site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Posting Guidelines ·BELARC Advisor ·BIOS Beep Codes ·Equip. ID FAQ ·Mobo Finder ·Where to Buy Hardware
AuthorAll Replies


TheHarvester
Premium
join:2006-08-25
Dana Point, CA
kudos:3

reply to HarryH3

Re: P4 HT or Core 2?

said by HarryH3:

There's some good stuff in this old thread, where I asked a similar question a while back:
»Fast P4 or slow Core 2 Duo? Which is better for games?
Thanks HarryH3 Good read and info.
said by asdfdfdfdfdf :

If you are sure your motherboard supports core 2 then I would say yes it would be worth doing especially if you are doing batch file manipulation on the images.

What is your main complaint with your system when handling images?
According to Intels site it does support Core2Duo.

Intel D946GZIS Motherboard.
»downloadmirror.intel.com/15108/e···Spec.pdf

The main problem is speed of processing the images. What I need to do is stack multiple images. As stated I can load sometimes over 20 25+Mb images into a program. The program detects the number of stars in the "light" images then creates a "master dark frame" from the loaded "dark images and then does a dark subtract of each image from the "master dark" file to help reduce noise. It then adjusts the field from the "flat field" images loaded to help reduce uneven illumination which causes gradients. Then it will align and stack all the corrected light images to create one final image. Then I need to do some final adjustments in Photoshop of the single stacked image.
All those steps take time and power and I would just like to make the time a bit less by adding some processing power. But only if it may make a noticeable difference.
--
mbsastronomy.com

Saturday, 02-Jun 21:14:28 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics