site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
306
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

theeinstein
Premium
join:2003-07-31
Fernandina Beach, FL

Oh Yea..

Let's revisit the attempts by ALL carriers EXCEPT Verizon to shutter the requirement for cell sites to run for a minimum of 8 hrs during a prolonged power outage.. This stuff started after Katrina.... All the carriers lobbied against it EXCEPT Verizon.. WHY well Verizon ALREADY does this in most cases.

You pay for what you get!! once again this stands true.. Burn AT&T Burn..


JoeIac
Premium
join:2009-03-02
MA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

Totally Agree, Verizon costs more, and sometimes they lock down their network too much, but the performance I've seen has made it quite worthwhile.

And when you figure in the gimmicks and look at how many minutes a month we save from being on verizon with in calling, and the 10 favorite numbers feature, a comparable plan (without them) on ATT would cost a fortune


theeinstein
Premium
join:2003-07-31
Fernandina Beach, FL

Yea... you get what you pay for... Pretty amazing the length that corporate America will go to.. simply to stifle the truth!


glinc

join:2009-04-07
New York, NY

reply to theeinstein
Yea, it was funny when the black out in NY occurred and Verizon was the only one with service hahaha...all other carriers had no service at all


Friday, 01-Jun 14:39:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics