how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic
 |
 |
|
|
 manfmmdPremium
join:2003-01-14
Earth, TX
 ·AT&T Southwest
 ·CMA Access
| reply to Phil
Re: Ping times Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
P:\>ping 4.2.2.2
Pinging 4.2.2.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 4.2.2.2: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Ping statistics for 4.2.2.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 18ms, Maximum = 19ms, Average = 18ms
P:\>ping 208.67.222.222
Pinging 208.67.222.222 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=55
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Reply from 208.67.222.222: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=55
Ping statistics for 208.67.222.222:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 19ms
P:\>ping 8.8.8.8
Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=239
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=239
Request timed out.
Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=239
Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 58ms, Average = 57ms
P:\>
They'll have to work on their response time and dropped packets..
Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 96, Lost = 4 (4% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 56ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 57ms
I'm showing OpenDNS to be on par with the 4.2.2.* crowd.
--
"The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan | |
 birdfeedrPremium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:5 | Ping time is not the same as DNS request response time. See this thread. »DNS Service Provider Performance Comparison
While it's info from last May, it may be pertinent. I am not sure the methodology used for data, but it appears the first-time request will not have the same response time as a second or third. For a more comprehensive test, that is. | |
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to manfmmd
said by manfmmd:I'm showing OpenDNS to be on par with the 4.2.2.* crowd. Only 4.2.2.* servers are CLEAN! with no hoops required.
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | | |
|
|
