 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | reply to Rob
Re: Ban all Lobbyists.. said by Rob:C'mon Obama, just ban them all. »www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co···=topnews
said by article : Hundreds, if not thousands, of lobbyists are likely to be ejected from federal advisory panels as part of a little-noticed initiative by the Obama administration to curb K Street's influence in Washington, according to White House officials and lobbying experts.
The new policy -- issued with little fanfare this fall by the White House ethics counsel -- may turn out to be the most far-reaching lobbying rule change so far from President Obama, who also has sought to restrict the ability of lobbyists to get jobs in his administration and to negotiate over stimulus contracts.
Well, it's a start. -- trafficcloak.com - pptp/sstp vpn services |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD 1 edit | Don't worry. These lobbyists weren't in any danger of being unemployed for too long.
»news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200901···co/18128
said by the article : So far, though, at least a dozen former lobbyists have found top jobs in his administration, according to an analysis done by Republican sources and corroborated by Politico.
Obama aides did not challenge the the list of lobbyists appointed to administration jobs, but they stressed that former lobbyists comprise a fraction of the more than 8,000 employees who will be hired by the new administration. And they pointed out that before Obama made his campaign-trail promise, he issued a more complete - and more nuanced - policy on former lobbyists.
Formalized in a recent presidential executive order, it forbids executive branch employees from working in an agency, or on a program, for which they have lobbied in the last two years.
Yet in the past few days, a number of exceptions have been granted, with the administration conceding at least two waivers and that a handful of other appointees will recuse themselves from dealing with matters on which they lobbied within the two-year window.
To be fair, this article was originally posted on 01/28/2009, not too long after he was sworn in.
Some more links:
»www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/2···909.html
»www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kel···378.html
»abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=···8&page=1 -- Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | said by pnh102:To be fair, this article was originally posted on 01/28/2009, not too long after he was sworn in. Did you even look at the list of lobbyists from your link? I'm not too concerned about the agenda of people who lobby for the likes of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. -- trafficcloak.com - pptp/sstp vpn services |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | said by Matt:Did you even look at the list of lobbyists from your link? I'm not too concerned about the agenda of people who lobby for the likes of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. And that makes them good? The policy put in place made no distinction in the employment of previous lobbyists.
There was one lobbyist who worked for Goldman Sachs. Is that OK too? -- Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! |
|
 patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | reply to Matt said by Matt:Did you even look at the list of lobbyists from your link? I'm not too concerned about the agenda of people who lobby for the likes of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. What about Obama's administrators enabling surprise tobacco drug testing dragnet at middle schools along with arresting the parents for endangerment of any kid who comes up positive? Second hand smoke kills according to the prosecutor, your now facing attempted manslaughter. |
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | reply to pnh102 said by pnh102:said by Matt:Did you even look at the list of lobbyists from your link? I'm not too concerned about the agenda of people who lobby for the likes of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. And that makes them good? The policy put in place made no distinction in the employment of previous lobbyists. There was one lobbyist who worked for Goldman Sachs. Is that OK too? We're not talking about the same thing. Please read what I quoted from my link below, as I'm not sure you read the link at all.
said by article : The initiative is aimed at a system of advisory committees so vast that federal officials don't have exact numbers for its size; the most recent estimates tally nearly 1,000 panels with total membership exceeding 60,000 people.
Under the policy, which is being phased in over the coming months, none of the more than 13,000 lobbyists in Washington would be able to hold seats on the committees, which advise agencies on trade rules, troop levels, environmental regulations, consumer protections and thousands of other government policies.
-- trafficcloak.com - pptp/sstp vpn services |
|
 | so what i [insert lobbyist] just pay off[bribery amount here] people already there |
|
 GlobalMindDomino Dude, POWER Systems GuyPremium join:2001-10-29 Hollywood, FL | reply to Matt said by Matt:I'm not too concerned about the agenda of people who lobby for the likes of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Yea but be concerned about who is actually behind some of those supposed good will organizations.
 |
|