site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
252
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Vonage
·ViaTalk

Content is more important

The problem here is everyone wants high bandwidth connections, yet they would only use a fraction of them. I really dont see a normal user using more then 15 M connection. People should be demanding more content. ie Netflix, gaming, HD-TV. Rather then the constant shrill ' we dont have the fastest. ' . The result would be these companies would have to upgrade to keep up with consumer demands. Buggy , horse .etc.
--
They Live... We Sleep...

“Spreading the wealth around” never results in a better outcome for people. It always results in destruction.



gatorkram
KaBOOM Baby
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Winterville, NC
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Suddenlink

said by DaveDude:

The problem here is everyone wants high bandwidth connections, yet they would only use a fraction of them. I really dont see a normal user using more then 15 M connection. People should be demanding more content. ie Netflix, gaming, HD-TV. Rather then the constant shrill ' we dont have the fastest. ' . The result would be these companies would have to upgrade to keep up with consumer demands. Buggy , horse .etc.
I tend to agree with you to a point, but the issue is, a lot of places won't invest to offer services, when the infrastructure isn't already in place to deliver them.

I have netflix, and I love my roku device. It's just a drop in the bucket though.
--
Give me bandwidth or give me death!
»/testhistory/661871/4f240

jdjbuffalo

join:2004-01-17
Denver, CO

reply to DaveDude
The thing is you're only looking at it from one user's perspective. Imagine a 4 person household. Mom, dad and 2 teenage kids. Now imagine all of them watching different HD streaming TV/movies in their rooms. You'd need about 50 - 60 Mpbs connection to handle that at the same time. This is just one example and there are a lot others that could use a lot more than 15Mbps.

Also, while 15Mbps is enough for many things we need today (the average in the US is 6Mpbs). As we get better connections, we'll get things that use more bandwidth.


gkar1

join:2001-03-29
Chicago, IL

1 edit

reply to DaveDude

said by DaveDude:

The problem here is everyone wants high bandwidth connections, yet they would only use a fraction of them. I really dont see a normal user using more then 15 M connection. People should be demanding more content. ie Netflix, gaming, HD-TV. Rather then the constant shrill ' we dont have the fastest. ' . The result would be these companies would have to upgrade to keep up with consumer demands. Buggy , horse .etc.
No, they would not upgrade. Their answer is to impose usage caps that effectively transform the $100 50/20 connection you have into an overpriced illusion. They will also throttle you if you try to use your connection to its fullest.

Sunday, 03-Jun 07:48:04 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics