site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

verta

join:2007-05-29
Tallahassee, FL

reply to powerspec88

UMA

I will pay extra for a UMA phone. I don't need another box with an antenna in my house. Lots of folks who would want this already have wifi.


tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
Reviews:
·T-Mobile US

said by verta:

I will pay extra for a UMA phone. I don't need another box with an antenna in my house. Lots of folks who would want this already have wifi.
which is what makes femtocells so... pointless...

T-Mobile has been using UMA for home coverage for years now. Oh, and they DONT make you buy their router or femotcell. Just get a UMA capable phone and use your existing wifi for better coverage. Pay $10/mo and you get unlimited calling too.

Much better deal than Sprint/ATT/VZW are offering.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara

vanheve2

join:2005-12-16
Chicago, IL
Reviews:
·Comcast

I also like UMA because you don't need anything "extra". My parents have T-Mobile, but live in the sticks with poor coverage. I got them cheap UMA phones (without the $10/umlim) and works great. Now they have 5 "bars" at home and no extra monthly fee, and no equipment to buy (unless you don't have WiFi already).


Sunday, 03-Jun 02:34:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics