site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
136
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Reno
Premium
join:2008-10-26
Keller, TX

It's about Football

What everyone always misses is it's not about DirecTV as a company, it's about their exclusive NFL rights.

Imagine how badly Verizon (FIOS) and ATT (Uverse) want to take over DirectTV to get access to that? I'm sure another part of it would be to herd existing DirectTV customers into FIOS or ATT as well.

I really like Uverse (better than FIOS actually) as a service except for the limit of 1 to 2 (depending) HD channels on in a house at the same time. Imagine I want to watch an HD show in one room while recording another. Anyone else in the house is stuck with SD programming. That is the real flaw of Uverse that needs to be addressed. Otherwise, Uverse is a lot better than FIOS from what I've seen.

jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

Unless you mind the picture quality. They're both expensive. I've had both. I currently have Uverse ( for 10 more days), and it's a pain when I want to *record* two programs and watch a third all in HD. Fios didn't have that problem. ...and did I mention the picture quality Fios has over Uverse?


Saturday, 02-Jun 03:35:55 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics