approval from:
adisor19 
| reply to whiteyonenh
Re: Ummm.... If you want to be limited by a provider then definitely go with verizon, cdma technology has been around so long that their map shouldn't have any white on it. But if you want to keep up with technology and get the full experience then go with At&t. Both companies need to focus on the people that build and maintain the network instead of pissing away money on tit for tat. |
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by JoeShmoe :
If you want to be limited by a provider then definitely go with verizon, cdma technology has been around so long that their map shouldn't have any white on it. But if you want to keep up with technology and get the full experience then go with At&t. Both companies need to focus on the people that build and maintain the network instead of pissing away money on tit for tat.
WOW spoken like a true at&t fanboi/employee/cult member. Just amazing. That at&t kool-aid must be mighty good. |
|
 ropeguruPremium
join:2001-01-25
Mechanicsville, VA | reply to JoeShmoe
said by JoeShmoe :
If you want to be limited by a provider ...
Then go with AT&T for the suckiest 3G coverage... |
|
|
|
| reply to JoeShmoe
said by JoeShmoe :
If you want to be limited by a provider then definitely go with verizon, cdma technology has been around so long that their map shouldn't have any white on it. But if you want to keep up with technology and get the full experience then go with At&t. Both companies need to focus on the people that build and maintain the network instead of pissing away money on tit for tat.
I prefer to have something out where I live. ATT is pretty close to nothing. |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4
 ·VOIPo
| reply to BF69
said by BF69:said by JoeShmoe :
If you want to be limited by a provider then definitely go with verizon, cdma technology has been around so long that their map shouldn't have any white on it. But if you want to keep up with technology and get the full experience then go with At&t. Both companies need to focus on the people that build and maintain the network instead of pissing away money on tit for tat.
WOW spoken like a true at&t fanboi/employee/cult member. Just amazing. That at&t kool-aid must be mighty good. Fanboy posting from a VZ domain?
For me AT&T has been good, depends on the area of the country though. Some providers are better in some geographical areas.
--
"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
 N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" GuanoPremium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1 | He could be posting from a friend's phone, or a company issued phone.
One of my employees was recently issued a Storm 2 and was all pissed off he didn't get an iPhone.
I just about snatched the damn thing back from him, and told him to pay for his own damn calls. The company contract is with Verizon, this is what they give me to give you.
Sorry, but domain name gives an anon post ZERO CRED.
--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power… |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 Reviews:
·VOIPo
| said by N3OGH:He could be posting from a friend's phone, or a company issued phone. One of my employees was recently issued a Storm 2 and was all pissed off he didn't get an iPhone. I just about snatched the damn thing back from him, and told him to pay for his own damn calls. The company contract is with Verizon, this is what they give me to give you. Sorry, but domain name gives an anon post ZERO CRED. I am not saying that it gives him/her credibility, just fairly funny if you ask me. The person stated what they thought and was instantly branded a shill/fanboy etc. Just funny when it is posted from a VZ domain.
--
"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
1 edit | reply to ropeguru
Suckiest? nah! As a T-Mo customer, I would love to have At&T's 3G coverage! |
|
 jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA | reply to ptrowski
Re: Ummm.... Perhaps JoeShmoe had to use a Verizon device because they could not get service with their AT&T phone?  |
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to asdfghjklzx5
Re: Suckiest? nah! I'd think that Nextel would have to be the worst 3G coverage... NONE.
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
| reply to BF69
Re: Ummm.... Nice try BF69, you are so wrong. Im actually using Verizon but as soon as my contract is up I will be switching to at&t. Thats right I'm waiting because Verizons ETF are rediculous. As for the at&t Kool-aid remark...it is played out, be more creative, I've only read it about 1000X's. Oh yeah and I am not and never have worked for either company, nor am I interested to. Just stating the facts as I see them here in Miami. |
|
| said by JoeShmoe :
As for the at&t Kool-aid remark...it is played out, be more creative, I've only read it about 1000X's. Stop explaining. We have all seen the maps. |
|
