DrStrange
Technically feasible
Premium
join:2001-07-23
West Hartford, CT
 ·Stephouse Networks
 ·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Latency & Packet loss @NAC this afternoon?
Latency is greater than usual, and there are period of slow/no response. |
|
pende_tim
Premium
join:2004-01-04
Andover, NJ
 ·ProLog
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Online DSL
| I am seeinmg an ongoing issue with my line monitoring ping times.
About 2 AM Monday 11/9/2009 the East coast report stopped responding for a couple of hours on all my test lines. When It came back, the ping times had taken a step jump of about 35 ms from 10 ms to 45 ms range.
They are still showing this increase. Anyone else seeing the same thing?
Manual pings to NYC show times in the 10 ms range.
Here is a link to the reports page: »ny-monitor.dslreports.com/r3/cri···ange=d:w
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. |
|
DrStrange
Technically feasible
Premium
join:2001-07-23
West Hartford, CT
·Stephouse Networks
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| reply to DrStrange
Still showing a bit higher latency than normal [30ms vs. about 20-25], but without the lag spikes and packet loss. There's a hop in there [#6] I haven't seen before. The Geobytes address locator says it's in Australia, but that would add a lot more than 5-10ms latency. Several other locators put it in either California or Toronto, Canada. The only plausible location [not that i believe any of them] is Toronto.
Whois says it belongs to Equinix [haven't heard of them before].
That hop doesn't respond to ping or traceroute as an endpoint. If I were a tinfoil hat, I'd wonder if the 5-10ms was taking it to northern VA and back so the NSA could copy data. I suppose I could make an equally circumstantial case that they were routing it through Toronto to keep it away from the NSA  .
Anyone know anything more about this? |
|
