republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to Boricua65

Re: Whats next?

What do the minimum wage rates and the new credit card legislation have to do with ETFs for mobile phones? What do you think would happen if companies aren't allowed to charge appropriate ETFs for their products? My guess is that you'll pay more upfront for the devices. BTW, I do believe that the ETFs should be prorated by the number of months on the contract, i.e. prorate a $350 ETF by $14.58 for each month completed of a 24 month contract.

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Because it is the same BS they try to claim to "protect" us consumers. EVERYTHING they don't want to do they claim will cost us more or won't work because "WE" won't except it and yet every single time the industry still strives because us consumers weren't hurt.

If phone prices go up then let them. Then the phone companies will have to find a way to make a good product for less. If they can't innovate in that respect then they don't need to sell phones.


openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

You're missing the point. The phone companies won't be impacted by this type of legislation. The consumers, ironically the ones this legislation is supposed to protect, will end up paying the cost. ETFs affect a relatively small population of mobile device customers. Why potentially impact everyone with higher costs for the "benefit" of a minority that actually wants to terminate their contracts?


Saturday, 02-Jun 21:21:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics