<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Bill submitted to Congress to revamp USF&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23303683</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:28:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:28:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Bill submitted to Congress to revamp USF</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23312940</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : They are the beneficiaries of the USF system.  The monies collected go to them.<br><br>What business wouldn't like it:  A charge, required by Government, placed on your competitors, which in turn is paid to you.<br><br>It's incredible.   And yet, it's what we have.<br><small>--<br>"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23312940</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:40:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bill submitted to Congress to revamp USF</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23309525</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/129458" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=129458');">KrK</a>:</small><br><br>Telcos will be all behind this.     Cable and the like will come out against, methinks.<br> </div>Telcos like it because it caps taxes on their systems and spreads the costs to all their untaxed competitors. Why wouldn't they like it.<br><br>But I still think they should just kill off the USF altogether.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj1k"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj2k"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj3k"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br><br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23309525</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:14:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bill submitted to Congress to revamp USF</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23304431</link>
<description><![CDATA[KrK posted : This is the plan.    If they can collect USF fees on VOIP, Wireless, or other Internet based communications, they they can prop up the old Telco model forever.   Basically, even if you're rendered obsolete and eclipsed, you still will be funded by taxes on your competitors.<br><br>Telcos will be all behind this.     Cable and the like will come out against, methinks.<br><small>--<br>"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23304431</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:36:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bill submitted to Congress to revamp USF</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23303683</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : Some good things in there. But a lot of bad too. Better if they just killed it off altogether. The bill would also start collecting USF fees on VOIP & Wireless providers too.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091106/pl_nm/us_telecom_fund_congress" >news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091106/pl_&middot;&middot;&middot;congress</A><br><div class="bquote">U.S. lawmakers said on Friday they introduced a measure aimed at overhauling an annual fund intended to ensure nationwide telephone service in high-cost, rural areas by including money for high-speed Internet use.<br><br>The bill, introduced by U.S. Representatives Rick Boucher, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet, and Lee Terry, a Nebraska Republican, would establish a competitive bidding process and cap the fund.<br><br>Rural carriers such as CenturyTel Inc's Embarq and United States Cellular Corp have said funding should stay based on actual costs and said a cap would discourage investment and jeopardize coverage in hard-to-serve areas.<br><br>The bill would broaden the base of who pays into the fund to include companies that provide Internet calling services over wireless, cable and satellite networks, as well as the traditional telephone companies and local exchange service providers.<br><br>The bill, called the Universal Service Reform Act of 2009, would also direct the FCC, with the help of a federal-state joint board, to set policies including methodologies to determine access to the fund.<br><br>AT&T and Verizon lauded the measure, saying<b> it also puts an end to traffic pumping,</b> which is when third-party companies route adult chat and "free" conference calls through rural exchanges in order to generate fees.</div>More info:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.multichannel.com/article/383142-Boucher_Circulating_Draft_Of_Bill_To_Extend_Universal_Service_Fund_To_Broadband.php" >www.multichannel.com/article/383&middot;&middot;&middot;band.php</A><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj1k"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj2k"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/tkj3k"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br><br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Bill-submitted-to-Congress-to-revamp-USF-23303683</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:30:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

