site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1098
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


jchambers28

join:2007-05-12
Alma, AR

wow 768 kbps

768 k is a joke now days. I have cox and have a upload a 1 to 2 megs vs the sloooow 768 k speed.


The Limit
Premium
join:2007-09-25
Greensboro, NC
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Windstream

But we are talking about DSL here, not cable.

From what I understand, the circuit has to be upgraded in order to increase upload speed. I mean, I would love a 1.5-2.0 megabit upload speed on a 12 megabit download profile, but unless the price goes up, I don't see that happening. I mean, it's possible. I can get 12 megabit upload, but like one user said, no point in upgrading because upload matters more.
--
Do or do not, there is no try! - Yoda



Napsterbater
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA
Reviews:
·VOIPo
·Windstream
·BroadVoice

1 edit

All they would have to do is enable Annex M assuming their DSALM support annex M and clean up the line if stat aren't good enough, they could get up to about 3megs from what iv read.

Also 12meg has been at 768k wince it arrived witch was about 2 times that of the other packages I'm just hoping they keep the same type of speed differences.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

1 edit

Might want to check this out:

»Re: DSL Deployment - How hard w\Verizon as the ILEC?

EDIT: fixed link



Napsterbater
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA

"Board does not exist"

check what out?


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Let's try this again:

»Re: DSL Deployment - How hard w\Verizon as the ILEC?


firehawk618

join:2003-05-29

reply to jchambers28

said by jchambers28:

768 k is a joke now days. I have cox and have a upload a 1 to 2 megs vs the sloooow 768 k speed.
Um, 768k to 1Mb isn't a big difference......


Napsterbater
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA

reply to iansltx
What am I looking at? I know annex A maxes at 1meg but I'm pretty sure Windstream's ADSL2+ gear can support Annex M.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

SNR is lower on upstream with Annex M. Expected but possibly problematic. Also, upstream maxes at around 2 Mbps even with Annex M. I also wouldn't be terribly surprised if a fair amount of WS's gear can't support Annex M either on the subscriber or DSLAM side.



Napsterbater
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-28
Milledgeville, GA

My SNR is 13.5 with ATTN of 8.5 I could probably get close to 3meg (Annex M's Max).

At one point someone in the WS forums posted the type of DSLAMS in use by WS for ADSL2+ and I'm 90% sure they do support Annex M



HiVolt
Premium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:12
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
·TekSavvy Cable

2 edits

reply to firehawk618

said by firehawk618:

said by jchambers28:

768 k is a joke now days. I have cox and have a upload a 1 to 2 megs vs the sloooow 768 k speed.
Um, 768k to 1Mb isn't a big difference......
If Windstream DSL is PPPoE based (very likely), then 768k sync rate turns into something like 650kbps actual speed, due to approximately 15% of various overheads.

Here in Canada I have 800k upstream on my PPPoE DSL, and the actual speed is about 680kbps.
--
1-for-October (1-7-4)
2-for-November (2-3-1)
And now, back to your regularly scheduled losing.

Friday, 01-Jun 14:35:28 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics