pandoraPremium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·ooma
·Google Voice
·Future Nine Corp..
 ·Comcast
| reply to cdru
Re: Frivolous Lawsuit said by cdru:said by NOCTech75:Does the lawsuit have anything to do with that particular ad? Was the infamous 3G map in the commercial? Yes (youtube clip) If the 3G coverage maps are accurate, I don't see any problem with the Verizon commercials.
I'm a former AT&T customer who migrated to Sprint. My prior use of the AT&T internet network was EDGE and it was awful compared to the 3G on Sprint. If AT&T thinks EDGE is great internet coverage, they are IMO sadly mistaken.
The maps clearly indicate 3G internet coverage, and the comments by the elves are about internet coverage. Nothing appears misleading in the commercials to me. They are about internet 3G coverage.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." |
|
 cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
 ·Frontier FiOS
| AT&T's complaint is that they feel that Verizon is telling customers that they won't have data coverage or be able to make calls in the non-blue areas. Yes the fine print says otherwise, but Verizon is playing up with the collective ignorance of the public that doesn't know the difference between GPRS, Edge, 3G or LTE. |
|
Reviews:
·Comcast
 ·AT&T Southeast
| said by cdru:AT&T's complaint is that they feel that Verizon is telling customers that they won't have data coverage or be able to make calls in the non-blue areas. Yes the fine print says otherwise, but Verizon is playing up with the collective ignorance of the public that doesn't know the difference between GPRS, Edge, 3G or LTE. Yes because AT&T never does any of that with their advertising. 
Commercial with the elves is legit, that has been shown to be true in court. AT&T should resolve their issues, not try to smash them down as if they don't exist. |
|
|
|
