 RhaasPremium join:2005-12-19 Bernie, MO | reply to iansltx
Re: DSL Deployment - How hard w\Verizon as the ILEC? ADSL2+ Annex A |  ADSL2+ Annex M |  Annex M Profile - Annex A was the same. |
Thats it. I just ran some tests with Annex-M on our Ericsson DSLAM down to my office @ 11kft (single pair).
A full DB more attenuation when using Annex M on the upstream side. Speed tests were 19M x 1.1M on Annex A, and 19M x 2.0M on Annex M. |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Interesting. However what's the big deal with a single db of attenuation over the lack thereof, when the connection provides 1 Mbps more on the upload side?
Thanks for doing the test. 35/4 at 11kfeet (bonded ADSL2+ Annex M) seems like an attractive proposition when the competition doesn't go above 2 Mbps up and 15 Mbps down... |
|
 RhaasPremium join:2005-12-19 Bernie, MO 1 edit | Acutally it's 4db attentuation on the upstream, I was looking at the SNR margin when I wrote that - Looking at one thing and writing another, sorry.
Just like wireless you have to be careful of your SNR margins, too little margin and the modem re-syncs and become unstable. We use 6db SNR as the target, however we will begin to see issues at 4db or less. Generally I have my DSLAM's setup to begin fall back at 3db to slower speeds to increase the SNR. That 1db of SNR margin can easly be a go-nogo point. |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Sure. The drastically decreased upstream SNR is interesting, however for businesses that are close-in bonded ADSL2+ Annex M seems promising. |
|