republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

reply to Lazlow

Re: 1 Mbps a ploy?

It's not a matter of installation. In most cases the coper is already there. I don't think anyone is going to install new copper this late in the game, but they may reuse copper from before and just put DSL on it.

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

1 edit

iansltx

In tons of rural areas they buried the phone lines in the late 1970s, Govt program to help with ice storms. When they did that they only put down enough wire for about 3 lines for every two homes. That was all well and fine until isdn(way to far out for dsl) came around. Now those people cannot get better than dial up becuase they are no more lines open to use. So no, across the majority of the central core(ND straight south to TX) there is no available copper open. That copper is currently mostly in use for regular pots.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Uh, you can run DSL on the same pair as copper. Pretty sure that's what happens 95% of the time.


Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

2 edits

You can use one pair for phone or for ISDN but not both at the same time and there are only so many pairs buried (3 pairs for each pair of homes is common in rural areas). And again, DSL is not even available in most of these areas due to distance limitations.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Why are we talking about ISDN? Nobody uses ISDN, and it can't go 1 Mbps anyway.

DSL uses higher frequencies on the line so DSL + POTS can be on one line.


Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

1 edit

Because the limit of DSL is about 3 miles. Lots of these homes are 20 miles or further from the CO or a RT.

And yes ISDN is in use in many of these areas, where lines are available.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

Limit of DSL is about 24 kfeet, so closer to five miles.

Also, how is deploying RTs to bring people within DSL range more expensive than deploying fiber everywhere?

I'm not saying that fiber isn't the best option, all else equal. However the cost differential is HUGE between adding an RT here and there and deploying fiber. Again, I'd rather have 3 Mbps DSL than nothing, because the fiber stopped up the road.



Duramax08
A Challenger Appears
Premium
join:2008-08-03
San Antonio, TX

Start milking the crap out of that copper.


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2

Hey, I'd rather have DOCSIS 3 than copper and fiber than DOCSIS 3, but I'll take what I can get. Also, if the copper is cheaper for similar speeds, I'll take the copper.


Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

reply to iansltx
Either way they are going to have to bury new line. It is not going to be just a RT here and there it is going to be a lot of RTs (even at 5 miles). Since the inner circles (assuming radiating out from a town) are going to be passed by fiber (which is what feeds RTs) anyway, it is probably just as cost effective to run straight fiber. Yes, from the last RT out it would be much cheaper to just put in a RT(no new stuff to be buried), but between the last RT and the CO you are not going to see a huge difference in price.


Saturday, 02-Jun 03:27:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics