how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic
 |
 |
|
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to davoice
Re: 911? said by davoice:said by Matt:What further baffles me, is there is no evidence that any information like this has ever been misused. On the same token, there is no evidence the information was used correctly. That's the rub here. There is no public accountability in the process. As governments worldwide, not just ours, have constantly proven throughout history, government actions are not inherently moral. Thus there should be checks and balances to each granted power. The founding fathers knew this... hence our own 3 branches of government. }Davoice Karl didn't quote this part of the blog post, so it bears including here:
said by Sprint :
Instances where law enforcement agencies seek customer location information include exigent or emergency circumstances such as Amber Alert events, criminal investigations, or cases where a Sprint customer consents to sharing location information.
I'm apt to trust them in this case and when a violation occurs, move forward with appropriate actions. I find it rather ironic that everyone wants to champion the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but then state, rather plainly to the contrary, that law enforcement is guilty until proven innocent.
--
trafficcloak.com - pptp/sstp vpn services | |
| Law enforcement is an agency of the state, so of course it is they that must be held publicly accountable and guilty until proven innocent.
To do otherwise is why our country is so screwed right now; people have way to much trust in the State (slowly waning, however).
And, with all of the instances of police abuse, lying, and criminality amongst their ranks that are covered-up, ignored, and, in some cases, defended it is best to not trust the state and its agents | | |
|
|
