site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·WISP Forum FAQ ·WISP Directory ·Radio Mobile
AuthorAll Replies


Rhaas
Premium
join:2005-12-19
Bernie, MO

reply to iansltx

Re: DSL Deployment - How hard w\Verizon as the ILEC?

Click for full size
ADSL2+ Annex A
Click for full size
ADSL2+ Annex M
Click for full size
Annex M Profile - Annex A was the same.
Thats it. I just ran some tests with Annex-M on our Ericsson DSLAM down to my office @ 11kft (single pair).

A full DB more attenuation when using Annex M on the upstream side.
Speed tests were 19M x 1.1M on Annex A, and 19M x 2.0M on Annex M.

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

Interesting. However what's the big deal with a single db of attenuation over the lack thereof, when the connection provides 1 Mbps more on the upload side?

Thanks for doing the test. 35/4 at 11kfeet (bonded ADSL2+ Annex M) seems like an attractive proposition when the competition doesn't go above 2 Mbps up and 15 Mbps down...



Rhaas
Premium
join:2005-12-19
Bernie, MO

1 edit

Acutally it's 4db attentuation on the upstream, I was looking at the SNR margin when I wrote that - Looking at one thing and writing another, sorry.

Just like wireless you have to be careful of your SNR margins, too little margin and the modem re-syncs and become unstable. We use 6db SNR as the target, however we will begin to see issues at 4db or less. Generally I have my DSLAM's setup to begin fall back at 3db to slower speeds to increase the SNR. That 1db of SNR margin can easly be a go-nogo point.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Sure. The drastically decreased upstream SNR is interesting, however for businesses that are close-in bonded ADSL2+ Annex M seems promising.


Saturday, 02-Jun 09:36:11 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics