site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
152
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Taget

join:2004-07-29

It wouldn't be accurate to say they ignored broadband...

...that's why they bought Time-Warer which turned out to be a great move on their part (and why they even still exist right now and why their stock holders from back then have anything worth anything).

What they failed to do (and I'll say thank goodness they never did) was leverage Time-Warner cable and force their customers to migrate to AOL. I know when I had Time-Warner I was scared they do just that. And since I had no alternative I would've just had to swallow it.

FixManTx
Premium
join:2005-02-06
62025-5233

I had TWC/Roadrunner back then and I was afraid of exactly the same thing. At the time I was doing computer work for a friend and had worked on a few client's computers with AOL installed. On a couple of occasions we ended up having to format and re-install Windows to get rid of AOL. I absolutely wanted no part of any ISP that forced me to install software just to get online. At that time I would have had no choice since the phone lines barely supported 28.8 dialup and DSL was not even available where I lived.

Thankfully I now have Verizon FIOS which gives me some of the fastest residential internet available in the country and I don't have to have any cumbersome software installed on my computers.

I always wondered how long AOL could keep up mailing all those "free" CD's in fancy metal boxes and sticking them in just about every magazine I bought. No wonder they had to charge the prices they did for their dial up service.


Saturday, 02-Jun 03:38:04 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics