 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 4 edits | Secret Service falls down on the job Someone(s) should lose their job over this: »swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/11···-dinner/ And contrary to early reports, they did meet the President: »www.nydailynews.com/news/politic···ama.html
met U.S. President Barack Obama in the receiving line, a White House official said on Friday. »www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxtLJbtC···=related
Scam artists: »askmissa.com/2009/11/26/tareq-an···ehavior/ »www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11···ics%2529 |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| It is amazing. Yet it shows what happens when people act boldly and naturally. Everyone assumes they are supposed to be doing whatever they are doing because they aren't acting suspicious. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
|
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | reply to Romney2012 said by Romney2012:Someone(s) should lose their job over this: I totally agree. This type of thing should NEVER be allowed to happen. God forbid if these had been terrorists in disguise who were intent on causing harm to the President and his staff.
How on earth can anyone screw this up? How hard is it to match someone's ID to a list of invited guests?
The sad part is that this pretty much confirms that social engineering is the best form of hacking. I am just glad these were "harmless" pranksters and not people with malicious intent. -- Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! |
|
 JeffreyWilpon please sell the MetsPremium join:2002-12-24 Long Island kudos:3 Reviews:
·Vonage
·Optimum Online
| reply to KrK said by KrK:It is amazing. Yet it shows what happens when people act boldly and naturally. Everyone assumes they are supposed to be doing whatever they are doing because they aren't acting suspicious. Perception is everything. I say that constantly, and it's true. They were perceived to be invited guests there because they were able to fool quite a few people. Not an easy task.
The SS should figure out what the hell happened, and take immediate action to rectify the situation.
This couple should be thrown in jail. See how they like that reality show. -- "Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin |
|
 Ebolla join:2005-09-28 Dracut, MA | what law did they break that would give them jail time. As far as I can see they drove up to front gate, got turned away, went to another gate, claimed to be on the list but somehow the name was missing. They didn't claim to be someone else, it wasn't like they impersonated someone. Some moron didn't follow protocol and let them in. |
|
 Reviews:
·magicjack.com
| said by Ebolla:what law did they break that would give them jail time. As far as I can see they drove up to front gate, got turned away, went to another gate, claimed to be on the list but somehow the name was missing. They didn't claim to be someone else, it wasn't like they impersonated someone. Some moron didn't follow protocol and let them in. They lied when they said they should be on the list.
This seems like computer hacking. Should an intruder be innocent if the system they hacked was insecure? Or, does the intruder bear the responsibility for knowing that they're trying to hack a system that they were not authorized to access?
Personally, I think we should ban reality shows. I'm getting tired of how our depraved entertainment values have led to this sort of stuff (including the recent "balloon boy" episode.).
Mark |
|
 | reply to pnh102 Now everyone has had a taste of how Homeland Security works! Scarry isn't it. |
|
 Ebolla join:2005-09-28 Dracut, MA | reply to amigo_boy "I am on the list" "no your not" "I should be" "well you are not"
That isn't exactly jail time material. Now if they claimed to be someone they are not that yeah I could see jail time as a possible outcome. Who knows they may of even said "We want to go to the party" and never even claimed to be on the list. |
|
 JeffreyWilpon please sell the MetsPremium join:2002-12-24 Long Island kudos:3 Reviews:
·Vonage
·Optimum Online
| reply to Ebolla said by Ebolla:what law did they break that would give them jail time. For starters, how about Fraud and Conspiracy to Commit Fraud? After that, Tresspassing.
I'm not a lawyer or a judge (thankfully, for both you and me) but you have to set a little bit of a precedent here. People walking into the WH when they feel like can't be tolerated.
Granted, the whole other issue is how the SS allowed this to happen. I don't know what's going on there, but the people that do will figure it out. -- "Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin |
|
 Reviews:
·magicjack.com
| reply to Ebolla said by Ebolla:Now if they claimed to be someone they are not that yeah I could see jail time as a possible outcome. To me, it seems similar to a hacker probing for a way into a system (event) which they know they weren't granted access to.
All your rationalizations about how they didn't misrepresent themselves don't change the above simple fact. When an intruder hacks a system, even using their real name and IP address, they've still hacked a system. Entered something they knew they were not granted access to. It doesn't matter how poor the system's security was.
Mark |
|
 JeffreyWilpon please sell the MetsPremium join:2002-12-24 Long Island kudos:3 | If I rob a bank, and I choose to rob this bank because I know the security sucks and I could probably get away with it, I still robbed a fucking bank. |
|
 jus10 join:2009-08-04 Sterling, VA Reviews:
·Comcast
| Robbing a bank has rather traumatic impacts on the folks working there, and of course, money disappears. That is, someone was harmed.
Now, other than the large amount of egg on the SS's face, I'm not sure what harm occurred. If they got a meal, they should pay for that. But I don't see the need for jailtime. There are real criminals to put in jail.
As to whether they lied to get in, I suppose the first question was if anyone even asked them if they were on the guest list. |
|
 Ebolla join:2005-09-28 Dracut, MA | reply to Jeffrey If someone allowed them in the building is it REALLY trespassing? What fraud was committed, I didn't read they misrepresented themselves. They didn't just walk into the building, they passed a checkpoint. If they jumped a fence and bypassed security i would agree. Not saying that it was RIGHT that they gained access to this. just saying I don't see why jailtime would even be a thought. |
|
 jus10 join:2009-08-04 Sterling, VA Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to Jeffrey It's really crazy that it has gotten to that point. There was a time when you could go into the White House and talk to the president. You know, him being an elected leader and not a king or whatnot.
Rather sad really.
As for the situation, I don't think the administration will press the issue. The couple will get a lambasting by government and the secret service agents who let this happen will be back to hand counting bills in the bottom of the treasury or something but pursuing this is a distraction and there is too much on the administration's plate right now as it is. |
|
 | reply to jus10 said by jus10:That is, someone was harmed. Trust me someone was harmed and he had a badge... Guess what... He will want revenge, and he will have it too. Want to guess why? Because his boss was embarrassed also.
So... These punk assed morons who want to play with the big dogs and do photo ops, they get to go to jail. |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Comcast Digital ..
| reply to amigo_boy I think "reality" shows are making people do whatever it takes, even if it may be detrimental to someone else, to become famous.
I despise reality shows that do not help to better serve mankind. The Biggest Loser is one reality show that I actually like. -- Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil. |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to Jeffrey I don't think they should be punished. Maybe given a stern talking to, but not punished. However clearly security protocol needs to be upgraded.
This is movie type stuff. You see the likes of James Bond, etc swaggering around in formal parties and stuff because they bluffed their way in.
... but it's also possible if a random couple could pull this off, it could have been someone with malicious intent. I doubt they'd of slipped in with guns etc on them, but what if they had some toxic poison or biological agent? It's surprising this breach occurred. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
1 edit | reply to Ebolla Reminds me of this:
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=3B7HG8_xbDw#t=0m45s
:/
Ah darn the time thing didn't work. Forward to 45 seconds in.... |
|
 cline3621Mr. Yuk is MEAN Mr. Yuk is GREENPremium join:2006-06-14 Clarksville, TN Reviews:
·CDE
| reply to Romney2012 Personally, I think the most unfortunate part of this entire episode is the one statement by the secret service that "The President was not in any danger." How the hell would they know? The secret service dropped the ball on security, and let 2 people gain intimate access to the president, who shouldn't have been there. How might have this situation been different had one of these people had some composition 4? Or Pancuronium and an empty syringe? Or perhaps some kind of biological agent? Or some Polonium 210? Think....this was a dinner after all. I know these are rhetorical questions, but its just something to think about.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_···oisoning |
|
 JeffreyWilpon please sell the MetsPremium join:2002-12-24 Long Island kudos:3 Reviews:
·Vonage
·Optimum Online
| reply to KrK said by KrK:... but it's also possible if a random couple could pull this off, it could have been someone with malicious intent. I doubt they'd of slipped in with guns etc on them, but what if they had some toxic poison or biological agent? It's surprising this breach occurred. That's sort of what I'm getting at. What did happen wasn't the end of the world. Nothing "bad" happened, except two nutjobs had the balls to crash the best party. With that said, it could have been much worse.
It's extremely surprising that this breach occurred. If all it takes is a little bit of confidence and swagger, along with a SS mistake to get into a White House function, something needs to be changed.
Who's going to be the next one to try something like this? Someone else who wants 15 mins of fame. -- "Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin |
|