site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

1 edit

reply to xenophon

Re: And it may kill cable too

said by xenophon:

If those channels allow streaming to hardware based players, I won't need cable TV anymore. Cable/Sat must be nervous about this as streaming is clearly the future, not broadcasting when we want to watch things, or forcing us to subscribe to channels we don't want.
TWC doesn't want you to cut the cord... so they want to have the cap to keep you from "not needing" cable TV anymore. In the Comcast HSI Forum Bandwidth Thread, it's been shown that the 250GB cap has nothing to do with addressing congestion. Instead, it's about preventing these competitive hardware based players from establishing a foothold.

See: »Re: Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here
--
"We're going to start at one end of (Fallujah), and we're not going to stop until we get to the other. If there's anybody left when that happens, we're going to turn around and we're going to go back and finish it."
Lt. Col. Pete Newell: 1st Inf. US Army

xenophon

join:2007-09-17

^And then I simply move to another broadband provider not tied to broadcast television.


jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

1 edit

you mean THE other ONE? What if they're too slow and also have a cap? 8-\


Sunday, 03-Jun 07:47:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics