http://www.dslreports.com/forum/MLPPP-Stability-23305139 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:08 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23311246
If you upgrade don't forget to erase all data in NVRAM to make sure that the new firmware runs with the correct settings. you do this in Administration, configuration, Restore Default Configuration section.

it says unstable... but I'm using it since it was released and I never had a single problem with it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23311246 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:09:07 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23310797
I never changed the MTU, though, and my connection (was doing MLPPP with the unofficial MLPPP support) was fine before I switched. I'm not knowledgeable when it comes to these things, but why would the same MTU value work with unofficial MLPPP support but not with the official one? I know they're different, obviously, but as far as I know we weren't given any particular instructions along with the login change.

It's quite irritating, but what can I do? When a problem appears the first logical step is find out what changed, but here, the only thing that did is something I have absolutely no power over.

Anyway, just a little warning that sometimes you get unlucky doing something apparently trivial. Most people are fine switching to MLPPP support, but nothing is risk-free.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23310797 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:11:13 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23310327 said by slimeblob:

As soon as I switched to the "@wiredhighspeed" address with MLPPP support, my browsing speed took a serious hit. And since then, whenever I use torrents, my browsing speed becomes absolutely horrible (like dial-up, except with very frequent "connection timed out" errors).
it looks like a MTU issue...

Which Tomato/MLPPP version are you using?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23310327 Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:11:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23308026 said by HiVolt:

Haha, I think someone is playing a dirty joke and reset my connection after I posted that, lol... It was probably Rick slipping on a banana peel and smashing the keyboard in the process. :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23308026 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:09:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23307814
It's apparently not a common issue, but I know for a fact that the switch to official MLPPP caused it. It was fine, I switched and the problems were there right away.

Ah well... it's either that or be throttled down to less than 10% of my regular speed. I recently downloaded half a dozen free video games that the company distributed via torrent, around 400 MBs each, and it would have taken forever without MLPPP.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23307814 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:03:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23307526 said by HiVolt:

Currently connected for 55 days when I last rebooted my router for some config changes.
Haha, I think someone is playing a dirty joke and reset my connection after I posted that, lol...

Status 1 of 1 Connected
MLPPP Single-link
Connection Uptime 0 days, 08:40:37
--
1-for-October. (1-7-4)
And now, back to your regularly scheduled losing.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23307526 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:53:24 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23306187
BTW, the datacenter's router is a $55 Asus router loaded with the non-MLPPP version of Tomato 1.25. Works like a charm.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23306187 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:22:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23306058 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23306058 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:42:50 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305401 --
Please take a moment and visit »www.competitivebroadband.com/consumer/]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305401 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:02:57 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305598 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305598 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:33:41 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305575 --
1-for-October. (1-7-4)
And now, back to your regularly scheduled losing.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305575 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:23:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305486 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305486 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:36:47 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305443
I've been using MLPPP for many months (before and after it's been officially supported) and I've never had any issues. It's rock solid.

Cheers,
-pablo
--
openSUSE 11.1;KDE
ISP: TekSavvy DSL; backhauled via a 6KM wireless link]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-MLPPP-Stability-23305443 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:06:53 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/MLPPP-Stability-23305139
I was wondering, since Teksavvy started "officially" supporting MLPPP a few months back, have people had any problems/complaints after being switched over?

I may be interested in switching to MLPPP, but was wondering if anyone had any problems/complaints regarding degradation of service/speed? My main concern would be stability of the line (that is, I can always be online when I need to be, with no unexpected dropping of connections).

Thanks!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/MLPPP-Stability-23305139 Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:14:19 EDT