site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Vig
Thread-safe since 1997
Premium
join:2004-03-23
San Diego, CA

reply to amigo_boy

Re: 911?

said by amigo_boy:

So, I think the important question is whether existing federal law treats position data the same as call records. If not, should people start a movement to press for that kind of statutory protection?
This is exactly the question to ask. It's a long-established legal principle that people have an "expectation of privacy" in their phone conversations even though phone service is nothing more than a "consensual consumer relationship" with the phone company. There is not a long-standing precedent for location data because it only recently became commonplace for everyone to carry a potential tracking device.

It would be in keeping with the spirit of the 4th amendment if all these new streams of data were to be considered part of a reasonable expectation of privacy unless otherwise ruled for a compelling reason. Until there's enough body of law to establish precedent, though, there will be great pressure from business interests and law enforcement to maintain a free-for-all use of such data because it makes it easier to achieve their goals.

Saturday, 02-Jun 03:41:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics