site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
803
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


dcurrey
Premium
join:2004-06-29

1 edit

Ping times

Not sure if it matters I get about 11ms faster when pinging opendns servers.


Phil
Rojo Sol
Premium
join:2001-06-11
Camarillo, CA
kudos:2

1 edit

That's a good point. For me, Google's DNS pings ~73ms versus OpenDNS ~6ms. I wonder which one I'll stick with?



manfmmd
Premium
join:2003-01-14
Earth, TX
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest
·CMA Access

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

P:\>ping 4.2.2.2

Pinging 4.2.2.2 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 4.2.2.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 18ms

P:\>ping 208.67.222.222

Pinging 208.67.222.222 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=55
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 208.67.222.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 19ms

P:\>ping 8.8.8.8

Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=239
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=239
Request timed out.
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 57ms

P:\>

They'll have to work on their response time and dropped packets..

Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 96, Lost = 4 (4% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 57ms

I'm showing OpenDNS to be on par with the 4.2.2.* crowd.
--
"The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan


NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to dcurrey

said by dcurrey:

Not sure if it matters I get about 11ms faster when pinging opendns servers.
Ping is not the best measure of the operation of a DNS server. Some kind of benchmark which actually attempts to resolve host names is a better test.

Nameserver Response Time (ms)
min/avg/max/stdev/retries

68.94.156.1 10.14/10.25/10.40/0.09/0
68.94.157.1 9.90/10.54/11.26/0.44/0
4.2.2.1 20.46/21.09/21.59/0.45/0
4.2.2.3 20.57/22.11/27.43/2.67/0
8.8.8.8 61.54/62.01/62.33/0.27/0
8.8.4.4 61.71/67.78/77.57/6.08/0
208.67.222.222 40.84/44.97/55.68/5.69/0
208.67.220.220 41.23/46.35/60.65/7.27/0

Also ...

Final benchmark results, sorted by nameserver performance:
(average cached name retrieval speed, fastest to slowest)

68. 94.157. 1 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
+ Cached Name | 0.008 | 0.014 | 0.029 | 0.007 | 100.0 |
+ Uncached Name | 0.013 | 0.054 | 0.175 | 0.052 | 100.0 |
+ DotCom Lookup | 0.014 | 0.138 | 0.684 | 0.193 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
dnsr2.sbcglobal.net
DNS Anycast Address Pool2

68. 94.156. 1 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
+ Cached Name | 0.009 | 0.014 | 0.030 | 0.007 | 100.0 |
+ Uncached Name | 0.012 | 0.054 | 0.192 | 0.055 | 100.0 |
+ DotCom Lookup | 0.015 | 0.166 | 0.529 | 0.168 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
dnsr1.sbcglobal.net
DNS Anycast Addressing

4. 2. 2. 6 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.018 | 0.023 | 0.032 | 0.003 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.021 | 0.074 | 0.231 | 0.052 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.021 | 0.066 | 0.182 | 0.053 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
vnsc-lc-dsl.genuity.net
Level 3 Communications

4. 2. 2. 1 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.019 | 0.023 | 0.036 | 0.004 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.022 | 0.088 | 0.229 | 0.068 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.023 | 0.083 | 0.215 | 0.059 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net
Level 3 Communications

204.194.234.200 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.021 | 0.026 | 0.041 | 0.005 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.033 | 0.089 | 0.217 | 0.053 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.025 | 0.126 | 0.211 | 0.065 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
··· no official Internet DNS name ···
··· unknown owner ···

204.194.232.200 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.021 | 0.026 | 0.043 | 0.006 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.033 | 0.101 | 0.244 | 0.063 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.024 | 0.130 | 0.214 | 0.058 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
··· no official Internet DNS name ···
··· unknown owner ···

208. 67.220.220 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.039 | 0.043 | 0.053 | 0.004 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.046 | 0.127 | 0.278 | 0.069 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.048 | 0.163 | 0.237 | 0.066 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
resolver2.opendns.com
OpenDNS, LLC

208. 67.222.222 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.040 | 0.046 | 0.063 | 0.006 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.047 | 0.132 | 0.318 | 0.077 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.041 | 0.158 | 0.232 | 0.064 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
resolver1.opendns.com
OpenDNS, LLC

8. 8. 4. 4 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.060 | 0.067 | 0.087 | 0.007 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.071 | 0.159 | 0.323 | 0.067 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.082 | 0.172 | 0.259 | 0.047 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
··· no official Internet DNS name ···
Level 3 Communications

8. 8. 8. 8 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
- Cached Name | 0.059 | 0.067 | 0.080 | 0.006 | 100.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.067 | 0.159 | 0.324 | 0.074 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.091 | 0.181 | 0.257 | 0.052 | 100.0 |
----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+
any-in-0808.1e100.net
Level 3 Communications

UTC: 2009-12-03, from 20:47:01 to 20:47:47, for 00:46.316

The Google DNS servers are the poorest performers in two different benchmarks.


birdfeedr
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:5

reply to manfmmd
Ping time is not the same as DNS request response time. See this thread. »DNS Service Provider Performance Comparison

While it's info from last May, it may be pertinent. I am not sure the methodology used for data, but it appears the first-time request will not have the same response time as a second or third. For a more comprehensive test, that is.



dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

reply to manfmmd

said by manfmmd:

I'm showing OpenDNS to be on par with the 4.2.2.* crowd.
Only 4.2.2.* servers are CLEAN! with no hoops required.
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee

Sunday, 03-Jun 03:21:25 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics