the problem, my wired connection should be slow too, and I tried nevertheless.  This is really beyond me.  <br><br>I'll try 5GHz WLAN if I could borrow a pair of device.  Don't know if it will help.  But before any solution I will have to stick with the all wired setup... :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23628645</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:57:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23602889</link>
<description><![CDATA[kram1984j posted : @ygtai:  yes, since they're both G and it shows 5 and 10, they're both at 2.4 ghz...realized that before but forgot... anyways... it has two separate radios supposed to only be able to do one at 2.4 and one at 5ghz but as I have it setup now its channel 5 and 10 so I don't know what's up with that.  my original plan was to setup N for the bridge @ 5ghz and G at 2.4 for my other devices... but it wouldn't let me and the N settings for it through dd-wrt were very very finicky (trying to set the channel/get the second one in client mode to lock onto the channel the first one was set to and with same width, etc)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23602889</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:16:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23602504</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Thanks,  that's interesting to know, seems here in atl most traffic hits that guy first and it appears to be in WA, though can't tell for sure, I was just curious if it was the same for another area and I guess it's not (nor should it be).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23602504</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:13:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23601989</link>
<description><![CDATA[ygtai posted : I think they are highly likely operating at 2.4GHz, or it wouldn't be channel 5 and 10, and it wouldn't be 11g only.<br><br>Yeah there are so many things hard to explain/find out...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23601989</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:23:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23601714</link>
<description><![CDATA[kram1984j posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1701221" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1701221');">ygtai</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1694339" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1694339');">kram1984j</a>:</small><br><br> </div>Hmmm.. so your connection is through 2 wireless devices wirelessly with good speed?  That means there is really no significant interference between WiMAX and WiFi.  What are your wireless routers?  I read a review somewhere online that the Clear Spot WiMAX to WiFi device cuts the throughput by half.  But not as bad as what I got (1/4) with Netgear WGR614v6.<br> </div>I have two Netgear WNDR3300's running dd-wrt firmware.  The one connected to the Clear modem by an ethernet cable (actual modem is located about 15 feet from router) is setup in AP mode with 802.1g on channels 5 and 10.  The second modem is connected through its LAN port to my main PC and is set in Client Bridge mode (it connects to channel 5).  I connect my other 802.1g devices to the channel 10 network which is only transmitted from the one near the Clear modem.  Goes through a brick wall and 2 other walls and 50' or so.  I get the full 10-12/1ish (sometimes 6 down but not just from the wireless link, the tower's just supplying less bandwidth to me sometimes) on both my PC and a netbook at that distance.  I have a PS3 in another room speedtests on there are wonky though if I go to speedtest.net in the browser it shows wildly varying results and reports 30MBPS sometimes (there's something strange going on with the speedtest.net test and the PS3 browser).  The WNDR3300 are dual-band modems but the dd-wrt firmware is kind of wonky to get it to use both of the wireless transmitters (one is supposed to be at 2.4ghz and one at 5ghz, but I "think" they're both at 2.4.... not an easy way for me to test or confirm that).  Interestingly, it was also much more finicky/difficult to get the connection stable/high-quality between my PC and the wifi router than from the netbook, but it's completely solid now after tons of settings tweaks.<br><br>Changing the MTU in "my" setup had a huge effect on both upload/download and general webpage-fetching times from my primary PC.  It would make sense that only the upload would be affected much... but maybe in my setup the router had been sending 1500 sized packets to the Clear modem and the clear modem was splitting them up (inefficiently and with severe degredation to overall operating limits of the processor in the router/modem).  I really don't have a good reason why it would degrade the connection so much, but it definitely was having a negative effect in my setup.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23601714</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:32:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23596952</link>
<description><![CDATA[ygtai posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by knighthawktf :</small><br><br>Do your traceroutes filter out though this guy?<br>75.94.255.161 <br> </div>I'm not very sure what do you mean?  I tried traceroute to the Google public DNS, and the address you mentioned was not among the hops.<br><br>My next hop to the modem was 71.20.64.2, which is in Houston.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23596952</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:36:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23596951</link>
<description><![CDATA[ygtai posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1694339" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1694339');">kram1984j</a>:</small><br><br>try changing the max MTU to 1400 not 1500 in your router.  My router was performing poorly with 1500 set both in much slower speed tests and more lag.  </div>MTU=1500 in the router should only affect upstream, and upstream traffic are just small TCP ack packets during download test.  I tried setting it to 1400 anyway.  Unfortunately it didn't help.<br><br><div class="bquote">(Although I did not try connecting wired to the router connected directly to the Clear router when it was at the default of 1500.... I only connected with my end setup of "Clear Home Modem-->Wifi Router as AP-->Wifi Router as client bridge-->ethernet to PC"<br> </div>Hmmm.. so your connection is through 2 wireless devices wirelessly with good speed?  That means there is really no significant interference between WiMAX and WiFi.  What are your wireless routers?  I read a review somewhere online that the Clear Spot WiMAX to WiFi device cuts the throughput by half.  But not as bad as what I got (1/4) with Netgear WGR614v6.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23596951</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:32:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23594968</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Do your traceroutes filter out though this guy?<br>75.94.255.161 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23594968</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:48:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23591243</link>
<description><![CDATA[kram1984j posted : try changing the max MTU to 1400 not 1500 in your router.  My router was performing poorly with 1500 set both in much slower speed tests and more lag.  (Although I did not try connecting wired to the router connected directly to the Clear router when it was at the default of 1500.... I only connected with my end setup of "Clear Home Modem-->Wifi Router as AP-->Wifi Router as client bridge-->ethernet to PC"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23591243</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:02:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23590571</link>
<description><![CDATA[ygtai posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1694339" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1694339');">kram1984j</a>:</small><br><br>hmm it's fast connected through your wifi modem wired but slow over wireless....  Have you seen faster speeds with that same wifi modem connected to your previous ISP or did you experience the same problems?<br> </div>With my previous ISP (TWC RoadRunner 7Mbps) I constantly got a stable 6.5-6.8Mbps, no matter wired or wireless.<br><br>So I suspected it were WiMAX Wi-Fi interference.  I did a little test trying to identify it using a desktop computer (wired to router) and a notebook computer (wireless to router).<br><br>1) Background transfer between desktop (wired) and notebook (wireless) using iperf I got 16-20Mbps.  So wired to wireless on the router is normal.<br><br>2) In addition to the desktop-notebook transfer, I tested internet (speedtest.net) to notebook (wireless) at the same time.  I got 10-17Mbps desktop-notebook and 2Mbps internet-notebook.  So it looks that Wi-Fi was not affected by WiMAX too much.<br><br>3) Then in addition to the test in 2), I added internet to desktop (wired) test at the same time.  I still got 10-17Mbps desktop-notebook, 2Mbps internet-notebook, and 7-9Mbps internet-desktop.  The combined WiMAX speed was still fast.  It seems that WiMAX was not affected as well.<br><br>So it's probably not interference.  Then I don't get it.  Changing MTU probably doesn't help because it was set to 1500 and I only care about downstream.  Double NAT is also not a problem because it's fast when wired.  What else could it be?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23590571</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:00:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23590517</link>
<description><![CDATA[kram1984j posted : hmm it's fast connected through your wifi modem wired but slow over wireless....  Have you seen faster speeds with that same wifi modem connected to your previous ISP or did you experience the same problems?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23590517</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:29:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23589825</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I'm in San Antonio, TX.  My latency is from 50 to 120+ ms, with a typical of 80-100ms.  I don't think there's anything you can do to improve that, unless perhaps there's a base station on your roof, under which I don't want to live...:P<br><br>But I do have a slowdown problem when connecting my computer to the Clear home modem through a wireless router (Netgear WGR614v6) wirelessly.  If I use the Netgear's wired LAN port, I get a great 6-11Mbps throughput, with 9-11Mbps not unusual.  But if I connect through the Netgear's wireless channel, I get around 2Mbps all the time.  Any ideas?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23589825</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:09:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23577356</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : My ping in chicago suburbs is usually around 50ms-60ms.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23577356</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:40:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23575499</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : WiMAX is capable of latency as low as 10ms, Clear is just not currently not optimizing their network for latency.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23575499</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:19:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23575138</link>
<description><![CDATA[Broo posted : WiMax latency is going to be around 100ms; it will never be as fast as a hard-wired connection (i.e. Cable/DSL/FIOS) as it is a wireless technology.<br><br>I have had Clear WiMax in Atlanta, GA for about 5 months now; average is around 100ms (vs. 10ms on BellSouth DSL).<br><br>Another thing to note is that Clear WiMax is very prone to slow-downs during peak hours (I believe they oversold it in the Atlanta area) and they are now cap bandwidth if you saturate your connection for more than 10 mins.  I am seeing a drop to 1Mbps after I use my connection for about 10 mins...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23575138</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:41:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23318292</link>
<description><![CDATA[BK posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by TheRedDuke :</small><br><br>Uhh my connection was wireless with TWC too so stop with the whole wired vs wireless argument.<br><br>If one provide can give me excellent service using wireless internet I expect the same from another company who's competing for my business.<br><br>And your whole "everything should be wired" is just dumb. So I should use Ethernet cables for my 2 laptops, my iPhone (which is impossible in case you didn't know), my 360 Arcade, my playstation 3, AND my gaming desktop?<br><br>Umm yeah sure I'll get back to you on that!<br><br>Again is there anything I can do to lower the latency on my end?<br> </div>desreversti is correct, i was referring to your actual connection not your home wireless. <br><br>and yes, if you only care about latency, everything should be wired. that is the nature of the technology of wired vs wireless. but in home wireless situations the range is not very long so the difference is not noticeable. <br><br>i'm 100% seriously when i say if the latency is bothering you that much just switch back to TWC because there isn't anything you can do<br><small>--<br>-formerly sMoKeNiNja</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23318292</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:37:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23314188</link>
<description><![CDATA[desreversti posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by TheRedDuke :</small><br><br>Uhh my connection was wireless with TWC too so stop with the whole wired vs wireless argument.<br><br>If one provide can give me excellent service using wireless internet I expect the same from another company who's competing for my business.<br><br>And your whole "everything should be wired" is just dumb. So I should use Ethernet cables for my 2 laptops, my iPhone (which is impossible in case you didn't know), my 360 Arcade, my playstation 3, AND my gaming desktop?<br><br>Umm yeah sure I'll get back to you on that!<br><br>Again is there anything I can do to lower the latency on my end?<br> </div>I think that BK was referring to the "last mile" when he mentioned wired versus wireless. For TWC to work, they ran a wired connection to your house and then you used a wi-fi router to get a short range wireless network in your house. For Clear, they use a wireless connection from a base station to your Clear modem. Then you can use a wi-fi conection to give your local network a wireless connection.<br><br>I would have to agree that in terms of last mile connectivity, a wired connection is superior over a wireless one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23314188</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:31:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23311755</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : And disable all P2P applications, servers, and other applications when you need low latency.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23311755</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:07:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23311753</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : Not really, you can tweak your OS a bit. Google "Windows Vista TCP/IP tweaks". There's a way Windows handles packets to send full sized packets that can add latency. In some applications, latency can be reduced 40ms, such as WoW. Vista / 7 disable some newer / advanced TCP/IP features you can tweak.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23311753</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:06:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23311698</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Uhh my connection was wireless with TWC too so stop with the whole wired vs wireless argument.<br><br>If one provide can give me excellent service using wireless internet I expect the same from another company who's competing for my business.<br><br>And your whole "everything should be wired" is just dumb. So I should use Ethernet cables for my 2 laptops, my iPhone (which is impossible in case you didn't know), my 360 Arcade, my playstation 3, AND my gaming desktop?<br><br>Umm yeah sure I'll get back to you on that!<br><br>Again is there anything I can do to lower the latency on my end?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23311698</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:55:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23309760</link>
<description><![CDATA[BK posted : Latency is a factor in how fast a webpage will load, yes. The bandwidth of your connection also plays a factor, as well as the bandwidth of the websites server too. <br><br>You are never going to get the speeds from a wireless connection as you will a wired one. plain and simple. if you aren't happy with it now switch back to TWC<br><small>--<br>-formerly sMoKeNiNja</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23309760</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 11:30:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23307494</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Ok thanks for answering that clearly and with no run around.<br><br>So double NAT and DHCP isn't the issue then right? <br><br>I've noticed that the latency (or Ping) with TWC was between 19 and 25 ms.<br><br>And with Clear 4G/WiMax it's usually around 99. The lowest I've seen the latency (Ping) is 78 ms.<br><br>And from what I've read latency determines how fast webpages will load.  So I'm asking you guys is that true? Is there anything else I can do that will decrease the latency?  My setup right now is this.<br><br>Clear Modem (Motorola Device) ---> Clear Voice (VoIP) ---> Linksys WRT610N]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23307494</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:51:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23307157</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : It won't make it at all faster, all DHCP does is assign IP and DNS. There will be no difference in performance, and you will lose functionality such as NetBIOS resolution of the modem and the modems auto configuration ability.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23307157</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:02:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23305942</link>
<description><![CDATA[BK posted : disabling DHCP won't make it (noticeably) faster<br><small>--<br>-formerly sMoKeNiNja</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23305942</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:16:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23305308</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : @ wOg<br><br>Because the webpages are loading very slowly over here and I'm trying to do all I can to make the internet as fast or faster than when we had time warner cable.<br><br>If i disable DHCP on the Linksys router will I have to do anything after that?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23305308</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:14:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23305111</link>
<description><![CDATA[gpctexas posted : Your linksys router will not be able to send traffic to the clear modem to get on the internet.<br><br>The clear modem is supplying all this already to your linksys router with dhcp.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23305111</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:52:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304939</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : May I ask why you want to do that anyway? You have to assign your router an IP, what's the problem with using DHCP? In my case the only reason I made such a configuration was to free resources on the router for other tasks. In your case there's nothing to gain.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304939</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:23:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304838</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : If I don't do this whole "route business" what will happen if I just simply uncheck enable dhcp?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304838</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:55:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304719</link>
<description><![CDATA[gpctexas posted : Check your linksys router manual to se if it supports adding routes<br><br>you will need a route that states 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 be sent to 192.168.15.1<br><br>your wan ip can be 192.168.15.2 mask 255.255.255.0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304719</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:05:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304290</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : "I you disable dhcp on the clear modem, you will have to assign a static ip address to your wan interface of your linksys router so the 2 devices can still talk to each other. You will also have to assign a default route to route the traffic from your linksys router to the clear modem."<br><br>Okay now we're getting somewhere....<br><br>As for assigning the Static IP address to my Linksys Router would I do that before or after I disable the DHCP on the clear modem?<br><br>And what exactly do you mean default route to route the traffic"<br><br>What does that involve? I'm sorry but I need specifics...steps would be nice.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304290</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:10:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304226</link>
<description><![CDATA[gpctexas posted : I you disable dhcp on the clear modem, you will have to assign a static ip address to your wan interface of your linksys router so the 2 devices can still talk to each other.  You will also have to assign a default route to route the traffic from your linksys router to the clear modem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304226</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:40:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304139</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I'm just saying if i choose "disable dhcp" for the modem and I do NOTHING else<br><br>Will that destroy the internet/wireless at my house?  Will everything work properly as before?<br><br>That's the most important thing....forget all that other stuff you were saying.<br><br>If I simply uncheck the "dhcp enabled" box within the WiMax modem will my internet continue going on like before of have I done something major which requires other things to be done?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304139</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:26:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304073</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : You can still use the features on the 610N, wireless will work, quality of service, the switch, it just turns off the second NAT and redundant features on your router and frees up resources. It's more efficient to turn off the gateway features on the router instead and let the modem handle IP address assignment and whatnot because NAT can't currently be disabled. Still I don't think the difference will be major if instead you went into the modem and gave the router a persistent IP address and then forwarded (DMZ feature) all traffic to the router and used the router to manage everything.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23304073</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:02:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23303779</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I have the Linksys WRT610N as well...weird coincidence.<br><br>Anyways I'd rather not disable the routers settings. I like those. Wouldn't I be fine just disabling DHCP on the Clear Modem (the motorola one)?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23303779</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:05:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23303471</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : Here's what I did. I have the Linksys WRT610N - I don't know if the default firmware will let you do this, but with DD-WRT custom firmware I disabled NAT, DHCP and all that on the Linksys and it's acting strictly as a router rather than gateway. The Motorola DHCP is passing IPs and handling the firewall duties.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23303471</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:37:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23302802</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I have a similar setup -- Motorola modem and home router with Linksys VOIP module in between.  I can connect to the 192.168.15.1 Motorola modem just fine.<br>However -- The Motorola model does NAT (Network Address Translation) as (probably) does your home router that your computers connect to. If your computer uses any IP address not in the 192.168.15.xxx range then this proves your home router is using NAT and translating the IP address from the modem into a different range of IP addresses.  In this case you probably should  not disable DHCP on your home router -- it will make it complicated and you'll have to to configure static IP addreses on your home computers, as well as DNS server info, gateway address, etc.  The reason for this is that DHCP will not pass through a NAT device, the nature of NAT renders requires this behavior.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23302802</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:08:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23302021</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Thanks! Do you have to be connected directly thru ethernet to do so?<br><br>Also I have a Linksys Router and Clear Voice.<br><br>I know the Linksys router has DHCP enabled and I want to keep it that way and disable the DHCP on all the other devices.  That should improve the latency for WiMax right? Cuz right now my download speeds and uploads are decent but the webpage loading is kinda slow.  So that's why I want to log in to look at the settings and see what I can do to improve that part.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23302021</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:08:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23301980</link>
<description><![CDATA[w0g posted : If you have the CPEi 25150, it definitely has what you're talking about. The default address is usually &raquo;<A HREF="http://192.168.15.1/" >192.168.15.1/</A> - you can also try "http://mywimax./" and if none of these work, try the address of your connections default gateway (ipconfig /all).<br><br>Password by default is motorola.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.aimless.us/">www.aimless.us</a> - irc.aimless.us channel #fix</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Access-to-Clear-Modem-23301980</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:00:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Access to Clear Modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Access-to-Clear-Modem-23301859</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Is there a way to change settings for the Clear modem. Like for example according to people Ive spoke with both the router and the modem have DHCP turned on which could affect signal and quality of speed.  So I was wondering if there's a homepage for the modem with all the settings there that I can access. Like how for linksys routers it's 192.168.1.1<br><br>I just got it 2 days ago in Raleigh, NC. So far it's OKAY. The webpages are loading kinda slow though when compared to TWC.<br><br>However I think it's cuz we're in the middle of the transition. Also I was using it on my mom's laptop wirelessly connected to the Linksys router.<br><br>I have the Clear Voice as well which so far seems to be exactly the same as TWC phone service.<br><br>But my main issue is to get to the Motorola modems home page so I can look at the settings. <br><br>IS that possible or not?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Access-to-Clear-Modem-23301859</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:42:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

