<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23421909</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:55:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:55:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23426359</link>
<description><![CDATA[RARPSL posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/544328" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=544328');">Turbocpe</a>:</small><br><br>AT&T's latest commercials, which have been in direct response to  Verizon's commercials against AT&T, has been weak. The guy "collecting" postcards from places AT&T provides coverage (many cases, just Edge) is boring and just side skirts the issue that AT&T doesn't have the same 3G coverage that Verizon does. Sure, some people with Edge are satisfied, just as some people with 56K dial-up may have been satisfied.<br> </div>WHAT type of coverage? They do not say in the Ad. They IMPLY that they are talking about 3G coverage but I get the impression they are using VOICE (or as you suggest EDGE) coverage as their measurement tool. At least the Verizon Ads STATE they are talking about 3G coverage (with the mention in the explanation bar on the maps, that EDGE coverage may be available in areas not covered by 3G).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23426359</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:14:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23424986</link>
<description><![CDATA[Madness posted : Luke Wilson tossing the postcards all over the map. I really cracked up on that one. The TRUE AT&T once had a bell on the left!<br><small>--<br>Guy: Sign here please. Me: *signs <b><i>Y</i></b>* Guy: Why sign it as, "Y?" Me: Because "X" is already taken!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23424986</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:24:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23422285</link>
<description><![CDATA[Turbocpe posted : Based on AT&T trying to stop Verizon from airing their commercials on the basis they felt it was misleading as if it was stating AT&T didn't have any coverage in areas, and now AT&T running commercials to indicate their wide (mostly Edge) coverage, it's clear that is what AT&T sees the average consumer as despite that was clearly not the case with Verizon's ads.<br><br>Still, in my opinion, AT&T's commercials completely lack any creativity and are simply boring and lame. I'm no Verizon fanboy, I gave AT&T the chance, and they didn't deliver my world. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23422285</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:09:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23422276</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : Baahh...bahhh.<br>Many consumers are a little sheepish.  Follow the herd into iPhone... complaints R us, and believe what the commercials will tell them.<br><br>I've got some nice post lower ward property / ocean view to sell in NOLA  :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23422276</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:07:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23422130</link>
<description><![CDATA[morbo posted : Agreed--however, Joe Consumer doesn't know the difference between what AT&T is saying and what Verizon is saying. All they remember is whatever the latest commercial told them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Lame-ATT-Commercials-23422130</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:38:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Lame AT&#x26;T Commercials</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Lame-ATT-Commercials-23421909</link>
<description><![CDATA[Turbocpe posted : AT&T's latest commercials, which have been in direct response to  Verizon's commercials against AT&T, has been weak. The guy "collecting" postcards from places AT&T provides coverage (many cases, just Edge) is boring and just side skirts the issue that AT&T doesn't have the same 3G coverage that Verizon does. Sure, some people with Edge are satisfied, just as some people with 56K dial-up may have been satisfied.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Lame-ATT-Commercials-23421909</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:52:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
