<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;CIsco 2950 slow network transfers&#x27; in forum &#x27;Cisco&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23309300</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:53:28 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:53:28 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23339545</link>
<description><![CDATA[NOCMan posted : Also check the duplex of the device connected to f0/2.<br><br>With Linux I always force both ends 100/Full..<br><br>mii-tool ethX --force 100BaseTX-FD<br><br>conf t<br>int f0/2<br>speed 100<br>duplex full.<br><br>See if the errors go away.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23339545</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:26:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23311781</link>
<description><![CDATA[scrummie02 posted : thanks!  I'll try that. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23311781</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:14:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23311369</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :    That is possible , it is 100 megabits per seconds per port , if you  are getting 8 megabytes transfer thats approx. 80 megabits per second which isn;t terrible .  When you do a trAnsfer file look at the  counters with a show interf. summary and see what is actually being transfered .   You might want to turn the load interval down on the ports to like 60 seconds to get a better idea what the traffic,  this will give a 1 minute rate versus the default of 5 minutes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23311369</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:46:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23311386</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :    Also clear all the counters ,  you should not be seeing any collisions in a  full duplex environment .  If these continue then hardcode both the switchports and the nics to 100 full, there should be  "0"  collisions on the ports . ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23311386</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:45:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23310464</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bink posted : I think you might have the MB and Mb thing confused.  On a Fast Ethernet/100Mbps switch, 8MBps is pretty good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23310464</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:47:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23310440</link>
<description><![CDATA[scrummie02 posted : they're both set to auto and ther are some errors but not a lot.  Here is the output from one interface:<br> Auto-duplex (Full), Auto Speed (100), 100BaseTX/FX<br>  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00<br>  Last input 00:00:30, output 00:00:01, output hang never<br>  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never<br>  Queueing strategy: fifo<br>  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops<br>  5 minute input rate 6060000 bits/sec, 548 packets/sec<br>  5 minute output rate 148000 bits/sec, 275 packets/sec<br>     112048007 packets input, 3668108221 bytes<br>     Received 263869 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles<br>     8 input errors, 8 CRC, 0 frame, 11 overrun, 11 ignored<br>     0 watchdog, 178699 multicast<br>     0 input packets with dribble condition detected<br>     91296795 packets output, 1851865801 bytes, 0 underruns<br>     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets<br>     0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred<br>     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier<br>     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out<br>FastEthernet0/2 is up, line protocol is up<br>  Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0002.fd74.0182 (bia 0002.fd74.0182)<br>  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,<br>     reliability 255/255, txload 15/255, rxload 1/255<br>  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set<br>  Keepalive not set<br>  Auto-duplex (Full), Auto Speed (100), 100BaseTX/FX<br>  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00<br>  Last input never, output 00:00:01, output hang never<br>  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never<br>  Queueing strategy: fifo<br>  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops<br>  5 minute input rate 148000 bits/sec, 275 packets/sec<br>  5 minute output rate 6103000 bits/sec, 552 packets/sec<br>     568557916 packets input, 1611993662 bytes<br>     Received 2146056 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles<br>     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored<br>     0 watchdog, 1486061 multicast<br>     0 input packets with dribble condition detected<br>     342152395 packets output, 1074284809 bytes, 0 underruns<br>     1853 output errors, 9072 collisions, 1 interface resets<br>     0 babbles, 1853 late collision, 1007 deferred<br>     0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier<br>     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out<br><small>--<br>'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.' <br>Thomas Jefferson<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23310440</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:38:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23310084</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :    Its unclear how you have your interfaces configured.  How are the switchports configured ? As auto ?   If so then the nics on the servers  "must" also be auto  . You cannot set the server end as hardcoded and leave the switch as auto or vice versa .  This creates a  speed duplex mismatch if you do .  If both ends match then you will have to look at server settings as the 2950 should be able to give the full 100 meg thruput on your ports .  If you do a show interface status on your ports does it show  100/full  ?  If you do a show int count errors  does it show any errors on those ports ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23310084</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:13:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>CIsco 2950 slow network transfers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23309300</link>
<description><![CDATA[scrummie02 posted : Hello all.<br>I have a 2950 catalyst 100MB switch.  Connected to it I have my workstation, my WHS box. Linux box and a VMWare ESXi box.  They're all in the same vlan.  The other vlan is my IP phone, my vmware ESXi server (on another interface), and wireless.<br><br>In any case, on both vlans and with speeds on the NICS and the ports switched to the same (i.e. 100 MB full, auto negotiate), I'm getting very slow network transfer speeds with it comes to SMB transfers and NFS transfers.  I'm only getting about 8 MBs.  I am thinking I should be getting faster than that.  I've been googleing but to no avail.  Anyone run into this before? <br><small>--<br>'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.' <br>Thomas Jefferson<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CIsco-2950-slow-network-transfers-23309300</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:47:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

