| reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: It really is sad that things of this nature So what good are those "negotiations" when they are made available as you claim and the citizens and/or their representation scream bloody murder?
Why not have it open and tore apart during the negotiations to have it something that would be viable in the end. Instead of trying to be secret then get it tore apart and have to start again.
At least being open would show good faith and allow many people (especially those with the technical knowledge and experience) to give input directly or indirectly. |
|
| said by Skippy25:Why not have it open and tore apart during the negotiations Because many countries wouldn't take part then. |
|
| Does that matter?
If they won't take part if it is open, what are they going to do when it does become open and up for public scrutiny? They going to step aside then? If so, then let them do it now. |
|
 Noah VailSon made my AvatarPremium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:1
 ·Bright House
 ·Sprint Mobile Br..
1 edit | said by Skippy25:Does that matter? If they won't take part if it is open, what are they going to do when it does become open and up for public scrutiny? They going to step aside then? If so, then let them do it now. Worrying about negotiating partners is one worry.
Worrying about the constitutency/proletariat + agenda-ridden-press is another.
One of those worries at a time is difficult enough. Both simultaneously, while being competent in negotiations is likely impossible.
If you support the efforts of the senators, this is what you have to keep in mind.
If you are against the efforts of the senators, then transparency is your friend.
I suppose the right and wrong of the issue, depend on what your desires are.
How's THAT for Moral Equivalency brought to life?
NV
--
In my perfect religion, a giant hole appears and sucks up all the lousy people.
I call it the Crapture. |
|
