republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to karlmarx

Re: Maybe it will die, but..

said by karlmarx:

I for one, will happily share my commercial free versions of TV shows that I legally recorded with EVERYONE who wants it.
But then you are retransmitting without permission which isn't authorized

soothsayer15

join:2002-03-01
Irving, TX

Network broadcasts usually aren't encrypted likecable broadcasts are. I can transfer network shows from my DVR to a hard drive. If I can can do that, others can too, so there will continue to be high quality rips of these shows online for free.

Hulu is great because it's free, but if they change, they'll probably go the way of Napster.


openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

I have no problem with recording OTA broadcasts for personal use, and in fact do so routinely. My point was that as much as karlmarx See Profile believes that content belongs to everyone and that he can do what he wants with it, that's not how the content is currently licensed.

Hulu is only "great" because it's free. The few times that I've used the service, the technology was questionable and the content was definitely lacking. I really don't care if Hulu stays or goes as I don't use the service.



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to openbox9

said by openbox9:

said by karlmarx:

I for one, will happily share my commercial free versions of TV shows that I legally recorded with EVERYONE who wants it.
But then you are retransmitting without permission which isn't authorized
You expect karlmarx to actually read the TOS?

Oh and karl when there is no more new TV you can blame yourself. Do YOU work for free? No. Why do you expect people that provide you with hours upon hours of entertainment to do so? I mean I know that working for Burger King my SEEM like you're working for free, but you are still getting paid.


karlmarx

join:2006-09-18
iraq

TOS? Hmm, nope, never read them, because, oh WAIT, it's FREE! What part of 'free' don't you understand. Here's my logic. #1: It's broadcast for free. #2: The supreme court ruled you have a right to record a show. #3: Downloading a FREE TV show is no different than recording it yourself. You may disagree with that, but please explain how downloading it is ANY different than recording it? BOTH versions are digitally identical in every way manner and form, so there is no difference there. And, being FREE, it means it has a VALUE of, umm, wait for it, umm, FREE!. You can't go from FREE to NOT-FREE. Period.
--
The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity!



BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by karlmarx:

TOS? Hmm, nope, never read them, because, oh WAIT, it's FREE! What part of 'free' don't you understand. Here's my logic. #1: It's broadcast for free. #2: The supreme court ruled you have a right to record a show. #3: Downloading a FREE TV show is no different than recording it yourself. You may disagree with that, but please explain how downloading it is ANY different than recording it? BOTH versions are digitally identical in every way manner and form, so there is no difference there. And, being FREE, it means it has a VALUE of, umm, wait for it, umm, FREE!. You can't go from FREE to NOT-FREE. Period.
Hey Karl ever watch a sporitng event on TV. At the end of the broadcast it CLEARLY says

"Any rebroadcast, reproduction or other use of this game without the express written consent of Major League Baseball( or NFL, NBA , NHL ) is prohibited"

which part of PROHIBITED is too complicated for you to understand?


karlmarx

join:2006-09-18
iraq

Fine, but no-one actually trades sporting events on torrents. Show me a FREE BROADCAST series that has that, and then maybe I'll listen, but I've NEVER seen it on TV, EXCEPT for sports, AND, AND, it's the LEAGUE that prohibits it, NOT the network.
--
The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity!


openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to karlmarx

said by karlmarx:

Here's my logic. #1: It's broadcast for free. #2: The supreme court ruled you have a right to record a show. #3: Downloading a FREE TV show is no different than recording it yourself.
Are you just downloading it, or are you distributing/sharing your umpteen terabytes of recorded content without permission?
said by karlmarx:

You may disagree with that, but please explain how downloading it is ANY different than recording it? BOTH versions are digitally identical in every way manner and form, so there is no difference there.
Actually, that's not correct. When you record the stream OTA, you're recording commercials. I realize that you cut those after recording, but technically, the broadcast is not identical to the torrents that spread around the net.
said by karlmarx:

And, being FREE, it means it has a VALUE of, umm, wait for it, umm, FREE!. You can't go from FREE to NOT-FREE. Period.
The value is what the content owners receive from ad companies, retransmission agreements, etc. Just because you don't value it doesn't mean that it has no value. FREE as in speech, and FREE as in beer are not the same. The content is not copyright free.


fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

reply to karlmarx

said by karlmarx:

TOS? Hmm, nope, never read them, because, oh WAIT, it's FREE! What part of 'free' don't you understand. Here's my logic. #1: It's broadcast for free. #2: The supreme court ruled you have a right to record a show. #3: Downloading a FREE TV show is no different than recording it yourself. You may disagree with that, but please explain how downloading it is ANY different than recording it? BOTH versions are digitally identical in every way manner and form, so there is no difference there. And, being FREE, it means it has a VALUE of, umm, wait for it, umm, FREE!. You can't go from FREE to NOT-FREE. Period.
So by your logic I can just go copy a library book to PDF and put it on the internet because someone can just go to the library and borrow it for free. Right?


karlmarx

join:2006-09-18
iraq

reply to openbox9
No, it IS FREE as in Beer. Well, not totally free, since WE THE TAXPAYERS have GIVEN them the spectrum, which has a value, to the broadcaster for FREE. So, they get FREE spectrum, (well, we gave it to them), and as part of THAT agreement, whatever they broadcast, is, by definition, FREE too. If I have an IDEA, which is all a TV show is really, and I shout it out to the world, then guess what, I can't complain if someone uses my idea. That's EXACTLY what a FREE OTA transmission is, FREE IDEA'S. The 'value' they receive is from advertisers, this is true. And if I don't watch the commercial, then they don't get as much money. Oh, wait, I use adblocker, so websites that give me FREE content ALSO don't get advertising revenue from me. By your definition, if I block AD's, then I guess I am stealing? Adblocked Websites are no different than commercial free torrents. Something is being freely given, and if I use technology to block the ads, then they don't make AS MUCH money. Cry me a river. I pay for bandwidth, what I do with it is MY business. If I choose not to watch ads, be it a web site, or a tv show, then you had better come up with another way to make money, because the TECHNOLOGY has changed the revenue model, and it's not my fault if you can't make money hand over fist like you used to.
--
The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity!


AVonGauss
Premium
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL

Most broadcast stations were not given the spectrum for free, they license it from the FCC on a regular interval for a fee. A fee that in most cases is considered, non-trivial. Misrepresenting the truth or making assumptions that are not true and easily verifiable by doing a quick search does not help your argument, it just makes it look like you are trolling or extremely ignorant.

In the US in most cases it is legal to record a broadcast transmission for your own personal use, however the distribution via any method (CD, torrent) is not allowed due to copyright law. Free has absolutely no bearing on copyright law, if I give you a book for free or even the publisher and/or author gives you a copy, you have absolutely no legal right to distribute copies of the work.



fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

said by AVonGauss:

In the US in most cases it is legal to record a broadcast transmission for your own personal use, however the distribution via any method (CD, torrent) is not allowed due to copyright law. Free has absolutely no bearing on copyright law, if I give you a book for free or even the publisher and/or author gives you a copy, you have absolutely no legal right to distribute copies of the work.
Right. You are allowed to record TV shows to timeshift. That's what the Betamax case was all about. Without timeshifting capability, recording by home users would have been illegal.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to karlmarx

said by karlmarx:

No, it IS FREE as in Beer.
Ok, so we agree on that point.
said by karlmarx:

If I have an IDEA, which is all a TV show is really, and I shout it out to the world, then guess what, I can't complain if someone uses my idea.
But your shouting is copyrighted by you
said by karlmarx:

That's EXACTLY what a FREE OTA transmission is, FREE IDEA'S.
You're confusing free beer and free speech again.
said by karlmarx:

By your definition, if I block AD's, then I guess I am stealing?
By my definition? I have not stated that you are stealing. I don't have issue with recording OTA and cutting commercials for your own personal use. I do so all of the time. As you say, it's FREE (as in beer).
said by karlmarx:

Adblocked Websites are no different than commercial free torrents.
Umm, yes they are. You are consume copyrighted "adblocked" websites for your personal enjoyment. Distributing commercial free contents is no longer for your personal enjoyment and is in violation of the copyright.

Sunday, 03-Jun 08:18:11 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics